Supporting organizational decision-making in building adaptation

a scenario-based multi-criteria analysis framework

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Brian van Laar (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Angela Greco (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Hilde Remøy (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Vincent Hendrikus Gruis (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Research Group
Real Estate Management
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-10-2025-0645 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Real Estate Management
Journal title
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Pages (from-to)
1-28
Downloads counter
22
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Purpose
This study introduces an integrated decision-support framework to aid early-stage planning for building adaptation. It aims to support structured decision-making and priority-setting within organizations by combining scenario development, stakeholder evaluation and AI-enhanced communication.

Design/methodology/approach
The framework integrates cross-impact balance (CIB) analysis, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Fuzzy-TOPSIS and generative AI techniques for scenario communication and visualization. It was applied within a Paris-based social housing association through participatory workshops with internal stakeholders, including architects, sustainability officers and project managers.

Findings
The integrated framework produced 21 internally consistent scenarios, prioritized them through stakeholder-weighted objectives and identified high-performing adaptation pathways. Results revealed that strong CIB-based scenario filtering substantially conditioned downstream MCDA behaviour, producing relatively robust but convergent ranking outcomes across structurally distinct scenarios. AI-generated narratives and visuals further supported communication of complex trade-offs and exploratory planning within the organizational context.

Research limitations/implications
Application was limited to a single case and stakeholder group. Future research should test the method in broader multi-actor settings, incorporate participant validation and explore automation of CIB construction and weighting to improve scalability and reduce resource demands.

Practical implications
The approach helps decision-makers co-develop and compare building adaptation pathways aligned with organizational goals. Its modular design supports integration into asset management and planning systems.

Originality/value
This is the first study to combine CIB-based scenario planning with MCDA for building adaptation, enhanced with AI-supported scenario communication. Beyond methodological integration, the study contributes new insights into how upstream scenario-space conditioning influences downstream ranking behaviour, evaluative convergence and discriminatory capacity within exploratory decision-support systems.