Towards constructive design feedback dialogues

guiding peer and client feedback to stimulate children’s creative thinking

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Alice Schut (TU Delft - Science Education and Communication)

M.P.P. van Mechelen (TU Delft - Codesigning Social Change, Aarhus University, TU Delft - Industrial Design)

R.M. Klapwijk (TU Delft - Science Education and Communication)

Mathieu Gielen (TU Delft - Industrial Design, TU Delft - Codesigning Social Change)

MJ de Vries (TU Delft - Science Education and Communication, TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

Research Group
Science Education and Communication
Copyright
© 2020 A. Schut, M.P.P. van Mechelen, R.M. Klapwijk, M.A. Gielen, M.J. de Vries
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09612-y
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 A. Schut, M.P.P. van Mechelen, R.M. Klapwijk, M.A. Gielen, M.J. de Vries
Research Group
Science Education and Communication
Issue number
1
Volume number
32
Pages (from-to)
99-127
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Design feedback is an essential pedagogical tool that can help young novice designers navigate divergent and convergent paths while designing. However, design feedback is often met with resistance, which counteracts its potential to help novice designers evaluate their design and generate new solution directions. In this paper, we report on the construction and utilization of a design feedback intervention during a real-life design project with a group of primary school children (aged 8–12). The goal of the intervention was to stimulate young novice designers’ creative thinking by guiding the design feedback dialogues with their peers and clients. The intervention was designed according to the following key principles: (1) guide towards a shared understanding of the design through low-level convergent feedback, (2) stimulate critical reflection and evaluation of the design to help identify and internalize possible shortcomings through high-level convergent feedback, and (3) provide a way to move forward by guiding new generative thoughts through high-level divergent feedback. Overall, the results show that the intervention can support young novice designers, their peers, and clients in engaging in constructive feedback dialogues, thereby stimulating their creative thinking. Our main contribution entails a detailed understanding of the successes and obstacles within the feedback dialogues, as guided by the intervention. Based on these results, we propose a set of refined design principles to inform feedback interventions. With this research we hope to give insight in the complexity of design feedback dialogues, while also inspiring design educators to actively try out these key principles.