Virtual Coaching for Smoking Cessation: What are Users Preference in Ethical Principles for Human Feedback Allocation

Bachelor thesis (2024)

Authors

G. Labunskis Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science

Contributors

N. Albers Interactive Intelligence - EEMCS (mentor)
W.P. Brinkman Interactive Intelligence - EEMCS (mentor)
Z. Yue (graduation committee member)
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

25-06-2024

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science

Abstract

Background. Quitting smoking is a challenge nowadays. Virtual coaches offer autonomous, personalized guidance for smoking cessation. However, such systems cannot replace human coaches completely. In situations, when human coaches cannot provide help to everyone - a virtual coach could follow a set of ethical principles to decide on who should get the feedback from a human.
Objective. Our study aims to identify users’ preferences on ethical principles that a virtual coach should follow to decide when to allocate human feedback to individuals preparing to quit smoking.
Methods. Our research was based on pre-gathered data, that included participants’ responses to open and closed questions regarding feedback allocation principles. Thematic analysis was conducted on these responses. Triangulation was performed using a qualitative literature review and quantitative data analysis.
Results. Four main themes were identified: (1) Struggling the Most (63.75%), (2) Increasing Chances of Success the Most (13.75%), (3) Equal Treatment (11.25%), and (4) Appreciating the Most (11.25%). Participants prioritized support for those experiencing the greatest difficulty in smoking cessation. The triangulation supported the validity of these themes.
Conclusions. Our study highlights the importance of integrating user-preferred ethical principles in virtual coaching systems for smoking cessation. Prioritization of users who struggle the most can increase the effectiveness and fairness of such systems, potentially increasing success rates. Future research should explore additional ethical principles, combining several principles into systems, and real-world application of these findings to further refine virtual coaching in healthcare.