Lora Aroyo
Please Note
9 records found
1
Video summaries or highlights are a compelling alternative for exploring and contextualizing unprecedented amounts of video material. However, the summarization process is commonly automatic, non-transparent and potentially biased towards particular aspects depicted in the original video. Therefore, our aim is to help users like archivists or collection managers to quickly understand which summaries are the most representative for an original video. In this paper, we present empirical results on the utility of different types of visual explanations to achieve transparency for end users on how representative video summaries are, with respect to the original video. We consider four types of video summary explanations, which use in different ways the concepts extracted from the original video subtitles and the video stream, and their prominence. The explanations are generated to meet target user preferences and express different dimensions of transparency: concept prominence, semantic coverage, distance and quantity of coverage. In two user studies we evaluate the utility of the visual explanations for achieving transparency for end users. Our results show that explanations representing all of the dimensions have the highest utility for transparency, and consequently, for understanding the representativeness of video summaries.
Validation methodology for expert-annotated datasets
Event annotation case study
Event detection is still a difficult task due to the complexity and the ambiguity of such entities. On the one hand, we observe a low inter-annotator agreement among experts when annotating events, disregarding the multitude of existing annotation guidelines and their numerous revisions. On the other hand, event extraction systems have a lower measured performance in terms of F1-score compared to other types of entities such as people or locations. In this paper we study the consistency and completeness of expert-annotated datasets for events and time expressions. We propose a data-agnostic validation methodology of such datasets in terms of consistency and completeness. Furthermore, we combine the power of crowds and machines to correct and extend expert-annotated datasets of events. We show the benefit of using crowd-annotated events to train and evaluate a state-of-the-art event extraction system. Our results show that the crowd-annotated events increase the performance of the system by at least 5.3%.
Semantic Web and Human Computation
The status of an emerging field
framing, gender and racial biases) by means of a human-in-the-loop approach
that combines text and image analysis with human computation techniques. ...
framing, gender and racial biases) by means of a human-in-the-loop approach
that combines text and image analysis with human computation techniques.
CaptureBias
Supporting Media Scholars with Ambiguity-Aware Bias Representation for News Videos
capturing bias in news. We study this topic in the context of supporting
media scholars and social scientists in their media analysis. Our focus
lies on racial and gender bias as well as framing and the comparison
of their manifestation across modalities, cultures and languages. In this
paper we lay out a human in the loop approach to investigate the role of
ambiguity in detection and interpretation of bias. ...
capturing bias in news. We study this topic in the context of supporting
media scholars and social scientists in their media analysis. Our focus
lies on racial and gender bias as well as framing and the comparison
of their manifestation across modalities, cultures and languages. In this
paper we lay out a human in the loop approach to investigate the role of
ambiguity in detection and interpretation of bias.
Crowd vs. Experts
Nichesourcing for knowledge intensive tasks in cultural heritage