I.I. de Pater
Please Note
11 records found
1
Reserve cockpit crew allocation at major airlines is typically determined by scaling historical averages to planned network demand, without uncertainty quantification or systematic incorporation of operational drivers such as crew illness rates, seasonal absence patterns, and calendar effects. Within the broader workforce forecasting literature, uncertainty quantification is largely absent, and moreover, only two prior studies have addressed reserve cockpit crew demand forecasting directly, neither of which covers the European short-haul fleet or produces probabilistic forecasts across multiple planning horizons. This paper presents a probabilistic forecasting framework for cockpit crew reserve demand, evaluated on a cockpit division at KLM Royal Dutch Airlines across forecast horizons of 30, 90, 180, and 360 days. A direct multi-step forecasting strategy is applied, with dedicated models trained per horizon. A diverse set of classical, machine learning (Random Forest, LightGBM), and deep learning models (DeepAR, NHiTS, Temporal Fusion Transformers) is benchmarked on point accuracy and probabilistic calibration, with quantile regression and level-set forecasting (LSF) as uncertainty quantification methods. The experimental results show that the LightGBM model, optimized via quantile regression, achieves the lowest mean pinball loss at every horizon, leading the next-best model by up to 38.0%, but exhibits under-coverage relative to the empirical 90% target at forecasting horizons of 30, 90, and 180 days. Despite its strong probabilistic performance, quantile LightGBM’s point accuracy is modest: its mean absolute error (MAE) is only 4.5% lower than a naive mean baseline at its best horizon, underscoring how little exploitable signal a point forecast alone can extract from this series. The best-performing point model overall, Random Forest, improves on the mean baseline by 9.1% MAE, still a modest margin that highlights the intrinsic difficulty of the forecasting problem and motivates a probabilistic approach. Feature importance and ablation studies show that autoregressive lags and incidental illness rates dominate short-horizon predictions, while planned network demand becomes the primary driver at H = 360; weather alarm indicators are uninformative across all horizons. The framework is extended to planned reserves, voluntary reserves, and incidental illness as separate targets: voluntary reserve usage is up to roughly four times harder to forecast than planned usage on a normalized scale, while incidental illness is the most predictable sub-target. The results establish a proof of concept for data-driven probabilistic reserve planning on the European short-haul fleet and provide a basis for an explainable decision support tool for operational crew planning. The probabilistic forecasting framework reveals that reserve demand predictability differs across forecast horizons, quantile levels, and reserve types, information that a single point-forecast approach cannot provide. ...
Reserve cockpit crew allocation at major airlines is typically determined by scaling historical averages to planned network demand, without uncertainty quantification or systematic incorporation of operational drivers such as crew illness rates, seasonal absence patterns, and calendar effects. Within the broader workforce forecasting literature, uncertainty quantification is largely absent, and moreover, only two prior studies have addressed reserve cockpit crew demand forecasting directly, neither of which covers the European short-haul fleet or produces probabilistic forecasts across multiple planning horizons.
This paper presents a probabilistic forecasting framework for cockpit crew reserve demand, evaluated on a cockpit division at KLM Royal Dutch Airlines across forecast horizons of 30, 90, 180, and 360 days. A direct multi-step forecasting strategy is applied, with dedicated models trained per horizon. A diverse set of classical, machine learning (Random Forest, LightGBM), and deep learning models (DeepAR, NHiTS, Temporal Fusion Transformers) is benchmarked on point accuracy and probabilistic calibration, with quantile regression and level-set forecasting (LSF) as uncertainty quantification methods.
The experimental results show that the LightGBM model, optimized via quantile regression, achieves the lowest mean pinball loss at every horizon, leading the next-best model by up to 38.0%, but exhibits under-coverage relative to the empirical 90% target at forecasting horizons of 30, 90, and 180 days. Despite its strong probabilistic performance, quantile LightGBM’s point accuracy is modest: its mean absolute error (MAE) is only 4.5% lower than a naive mean baseline at its best horizon, underscoring how little exploitable signal a point forecast alone can extract from this series. The best-performing point model overall, Random Forest, improves on the mean baseline by 9.1% MAE, still a modest margin that highlights the intrinsic difficulty of the forecasting problem and motivates a probabilistic approach.
Feature importance and ablation studies show that autoregressive lags and incidental illness rates dominate short-horizon predictions, while planned network demand becomes the primary driver at H = 360; weather alarm indicators are uninformative across all horizons. The framework is extended to planned reserves, voluntary reserves, and incidental illness as separate targets: voluntary reserve usage is up to roughly four times harder to forecast than planned usage on a normalized scale, while incidental illness is the most predictable sub-target.
The results establish a proof of concept for data-driven probabilistic reserve planning on the European short-haul fleet and provide a basis for an explainable decision support tool for operational crew planning. The probabilistic forecasting framework reveals that reserve demand predictability differs across forecast horizons, quantile levels, and reserve types, information that a single point-forecast approach cannot provide.
