Identifying the Importance of Performance Attributes for Innovations in Port Call Management

A BWM approach in multiple port cases

Master Thesis (2022)
Author(s)

M. Schoneveld (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Contributor(s)

Lóránt A. Tavasszy – Mentor (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Wouter W A van Blokland – Mentor (TU Delft - Transport Engineering and Logistics)

Rob Stikkelman – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)

Edwin van Hassel – Coach (Universiteit Antwerpen)

P.C.N. Everts – Coach (KOTUG International)

Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Copyright
© 2022 Martijn Schoneveld
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Martijn Schoneveld
Graduation Date
04-11-2022
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Transport, Infrastructure and Logistics']
Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Port performance is under pressure due to high congestion levels and a need to reduce GHG emissions. The industry is looking for ways to increase efficiency in ports. A promising concept is known as port call optimization where waiting times and turn-around times can be reduced. This research contributes to the body of port call optimization literature by identifying the importance of performance attributes for innovations. Identifying the performance attributes and how stakeholders weight these has never been explored before in literature. The relative importance has been derived using the Bayesian Best-Worst Method. The performance attributes: incidents, near misses, robustness and added value, are most important for evaluating an innovation for port call management. Results on micro level show heterogeneity and homogeneity in preferences for port attributes. Both ports with complex nautical restrictions prefer performance attributes related to safety. The port with centralised management is more commercially driven and there is homogeneity within a port. Furthermore, heterogeneity is seen between stakeholder groups and between port authority (PA). PAs from centralised port value attributes relatively different than a PA with decentralised and licensing activities. Some differences and similarities can be explained by the port contexts. The findings can be used for the design of innovations in port call management. Research could be repeated in other port cases to validate the significance of these results.

Files

TIL_Thesis_Report_Martijn_Scho... (pdf)
(pdf | 10.8 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-04-2023
License info not available