Training Pilots for Unexpected Events

A Simulator Study on the Advantage of Unpredictable and Variable Scenarios

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

H.M. Landman (TNO, TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Peter van Oorschot (Student TU Delft)

MM van Paassen (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Eric Groen

Adelbert W. Bronkhorst (TNO)

M Mulder (TU Delft - Control & Operations, TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Research Group
Control & Simulation
Copyright
© 2018 H.M. Landman, P. van Oorschot, M.M. van Paassen, Eric L. Groen, Adelbert W. Bronkhorst, Max Mulder
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818779928
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 H.M. Landman, P. van Oorschot, M.M. van Paassen, Eric L. Groen, Adelbert W. Bronkhorst, Max Mulder
Research Group
Control & Simulation
Issue number
6
Volume number
60
Pages (from-to)
793-805
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Objective: This study tested whether simulator-based training of pilot responses to unexpected or novel events can be improved by including unpredictability and variability in training scenarios. Background: Current regulations allow for highly predictable and invariable training, which may not be sufficient to prepare pilots for unexpected or novel situations in-flight. Training for surprise will become mandatory in the near future. Method: Using an aircraft model largely unfamiliar to the participants, one group of 10 pilots (the unpredictable and variable [U/V] group) practiced responses to controllability issues in a relatively U/V manner. A control group of another 10 pilots practiced the same failures in a highly predictable and invariable manner. After the practice, performance of all pilots was tested in a surprise scenario, in which the pilots had to apply the learned knowledge. To control for surprise habituation and familiarization with the controls, two control tests were included. Results: Whereas the U/V group required more time than the control group to identify failures during the practice, the results indicated superior understanding and performance in the U/V group as compared to the control group in the surprise test. There were no significant differences between the groups in surprise or performance in the control tests. Conclusion: Given the results, we conclude that organizing pilot training in a more U/V way improves transfer of training to unexpected situations in-flight. Application: The outcomes suggest that the inclusion of U/V simulator training scenarios is important when training pilots for unexpected situations.