O. Strafforello
Please Note
7 records found
1
Object detectors are deployed for object tracking in autonomous vehicles and drones, but also as user assistive tools in medical image analysis and anomaly inspection in industry. Regardless of the end use, object detectors are trained with standard optimization and evaluation strategies. By investigating whether the optimization and evaluation methods of object detectors correlate with human quality judgments, we discover a discrepancy between established metrics and human preferences. To address this, we propose an alternative training loss that better aligns object detectors with human preference.
Subsequently, we ask whether object detections can be used to improve longterm human action recognition in videos. We find that explicitly focusing on the region containing the detected human is beneficial to long-term action recognition models. Unexpectedly, we also find that including a temporal attention module does not help recognizing the videos. Motivated by this result, we investigate how much temporal information is needed to solve long-term action recognition in three popular video datasets. Our results show that most of these videos can be recognized without any long-term temporal information. This suggests that models trained on these videos might exploit short-term shortcuts, instead of learning long-term temporal dependencies. Importantly, these models would not perform successfully on new videos where long-term reasoning is necessary.
As a follow-up, we investigate the impact of the temporal receptive field in longterm action recognition models. The size of the temporal receptive field determines the capability to encode long-term information in videos, like the actions order and duration. We experimentally verify that large temporal receptive fields are sensitive to order and can overfit on the exact action orders seen at training time. Contrarily, short temporal receptive fields are more robust to order permutations and perform better on a current long-term video dataset. This result further demonstrates the irrelevance of long-term information in current long-term action recognition datasets. Our research findings highlight the importance of using training and evaluation metrics that match the intended use of the computer vision systems and choosing training and evaluation datasets that carefully represent the problem at hand. ...
Object detectors are deployed for object tracking in autonomous vehicles and drones, but also as user assistive tools in medical image analysis and anomaly inspection in industry. Regardless of the end use, object detectors are trained with standard optimization and evaluation strategies. By investigating whether the optimization and evaluation methods of object detectors correlate with human quality judgments, we discover a discrepancy between established metrics and human preferences. To address this, we propose an alternative training loss that better aligns object detectors with human preference.
Subsequently, we ask whether object detections can be used to improve longterm human action recognition in videos. We find that explicitly focusing on the region containing the detected human is beneficial to long-term action recognition models. Unexpectedly, we also find that including a temporal attention module does not help recognizing the videos. Motivated by this result, we investigate how much temporal information is needed to solve long-term action recognition in three popular video datasets. Our results show that most of these videos can be recognized without any long-term temporal information. This suggests that models trained on these videos might exploit short-term shortcuts, instead of learning long-term temporal dependencies. Importantly, these models would not perform successfully on new videos where long-term reasoning is necessary.
As a follow-up, we investigate the impact of the temporal receptive field in longterm action recognition models. The size of the temporal receptive field determines the capability to encode long-term information in videos, like the actions order and duration. We experimentally verify that large temporal receptive fields are sensitive to order and can overfit on the exact action orders seen at training time. Contrarily, short temporal receptive fields are more robust to order permutations and perform better on a current long-term video dataset. This result further demonstrates the irrelevance of long-term information in current long-term action recognition datasets. Our research findings highlight the importance of using training and evaluation metrics that match the intended use of the computer vision systems and choosing training and evaluation datasets that carefully represent the problem at hand.
Video BagNet
Short temporal receptive fields increase robustness in long-term action recognition
Long-Term activities involve humans performing complex, minutes-long actions. Differently than in traditional action recognition, complex activities are normally composed of a set of sub-actions, that can appear in different order, duration, and quantity. These aspects introduce a large intra-class variability, that can be hard to model. Our approach aims to adaptively capture and learn the importance of spatial and temporal video regions for minutes-long activity classification. Inspired by previous work on Region Attention, our architecture embeds the spatio-temporal features from multiple video regions into a compact fixed-length representation. These features are extracted with a 3D convolutional backbone specially fine-tuned. Additionally, driven by the prior assumption that the most discriminative locations in the videos are centered around the human that is carrying out the activity, we introduce an Actor Focus mechanism to enhance the feature extraction both in training and inference phase. Our experiments show that the Multi-Regional fine-tuned 3D-CNN, topped with Actor Focus and Region Attention, largely improves the performance of baseline 3D architectures, achieving state-of-the-art results on Breakfast, a well known long-term activity recognition benchmark.