Modified Semi-Analytical Method for 3D Slope Reliability

Conference Paper (2019)
Author(s)

Divya Varkey (Geo-engineering)

Michael Hicks (Geo-engineering)

Phil Vardon (Geo-engineering)

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-11-2725-0 IS1-8-cd Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Article number
IS1-8
Pages (from-to)
411-416
ISBN (electronic)
978-981-11-2725-0
Event
ISGSR 2019: 7th International Symposium on Geotechnical Safety and Risk (2019-12-11 - 2019-12-13), National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
Downloads counter
299
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

An improved method for the reliability analysis of 3D slopes has been proposed based on the semi-analytical method of Vanmarcke (1977). Comparing the predicted responses of an idealised 3D slope obtained by the more general, albeit computationally intensive, random finite element method (RFEM), and the original semi-analytical method showed that the latter gives unconservative estimates of the probability of failure. Three significant areas were identified as requiring improvement in the simpler method. These were corrected by: (i) a correction factor to reduce the overestimation of endresistance in 3D failures, i.e. reducing the impact of conservative geometric assumptions; (ii) a correction factor to correct for overestimating the average shear strength on the failure plane, which is found to be lower than the average shear strength for the entire slope; and (iii) an alternative relationship for the expected failure length for intermediate values of the spatial correlation length of the shear strength. The proposed modified semi-analytical method gives substantially improved results that are comparable to RFEM, while retaining the simplicity of the original method.

Files

IS1_8.pdf
(pdf | 0.899 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 13-06-2020
License info not available