Background: Trustworthy AI serves as a foundational pillar for two major AI ethics conferences: AIES and FAccT. Current research often adopts techno-centric approaches, focusing primarily on technical attributes such as accuracy, reliability, robustness, and fairness, while overlooking the sociotechnical dimensions critical to understanding AI trustworthiness in real-world contexts. Objectives: This scoping review aims to examine how the AIES and FAccT communities conceptualize, measure, and validate AI trustworthiness, identifying major gaps and opportunities for advancing a holistic understanding of trustworthy AI systems. Methods: We conduct a scoping review of the AIES and FAccT conference proceedings to date, systematically analyzing how trustworthiness is defined, operationalized, and applied across different research domains. Our analysis focuses on conceptualization approaches, measurement methods, verification and validation techniques, application areas, and underlying values. Results: While significant progress has been made in defining technical attributes such as transparency, accountability, and robustness, our findings reveal critical gaps. Current research often predominantly emphasizes technical precision at the expense of social and ethical considerations. The sociotechnical nature of AI systems remains less explored and trustworthiness emerges as a contested concept shaped by those with the power to define it. Conclusions: An interdisciplinary approach combining technical rigor with social, cultural, and institutional considerations is essential for advancing trustworthy AI. We propose actionable measures for the AI ethics community to adopt holistic frameworks that genuinely address the complex interplay between AI systems and society, ultimately promoting responsible technological development that benefits all stakeholders.

Recommender systems in recruitment platforms involve two active sides, candidates and recruiters, each with distinct goals and preferences. Most recommendation methods address only one side of the problem, leading to potentially ineffective matches. We propose a two-sided fusion framework that jointly models candidate and recruiter preferences to enhance mutual matches between candidates and recruiters. We also propose a personalized two-sided fusion approach to enhance the fairness of job recommendations. Experiments on the XING recruitment dataset show that the proposed approach improves fairness and compatibility, demonstrating the benefits of incorporating two-sided preferences in fairness-aware recommendations.

Large language models (LLMs) have transformed information retrieval through chat interfaces, but their hallucination tendencies pose significant risks. While Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) with citations has emerged as a solution by allowing users to verify responses through source attribution, current evaluation approaches focus primarily on citation correctness - whether cited documents support the corresponding statements. This is insufficient and we introduce citation faithfulness - whether the model's reliance on cited documents is genuine rather than post-rationalized to fit pre-existing knowledge. Our contributions are threefold: (i) we introduce coherent notions of attribution and introduce the concept of citation faithfulness; (ii) we propose desiderata for citations beyond correctness and accuracy needed for trustworthy systems; and (iii) we emphasize evaluating citation faithfulness by studying post-rationalization. Through experimentation, we reveal prevalent post-rationalization issues, finding that up to 57% of citations lack faithfulness. This undermines reliable attribution and may result in misplaced trust, highlighting a critical gap in current LLM-based IR systems. We demonstrate why both citation correctness and faithfulness must be considered when deploying LLMs in IR applications, contributing to a broader discussion of building more reliable and transparent information access systems.

The purpose of the MANILA24 Workshop on information retrieval for climate impact was to bring together researchers from academia, industry, governments, and NGOs to identify and discuss core research problems in information retrieval to assess climate change impacts. The workshop aimed to foster collaboration by bringing communities together that have so far not been very well connected -- information retrieval, natural language processing, systematic reviews, impact assessments, and climate science. The workshop brought together a diverse set of researchers and practitioners interested in contributing to the development of a technical research agenda for information retrieval to assess climate change impacts.

The purpose of the MANILA24 Workshop on information retrieval for climate impact was to bring together researchers from academia, industry, governments, and NGOs to identify and discuss core research problems in information retrieval to assess climate change impacts. The workshop aimed to foster collaboration by bringing communities together that have so far not been very well connected - information retrieval, natural language processing, systematic reviews, impact assessments, and climate science. The workshop brought together a diverse set of researchers and practitioners interested in contributing to the development of a technical research agenda for information retrieval to assess climate change impacts.

Two typical forms of bias in user interaction data with recommender systems (RSs) are popularity bias and positivity bias, which manifest themselves as the over-representation of interactions with popular items or items that users prefer, respectively. Debiasing methods aim to mitigate the effect of selection bias on the evaluation and optimization of RSs. However, existing debiasing methods only consider single-factor forms of bias, e.g., only the item (popularity) or only the rating value (positivity). This is in stark contrast with the real world where user selections are generally affected by multiple factors at once. In this work, we consider multifactorial selection bias in RSs. Our focus is on selection bias affected by both item and rating value factors, which is a generalization and combination of popularity and positivity bias. While the concept of multifactorial bias is intuitive, it brings a severe practical challenge as it requires substantially more data for accurate bias estimation. As a solution, we propose smoothing and alternating gradient descent techniques to reduce variance and improve the robustness of its optimization. Our experimental results reveal that, with our proposed techniques, multifactorial bias corrections are more effective and robust than single-factor counterparts on real-world and synthetic datasets.