Towards Personalization of Robot-Assisted Motor Learning Based on User Characteristics
Haptic Guidance seems better suited for individuals with a more Internal rather than External Locus of Control
C.H.W. Boersma (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)
L Marchal – Mentor (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)
A. Zgonnikov – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)
S. Dalla Gasperina – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)
D. Adrichem – Graduation committee member
J. C.F. Winter – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Robots can aid in post-stroke motor function recovery and motor learning through the use of haptic feedback during collaborative training. A clear objective in robotic-assisted motor learning is to adapt the haptic feedback to individual users, but personal characteristics are not yet considered in this adaptation.
We investigated the suitability of a haptic guidance feedback strategy, based on participants’ locus of control character trait, compared to training without haptic guidance. For this purpose, a motor learning experiment was conducted on 42 healthy participants, where the internal dynamics of a pendulum had to be learned in order to hit upcoming targets. For two groups, training either with or without haptic guidance, we assessed motor learning and its generalization to similar tasks through target hitting performance, as well as behavior during training and perceived user experience.
Evidence was found of a relatively better performance improvement in both training and long-term (generalization of) motor learning for participants with a more internal compared to external locus of control. Lower observed interaction force during training and increasingly better performance throughout training
in these participants may have caused these motor learning differences. More positive user experience in these individuals through a higher perceived control over the pendulum and lower perceived frustration with haptic guidance may have also contributed.
Combined, this suggests an intrinsically better compatibility
with haptic guidance for people with a more internal rather than
external locus of control, for motor learning, during training and
in user experience