Rigidized subscale kite wind tunnel test

Master Thesis (2024)
Author(s)

J.M. van Spronsen (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Contributor(s)

R. Schmehl – Mentor (TU Delft - Wind Energy)

J.A.W. Poland – Mentor (TU Delft - Wind Energy)

Alexander van Zuijlen – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Aerodynamics)

Mac Gaunaa – Mentor (Technical University of Denmark (DTU))

Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Graduation Date
17-10-2024
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Technical University of Denmark (DTU)
Programme
Aerospace Engineering | Wind Energy
Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of objects like the Kitepower V3A Leading Edge Inflatable (LEI) kite require accurate experimental data for validation. However, for these kites, particularly in steady-state simulations, such data is scarce. LEI kites are soft and deform continuously during flight, making validation complex. To address this, a unique experiment in the Open Jet Facility (OJF) at TU Delft, testing a rigidized subscale model of the V3A kite, marking the first wind tunnel test on a rigid kite.

The rigid model was made of carbon fiber reinforced polymer and mounted on a custom support structure that allowed adjustments to the kite’s angle of attack and sideslip. Aerodynamic forces and moments were measured at different wind speeds and orientations, with and without zigzag tape to study its effects on low Reynolds number flow.

The results were compared to existing CFD simulations, including Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and vortex step methods. The experimental data aligned well with these simulations at low Reynolds numbers, validating the setup. However, some discrepancies highlighted areas for improvement, such as reducing interference from the support structure and better matching Reynolds numbers between simulations and experiments.

Files

License info not available