JG
J.L. Gonzalez Acosta
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
2 records found
1
The material point method (MPM) is gaining increasing amounts of attention due to its capacity to solve geotechnical problems involving large-deformations. While some problems require dynamic analysis, simulating the (infinite) continuous domain using typical Dirichlet (fixed) boundary conditions induce spurious reflections causing (1) unrealistic stress increments at the domain oundary and (2) the appearance of multiple unnatural stress waves in the domain. Aiming to eliminate this numerical artifact in MPM, two solutions for absorbing boundary conditions found in FEM are implemented and investigated; these are (1) a viscous boundary condition and (2) a viscoelastic boundary condition. The use of such dynamic boundary conditions in MPM is scarce and no validation of them has yet been presented in the literature. In this work, these absorbing conditions are implemented alongside other recent developments, which improves the numerical stability (Double-Mapping, Generalized Material Point Method, Composite Material Point Method), using two approaches: (1) directly imposing at the external active boundary nodes and (2) imposing via shape function interpolation. The proposed solutions are then validated with a one-dimensional benchmark: a soil column under dynamic load in small-deformation and large-deformation, and a 2D symmetric plane strain model under one loading pulse. The benchmark results demonstrate that the numerical reflections that lead to inaccuracies of stress and velocity can be removed using GIMP interpolation and, together with the other numerical technics, render high-quality and realistic results. A study of shallow foundation failure under repeated loading is also presented, showing the potential of applications of the proposed solution for modelling extreme geotechnical events.
...
The material point method (MPM) is gaining increasing amounts of attention due to its capacity to solve geotechnical problems involving large-deformations. While some problems require dynamic analysis, simulating the (infinite) continuous domain using typical Dirichlet (fixed) boundary conditions induce spurious reflections causing (1) unrealistic stress increments at the domain oundary and (2) the appearance of multiple unnatural stress waves in the domain. Aiming to eliminate this numerical artifact in MPM, two solutions for absorbing boundary conditions found in FEM are implemented and investigated; these are (1) a viscous boundary condition and (2) a viscoelastic boundary condition. The use of such dynamic boundary conditions in MPM is scarce and no validation of them has yet been presented in the literature. In this work, these absorbing conditions are implemented alongside other recent developments, which improves the numerical stability (Double-Mapping, Generalized Material Point Method, Composite Material Point Method), using two approaches: (1) directly imposing at the external active boundary nodes and (2) imposing via shape function interpolation. The proposed solutions are then validated with a one-dimensional benchmark: a soil column under dynamic load in small-deformation and large-deformation, and a 2D symmetric plane strain model under one loading pulse. The benchmark results demonstrate that the numerical reflections that lead to inaccuracies of stress and velocity can be removed using GIMP interpolation and, together with the other numerical technics, render high-quality and realistic results. A study of shallow foundation failure under repeated loading is also presented, showing the potential of applications of the proposed solution for modelling extreme geotechnical events.
Master thesis
(2017)
-
Guido Remmerswaal, Phil Vardon, Michael Hicks, Robert Jan Labeur, Leon Gonzalez Acosta
A new technique is developed in this thesis, which applies boundary conditions to moving boundaries in the Material Point Method (MPM). While MPM has been proven to be useful in slope stability, foundation and seabed ploughing modelling, the application of boundary conditions is still a challenge,
because the location of the boundary is unknown in MPM.
Boundary conditions have currently been applied to fixed boundaries with a known location. These conditions can be applied directly onto the background grid. In this thesis the concept of applying boundary conditions to the background grid has been expanded to boundaries, which do not coincide with the background grid. This technique can thus also be used for moving boundary conditions. Therefore, the research question of this thesis is: Can boundary conditions on moving boundaries be appropriately applied to the background mesh of an MPM in slope stability problems?
The location of the boundary is not defined by current versions of MPM. Thus an edge detection method was constructed to locate the boundary based on the information provided by MPM. The Volume of Fluid method (VOF) and the Surface Marker Method (SMM), two edge detection methods used in fluid dynamics, have been tested. Moreover, a new implementation of the Level Set Method has been developed in this thesis, which uses a composite Bézier curve to define the boundary. The method has been called the Proximity Field Method (PFM). PFM locates the boundary based on the distance towards a material point, VOF uses the volume of material at a location to determine the location of boundaries and SMM places fake material points at the initial boundary to track it.
The accuracy of VOF proved to be too small for the application of boundary conditions. SMM gave a better representation of the boundary at small strains in comparison to PFM. However, the main advantage of MPM is the possibility of large strain modelling, which SMM could not handle. PFM was able to handle these larger strains and was therefore chosen as the basis for the application of boundary conditions.
PFM’s representation of the boundary was improved to be useful in the application of boundary conditions. Smoothing of the surface together with an equal spacing of the material points in the initial condition have improved the representation of the boundary. Moreover, the computation cost had to be reduced, because it was too high after the initial implementation.
Finally, PFM has been used to apply a surface traction to MPM. The surface traction must be distributed from the boundary to the nodes of the background grid. This technique has been tested by applying a load to the top of a soil slope. As intended, the load is transferred to the background grid and changes according to the location of the boundary. As expected, the deformation of the slope is increased due to the application of the load. So, the concept of applying boundary conditions on moving boundaries to the background grid has been proven to work.
...
because the location of the boundary is unknown in MPM.
Boundary conditions have currently been applied to fixed boundaries with a known location. These conditions can be applied directly onto the background grid. In this thesis the concept of applying boundary conditions to the background grid has been expanded to boundaries, which do not coincide with the background grid. This technique can thus also be used for moving boundary conditions. Therefore, the research question of this thesis is: Can boundary conditions on moving boundaries be appropriately applied to the background mesh of an MPM in slope stability problems?
