Large-scale geological storages of hydrogen (H₂) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) in saline aquifers present feasible options for a sustainable energy future. We compared the plume migration of CO₂ and H₂ in aquifers using the FluidFlower benchmark, incorporating the state-of-the-art thermophysical and petrophysical properties. The H₂ plume, with its higher buoyancy and mobility compared to CO₂, remains predominantly in the gas phase due to its lower solubility, increasing the chances of escaping through fractures or migration to distant regions. This additionally leads to a higher pressurized reservoir, which, along with higher buoyancy, increases the chance of caprock penetration. Dissolution trapping of CO₂ into brine increases over time due to its fingering, while H₂ does not show fingering. Our findings show that while geological carbon storage (GCS) benefits significantly from all structural, dissolution, and residual trapping, underground hydrogen storage (UHS) relies mainly on structural trapping, making the integrity of sealing elements of the system a key factor in its performance.