To limit the need for clinker in cement, CEM III/B is being used more and more in infrastructure. This cement mixture uses significantly less clinker, but instead uses blast furnace slag. Since this is a waste product of the steel industry, CEM III is supposedly much more sustainable than CEM I. However, its mechanical properties are different as well. There has been plenty of research comparing the mechanical properties of CEM I and CEM III concretes, and CEM III concrete seems better in many ways. However, for these experiments only perfect curing conditions had been used. The conditions on the building site are often far from perfect, and affect the integrity of the concrete.

This research has compared the mechanical properties of CEM I 42.5N and CEM III/B 42.5N concrete mixtures in a relative humidity of 55%, which is a realistic value for the building site. This low humidity has a major effect on the hydration, which also affects all mechanical properties. With the help of an experimental campaign, these mechanical properties were tested.

To conclude the findings of this research, it can be stated that sub-optimal curing conditions affect CEM III significantly more than CEM I. Not only are the mechanical
properties lower, but there is a higher uncertainty in the CEM III mechanical properties as well. Applying CEM III in sub-optimal conditions would require extra careful
considerations in the treatment. In the given building site conditions, applying CEM I
would be significantly more durable, cheaper, and especially safer.