A Guide to Solving Pathfinding Problems with Multiple Agents

Student Report (2020)
Authors

V. Ionescu (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

M. van der Meer (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

B.T. van Kooten (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

G.W.K. Paardekooper (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

J. Teunissen (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Supervisors

Mathijs de Weerdt (TU Delft - Algorithmics)

J. Mulderij (TU Delft - Algorithmics)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Copyright
© 2020 Victor Ionescu, Mike van der Meer, Bram van Kooten, Gijs Paardekooper, Jasper Teunissen
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Victor Ionescu, Mike van der Meer, Bram van Kooten, Gijs Paardekooper, Jasper Teunissen
Graduation Date
15-04-2020
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Currently, literature regarding Multiagent Path Finding (MAPF) does not give a broad enough overview of all the different approaches. Many papers are hard to read and require proper knowledge of MAPF. The goal of this report is to give a global overview of MAPF. To achieve this goal, we provide a detailed explanation of what MAPF problems look like, as well as giving a clear overview of the strength and weaknesses of different solutions. Besides this theoretical analysis, we also analyse and critique benchmarking performed by other researchers. Following all this, we conclude that the field of MAPF lacks agreement on terminology. Furthermore, performance analysis is limited to researchers choice, skewing research in their own favour.

Files

MAPF_report_final.pdf
(pdf | 3.96 Mb)
License info not available