Jv
J. van Hoof
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
2 records found
1
Master thesis
(2021)
-
J. van Hoof, F.L. Hooimeijer, M. Parravicini, P.L. Tomesen, J.R.T. van der Velde
An interdisciplinary approach of the building process is needed in order to achieve a more resilient outcome. The aim within this paper will therefore be about the implementation of GreenBlue infrastructure with Open Building to strive for a circular water cycle within the built environment. The following topics have been investigated in order to find out how this can be achieved. Firstly, distinguishing between different levels of decision making in Open Building is brought into connection with the levels that constitute the built environment through which the water cycle circulates. Secondly, the interdependency between the constituents of Open Building and the water cycle is formulated. Thirdly, it is clarified how Open Building can contribute to a high-density neighbourhood and nature inclusive public space. Lastly, the impact of densification on a net positive water cycle is explained and the possibilities of nature inclusive public space to mitigate these effects are given. By structuring the connection of GreenBlue infrastructure with Open Building at different levels of abstraction, a better understanding of the interdependency within planning for urban renewal is put forward. The spatial implications are clarified and substantiated by research through literature study, case study and by design. Eventually, the outcome is analysed/ tested against the thematic research question.
...
An interdisciplinary approach of the building process is needed in order to achieve a more resilient outcome. The aim within this paper will therefore be about the implementation of GreenBlue infrastructure with Open Building to strive for a circular water cycle within the built environment. The following topics have been investigated in order to find out how this can be achieved. Firstly, distinguishing between different levels of decision making in Open Building is brought into connection with the levels that constitute the built environment through which the water cycle circulates. Secondly, the interdependency between the constituents of Open Building and the water cycle is formulated. Thirdly, it is clarified how Open Building can contribute to a high-density neighbourhood and nature inclusive public space. Lastly, the impact of densification on a net positive water cycle is explained and the possibilities of nature inclusive public space to mitigate these effects are given. By structuring the connection of GreenBlue infrastructure with Open Building at different levels of abstraction, a better understanding of the interdependency within planning for urban renewal is put forward. The spatial implications are clarified and substantiated by research through literature study, case study and by design. Eventually, the outcome is analysed/ tested against the thematic research question.
A new hybrid thermal comfort guideline for the Netherlands
Background and development
Journal article
(2015)
-
A. C. Boerstra, J. Van Hoof, A. M. Van Weele
In 2004, the first adaptive thermal comfort guideline was introduced in the Netherlands. Recently, a new, upgraded version of this ISSO 74 (ATG) guideline has been developed. The new requirements are hybrid in nature as the 2014 version of the guideline combines elements of traditional non-adaptive comfort standards with elements of adaptive standards. This paper describes the new guideline and explains the rationale behind it. Also changes in comparison with the original 2004 version and (some) issues related to performance verification are discussed. The information presented in this paper can be used by others (other countries) as inspiration material for new adaptive comfort guidelines and standards.
...
In 2004, the first adaptive thermal comfort guideline was introduced in the Netherlands. Recently, a new, upgraded version of this ISSO 74 (ATG) guideline has been developed. The new requirements are hybrid in nature as the 2014 version of the guideline combines elements of traditional non-adaptive comfort standards with elements of adaptive standards. This paper describes the new guideline and explains the rationale behind it. Also changes in comparison with the original 2004 version and (some) issues related to performance verification are discussed. The information presented in this paper can be used by others (other countries) as inspiration material for new adaptive comfort guidelines and standards.