The Influence of Surprise on Upset Recovery Performance in Airline Pilots

Journal Article (2017)
Author(s)

H.M. Landman (TNO, TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Eric Groen (TNO)

MM van Paassen (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

A Bronkhorst (TNO)

M Mulder (TU Delft - Control & Operations)

Research Group
Control & Simulation
Copyright
© 2017 H.M. Landman, Eric L. Groen, M.M. van Paassen, Adelbert Bronkhorst, Max Mulder
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2017.1365610
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 H.M. Landman, Eric L. Groen, M.M. van Paassen, Adelbert Bronkhorst, Max Mulder
Research Group
Control & Simulation
Issue number
1-2
Volume number
27
Pages (from-to)
2-14
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to test if performance of airline pilots, in performing an aerodynamic stall recovery procedure, decreases when they are surprised, compared to when they anticipate a stall event.
Background: New flight-safety regulations for commercial aviation recommend the introduction of surprise and startle in upset prevention and recovery training. This calls for more evidence on the effects of surprise on pilot performance, as well as methods to effectively induce surprise in training simulators.
Method: The study took place in a motion-base simulator with a poststall aerodynamic model. Using a within-subjects design, the recovery performance of 20 pilots was tested in 2 conditions: 1 anticipated condition, and 1 surprise condition. In addition to flight parameters, subjective and physiological data relating to surprise and startle were measured.
Results: Pilots had significantly more difficulties with adhering to the recovery procedure in the surprise condition compared to the anticipation condition. The subjective and physiological measures confirmed that the manipulation mainly increased surprise, and to a lesser extent also startle.
Conclusion: The results suggest that pilots have more difficulty in managing an upset situation (i.e., an aerodynamic stall) when this situation is presented unexpectedly, underlining that upset prevention and recovery training should include elements of surprise.

Files

License info not available