Modelling and Topology Optimisation of Medium Voltage CPES - Synthetic Dutch Case Study
Marcel Brouwers (Student TU Delft)
Pedro V. Vergara Barrios (TU Delft - Intelligent Electrical Power Grids)
Peter Palensky (TU Delft - Electrical Sustainable Energy)
José Luis Rueda Torres (TU Delft - Intelligent Electrical Power Grids)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
This work seeks to reduce the severity of congestion in the medium voltage (MV) cyber-physical systems (CPES) by optimising the network topology in line with seasonal variations in the supply and demand of electricity. To this aim a two-stage reconfiguration algorithm is proposed. In the first stage, the positions of the normally open switches within the network are optimised in to adjust the power flow therein. These optimised positions are subsequently used in the second stage to calculate the network variables. The first stage is implemented as a mixed-integer linear program (MILP) optimisation in Python, whereas the second stage consists of a Newton-Raphson calculation in DIgSILENT PowerFactory software package. The benefit of network reconfiguration is that it is a short-term and low-cost solution which can be implemented by a distribution system operator (DSO) without relying on other external parties. The presented case study addresses the need of seasonal reconfigurations to accommodate for the manual operation of the switches present within a synthetic model of MV CPES, which is implemented inspired from CPES in the Netherlands. The application of the algorithm significantly reduces the frequency by which reconfiguration actions can be performed. Furthermore, the algorithm is able to consistently reduce congestion within the analysed synthetic CPES, completely removing it or reducing its severity. It also outperforms two alternative optimisation options implemented in PowerFactory with regard to the objective function value. Those being an iterative exploration of meshes and a genetic algorithm.