The location of the boundary is not defined by current versions of MPM. Thus an edge detection method was constructed to locate the boundary based on the information provided by MPM. The Volume of Fluid method (VOF) and the Surface Marker Method (SMM), two edge detection methods used in fluid dynamics, have been tested. Moreover, a new implementation of the Level Set Method has been developed in this thesis, which uses a composite Bézier curve to define the boundary. The method has been called the Proximity Field Method (PFM). PFM locates the boundary based on the distance towards a material point, VOF uses the volume of material at a location to determine the location of boundaries and SMM places fake material points at the initial boundary to track it.
The accuracy of VOF proved to be too small for the application of boundary conditions. SMM gave a better representation of the boundary at small strains in comparison to PFM. However, the main advantage of MPM is the possibility of large strain modelling, which SMM could not handle. PFM was able to handle these larger strains and was therefore chosen as the basis for the application of boundary conditions.
PFM’s representation of the boundary was improved to be useful in the application of boundary conditions. Smoothing of the surface together with an equal spacing of the material points in the initial condition have improved the representation of the boundary. Moreover, the computation cost had to be reduced, because it was too high after the initial implementation.
Finally, PFM has been used to apply a surface traction to MPM. The surface traction must be distributed from the boundary to the nodes of the background grid. This technique has been tested by applying a load to the top of a soil slope. As intended, the load is transferred to the background grid and changes according to the location of the boundary. As expected, the deformation of the slope is increased due to the application of the load. So, the concept of applying boundary conditions on moving boundaries to the background grid has been proven to work.
...
A new technique is developed in this thesis, which applies boundary conditions to moving boundaries in the Material Point Method (MPM). While MPM has been proven to be useful in slope stability, foundation and seabed ploughing modelling, the application of boundary conditions is still a challenge,
because the location of the boundary is unknown in MPM.
Boundary conditions have currently been applied to fixed boundaries with a known location. These conditions can be applied directly onto the background grid. In this thesis the concept of applying boundary conditions to the background grid has been expanded to boundaries, which do not coincide with the background grid. This technique can thus also be used for moving boundary conditions. Therefore, the research question of this thesis is: Can boundary conditions on moving boundaries be appropriately applied to the background mesh of an MPM in slope stability problems?
The location of the boundary is not defined by current versions of MPM. Thus an edge detection method was constructed to locate the boundary based on the information provided by MPM. The Volume of Fluid method (VOF) and the Surface Marker Method (SMM), two edge detection methods used in fluid dynamics, have been tested. Moreover, a new implementation of the Level Set Method has been developed in this thesis, which uses a composite Bézier curve to define the boundary. The method has been called the Proximity Field Method (PFM). PFM locates the boundary based on the distance towards a material point, VOF uses the volume of material at a location to determine the location of boundaries and SMM places fake material points at the initial boundary to track it.
The accuracy of VOF proved to be too small for the application of boundary conditions. SMM gave a better representation of the boundary at small strains in comparison to PFM. However, the main advantage of MPM is the possibility of large strain modelling, which SMM could not handle. PFM was able to handle these larger strains and was therefore chosen as the basis for the application of boundary conditions.
PFM’s representation of the boundary was improved to be useful in the application of boundary conditions. Smoothing of the surface together with an equal spacing of the material points in the initial condition have improved the representation of the boundary. Moreover, the computation cost had to be reduced, because it was too high after the initial implementation.
Finally, PFM has been used to apply a surface traction to MPM. The surface traction must be distributed from the boundary to the nodes of the background grid. This technique has been tested by applying a load to the top of a soil slope. As intended, the load is transferred to the background grid and changes according to the location of the boundary. As expected, the deformation of the slope is increased due to the application of the load. So, the concept of applying boundary conditions on moving boundaries to the background grid has been proven to work.
because the location of the boundary is unknown in MPM.
Boundary conditions have currently been applied to fixed boundaries with a known location. These conditions can be applied directly onto the background grid. In this thesis the concept of applying boundary conditions to the background grid has been expanded to boundaries, which do not coincide with the background grid. This technique can thus also be used for moving boundary conditions. Therefore, the research question of this thesis is: Can boundary conditions on moving boundaries be appropriately applied to the background mesh of an MPM in slope stability problems?
The location of the boundary is not defined by current versions of MPM. Thus an edge detection method was constructed to locate the boundary based on the information provided by MPM. The Volume of Fluid method (VOF) and the Surface Marker Method (SMM), two edge detection methods used in fluid dynamics, have been tested. Moreover, a new implementation of the Level Set Method has been developed in this thesis, which uses a composite Bézier curve to define the boundary. The method has been called the Proximity Field Method (PFM). PFM locates the boundary based on the distance towards a material point, VOF uses the volume of material at a location to determine the location of boundaries and SMM places fake material points at the initial boundary to track it.
The accuracy of VOF proved to be too small for the application of boundary conditions. SMM gave a better representation of the boundary at small strains in comparison to PFM. However, the main advantage of MPM is the possibility of large strain modelling, which SMM could not handle. PFM was able to handle these larger strains and was therefore chosen as the basis for the application of boundary conditions.
PFM’s representation of the boundary was improved to be useful in the application of boundary conditions. Smoothing of the surface together with an equal spacing of the material points in the initial condition have improved the representation of the boundary. Moreover, the computation cost had to be reduced, because it was too high after the initial implementation.
Finally, PFM has been used to apply a surface traction to MPM. The surface traction must be distributed from the boundary to the nodes of the background grid. This technique has been tested by applying a load to the top of a soil slope. As intended, the load is transferred to the background grid and changes according to the location of the boundary. As expected, the deformation of the slope is increased due to the application of the load. So, the concept of applying boundary conditions on moving boundaries to the background grid has been proven to work.