A two-stage workflow is developed. Stage 1 reconstructs 2024 hourly demand by (i) distributing monthly utility-metered energy with a reference 24 hours load-share pattern, and (ii) adjusting that baseline using flight movements and ambient temperature from 2024; inputs are Open-Meteo re-analysis, Flightradar24 traffic logs, and Aerocivil electricity bills. Stage 2 solves a mixed-integer linear programme that selects optimal capacities and hourly dispatch of photovoltaic (PV), wind, lithium-ion storage batteries (separate PV- and wind-coupled banks), and back-up diesel generation. Six energy systems are explored; four relevant configurations-full hybrid (PV+Wind+Diesel), Renewables-combined (PV+Wind), Renewables-only (PV) & (Wind), and Diesel Renewables (Diesel+PV) and (Diesel+Wind) are analysed in detail.
Results for 2024 show that a full hybrid can satisfy the airports loads at present-worth costs of US$ 458,000 for Gustavo Rojas Pinilla and US$ 11,700 for El Embrujo, reducing diesel use by 82% and 79 %, respectively, relative to current practice. The battery banks operate at moderate time average states of charge (30 - 40 %) with roughly 280-416 equivalent cycles per year. The optimal system build-outs for San Andrés comprise approximately 1 ha of land for 2,461 PV modules (generating 1752 MWh annually), together with four midsize wind turbines requiring about 2 ha (producing 1281 MWh), less than1 MWh of battery storage, and 580 MWh of diesel generation. In contrast, Providencia requires only 228 m2 of land for 57 PV modules (producing 30 MWh), a single wind turbine occupying roughly 0.5 ha (generating around 31 MWh), about
16.5 kWh of battery storage, and 15 MWh of diesel use.
The methodology outlines a framework that utilizes publicly available data for demand analysis and a clear Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) optimization approach. This framework serves as a reproducible and adaptable model for small-island airports aiming to create resilient and low-carbon energy systems. It not only reduces reliance on diesel power but also promotes the development of locally generated energy solutions, thereby enhancing energy autonomy and sustainability in remote and island airport settings.
The islands located in the Caribbean or in the Pacific often benefit from favourable weather conditions, including consistent solar irradiance and adequate wind speeds, which facilitate the effective implementation of renewable energy technologies, particularly solar and wind power systems. ...
A two-stage workflow is developed. Stage 1 reconstructs 2024 hourly demand by (i) distributing monthly utility-metered energy with a reference 24 hours load-share pattern, and (ii) adjusting that baseline using flight movements and ambient temperature from 2024; inputs are Open-Meteo re-analysis, Flightradar24 traffic logs, and Aerocivil electricity bills. Stage 2 solves a mixed-integer linear programme that selects optimal capacities and hourly dispatch of photovoltaic (PV), wind, lithium-ion storage batteries (separate PV- and wind-coupled banks), and back-up diesel generation. Six energy systems are explored; four relevant configurations-full hybrid (PV+Wind+Diesel), Renewables-combined (PV+Wind), Renewables-only (PV) & (Wind), and Diesel Renewables (Diesel+PV) and (Diesel+Wind) are analysed in detail.
Results for 2024 show that a full hybrid can satisfy the airports loads at present-worth costs of US$ 458,000 for Gustavo Rojas Pinilla and US$ 11,700 for El Embrujo, reducing diesel use by 82% and 79 %, respectively, relative to current practice. The battery banks operate at moderate time average states of charge (30 - 40 %) with roughly 280-416 equivalent cycles per year. The optimal system build-outs for San Andrés comprise approximately 1 ha of land for 2,461 PV modules (generating 1752 MWh annually), together with four midsize wind turbines requiring about 2 ha (producing 1281 MWh), less than1 MWh of battery storage, and 580 MWh of diesel generation. In contrast, Providencia requires only 228 m2 of land for 57 PV modules (producing 30 MWh), a single wind turbine occupying roughly 0.5 ha (generating around 31 MWh), about
16.5 kWh of battery storage, and 15 MWh of diesel use.
The methodology outlines a framework that utilizes publicly available data for demand analysis and a clear Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) optimization approach. This framework serves as a reproducible and adaptable model for small-island airports aiming to create resilient and low-carbon energy systems. It not only reduces reliance on diesel power but also promotes the development of locally generated energy solutions, thereby enhancing energy autonomy and sustainability in remote and island airport settings.
The islands located in the Caribbean or in the Pacific often benefit from favourable weather conditions, including consistent solar irradiance and adequate wind speeds, which facilitate the effective implementation of renewable energy technologies, particularly solar and wind power systems.
Aircraft Maintenance, Repair & Overhaul Spare Parts Management
Demand & Procurement Optimization
Engine Shop Visit Optimization
A Case Study At A Major European Airline
Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Complex Components in an Operational Environment
A Deep Learning Approach