As wind turbine sizes and their rated power capacities increase, the spatial and temporal load imbalances over the rotor surface increase due to larger wind asymmetries, aerodynamic imbalances, and calibration offsets. The multiblade coordinate (MBC) transform-based individual pitch control (IPC) has garnered significant attention in the literature, and it considers loads in a non-rotating reference frame. This leads to increased pitch actuation for all wind turbine blades when subject to large load imbalances. On the contrary, the single-blade control (SBC) IPC strategy is well suited for handling such load imbalances as it involves equipping each blade with a localized control system, thereby ensuring an independent operation in a rotating reference frame. However, unlike MBC transform-based IPC, the effects of system phase lag on SBC performance have not been investigated. This article investigates the effects of such phase lags and multivariable coupling on SBC performance, and proposes a novel framework for phase compensation in SBC as a convenient method for constructing and calibrating a lead compensator. Using midfidelity OpenFAST simulations, it is demonstrated that phase compensation in SBC improves load mitigation at the targeted frequencies and reduces actuation effort. In contrast, the absence of phase compensation can lead to load amplifications, especially for larger wind turbines.

Individual pitch control (IPC) has been thoroughly researched for its ability to reduce wind turbine blade and tower fatigue loads. Conventional IPC often uses the multiblade coordinate (MBC) transformation and aims for full attenuation of the oscillating loads. However, this also leads to high control effort and increased fatigue damage on the pitch system. Output-constrained IPC uses the minimum actuator effort to drive loads to some reference value instead of fully attenuating them, achieving a trade-off between load reduction and actuator effort. To date, no control method exists that achieves output-constrained IPC using the conventional MBC approach. Furthermore, while multiple constrained IPC approaches have been proposed and analyzed, none of them analyze the full range of operating points between “no IPC” and “full IPC”. This paper presents two output-constrained IPC methods that use the MBC transformation. The first method, ℓ∞ IPC, independently drives the tilt and yaw moment to a tilt and yaw reference, while the second method, ℓ2 IPC, directly targets the magnitude of the combined tilt and yaw load. We furthermore analyze all operating points between no IPC and full IPC. OpenFAST simulations of the IEA 15 MW turbine were run at a wind speed of 15 m s−1. In laminar conditions, ℓ2 IPC is more efficient because it reduces the magnitude of the load directly, while ℓ∞ IPC also uses control effort to change the phase of the blade load in the direction of the load references. To assess the performance in realistic wind conditions, results are averaged over multiple turbulent wind seeds. Both ℓ∞ IPC and ℓ2 IPC have a similar performance, and the operating points between no IPC and full IPC form a nonlinear trade-off. One of the operating points in this trade-off achieves a 50 % load reduction, measured in damage equivalent load, with just 16.4 % of the actuator effort, measured in actuator duty cycle, compared to conventional IPC with the same integrator gain. This shows the potential of output-constrained IPC to facilitate a superior trade-off between load reduction and actuator effort.

Airborne wind energy is an emerging technology that uses tethered flying devices to capture stronger and more steady winds at higher altitudes. Compared to smaller systems, megawatt-scale systems are substantially affected by gravity during flight operation, resulting in power fluctuations. MegAWES, a 3 MW reference model, experiences power fluctuations between -5.8 MW and +20.5 MW every 12.5 seconds during the traction phase when using its baseline controller at a wind speed of 22 m/s. The baseline controller does not have a power limit, leading to high peak power, and aims to keep the tether force constant, causing it to consume power when the kite is flying upwards. In this paper, we implement an optimal torque controller in the MegAWES framework and show that this eliminates the power consumption during the traction phase. Furthermore, we propose a kite tether force controller that allows setting a power limit when combined with the 2-phase reeling strategy, which decreases the peak power. Our new architecture reduces the power output range by 75% to between +3.7 MW and +9.4 MW in strong wind conditions.

MegAWES is a reference design and simulation framework for ground-generation, fixed-wing airborne wind energy systems with a nominal power output of 3 MW. The winch size of MegAWES is based on a smaller system and needs to be scaled up because the current size leads to unrealistically fast dynamics, which require saturation. However, there is no available method to select an appropriate size for the winch. Additionally, while it has been hypothesized that the size of the winch has a significant effect on the dynamics of the overall system for ground-generation concepts, this effect has not been quantified. In this work, we first analyze the effects of the winch size on the system dynamics using a linearized model. Second, we present a method to find the upper bound for the size of the winch based on a selected maximum tether force overshoot during nominal operation. Third, we apply this method to find an upper bound for the winch size for the MegAWES reference design. Using the nonlinear MegAWES simulation framework, we validated this upper bound. At the upper bound, the system accurately tracked the reference tether force without overshoot and when exceeding our upper bound, the tether force response was oscillatory and overshot its ideal value.