The Role of Apartment Typology- and Public Space Configurations in Neighbourhood Liveability

From acces to interaction: a healthy living environment | A Study of Perceived Safety, Social Interaction and Informal Social Control in Historicibuurt, The Hague

Master Thesis (2026)
Author(s)

J. Hoogland (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Contributor(s)

B.M. Jurgenhake – Mentor (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

J.H.A. Macco – Mentor (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Coordinates
52.054452, 4.254525
Graduation Date
23-06-2026
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Downloads counter
8
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Urban residential areas characterised by low perceived safety, weak social cohesion, and fragmented public space often experience reduced neighbourhood liveability. This research focuses on the northern part of the Historicibuurt in Houtwijk, The Hague, where the existing apartment typologies and their adjacent public spaces contribute to limited visibility, ambiguous spatial boundaries, and insufficient opportunities for everyday social interaction. The central research question is: How could a redesign of the apartment typologies and their direct adjacent public space in Historicibuurt, The Hague, improve perceived safety and social cohesion, thereby enhancing neighbourhood liveability? The study adopts a research-by-design methodology. It combines literature reviews, spatial analysis, fieldwork, interviews, case study research, and design evaluation. The findings show that perceived safety, social interaction, and informal social control are strongly interrelated. In the current situation, blind façades, hidden corners, storage areas, unclear thresholds, and poorly overlooked routes weaken the residents’ sense of safety and reduce collective responsibility for shared spaces. Social cohesion is present in this area, but it remains fragmented and mainly limited to direct neighbours. The research concludes that (re)designs could enhance liveability by designing the relationship between housing and public space into an active, visible, and socially meaningful spatial structure. Key solutions include active ground floors, improved sightlines, collective entrances, communal gardens, soft transitions between public and private space, and shared amenities along daily routes. These strategies can strengthen natural surveillance, support informal encounters, and encourage residents to recognise, use, and care for shared spaces. In this way, the project demonstrates how architectural and urban design can contribute to a safer, more cohesive, and more liveable neighbourhood.