Egocentric video provides a unique view into human perception and interaction, with growing relevance for augmented reality, robotics, and assistive technologies. However, rapid camera motion and complex scene dynamics pose major challenges for 3D reconstruction from this perspective. While 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has become a state-of-the-art method for efficient, high-quality novel view synthesis, variants, that focus on reconstructing dynamic scenes from monocular video are rarely evaluated on egocentric video. It remains unclear whether existing models generalize to this setting or if egocentric-specific solutions are needed. In this work, we evaluate dynamic monocular 3DGS models on egocentric and exocentric video using paired ego-exo recordings from the EgoExo4D dataset. We find that reconstruction quality is consistently lower in egocentric views. Analysis reveals that the difference in reconstruction quality, measured in peak signal-to-noise ratio, stems from the reconstruction of static, not dynamic, content. Our findings underscore current limitations and motivate the development of egocentric-specific approaches, while also highlighting the value of separately evaluating static and dynamic regions of a video

Egocentric video provides a unique view into human perception and interaction, with growing relevance for augmented reality, robotics, and assistive technologies. However, rapid camera motion and complex scene dynamics pose major challenges for 3D reconstruction from this perspective. While 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has become a state-of-the-art method for efficient, high-quality novel view synthesis, variants, that focus on reconstructing dynamic scenes from monocular video are rarely evaluated on egocentric video. It remains unclear whether existing models generalize to this setting or if egocentric-specific solutions are needed. In this work, we evaluate dynamic monocular 3DGS models on egocentric and exocentric video using paired ego-exo recordings from the EgoExo4D dataset. We find that reconstruction quality is consistently lower in egocentric views. Analysis reveals that the difference in reconstruction quality, measured in peak signal-to-noise ratio, stems from the reconstruction of static, not dynamic, content. Our findings underscore current limitations and motivate the development of egocentric-specific approaches, while also highlighting the value of separately evaluating static and dynamic regions of a video.

In temporal action localization, given an input video, the goal is to predict which actions it contains, where they begin and where they end. Training and testing current state-of-the-art, deep learning models is done assuming access to large amounts of data and computational power. Gathering such data is however a challenging task and access to computational resources might be limited. This work thus explores and measures how well one of such deep learning models, ActionFormer, performs in settings constrained by the amount of data or computational power. Data efficiency was measured by training the model on a subset of the training set and testing on the test set. Although ActionFormer showed promising results on both THUMOS'14 and ActivityNet datasets, TriDet and TemporalMaxer models should likely be chosen in favor of ActionFormer in limited data settings as they exhibit better data efficiency. Similarly, the TriDet model should be chosen in favor of ActionFormer in cases where the training time is limited, as it showed better computational efficiency during training. To test the efficiency of the model during inference, videos of different lengths were passed through the model. Most importantly, we find that both the inference time and the memory usage of the model scale linearly with input video length, as predicted by the authors of the ActionFormer.