Life Cycle Assessment of Alternative Traction Options for Non-Electrified Regional Railway Lines
Marko Kapetanović (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)
AA Núñez (TU Delft - Railway Engineering)
Niels van Oort (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)
Rob M. P. Goverde (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
The railway sector is facing significant challenges in addressing the increasing concerns related to climate change, environmental pollution and scarcity of resources. This especially applies to often non-electrified regional railway networks, with passenger services provided by diesel-driven vehicles. Innovative propulsion system concepts offer significant improvement of energy efficiency and reduction of overall environmental impact from train operation. This study presents a life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions linked to the implementation of alternative powertrain systems in conventional diesel-electric multiple-unit vehicles employed on the regional railway lines in the northern Netherlands. The analysis encompassed the retrofit of a standard vehicle to its hybrid-electric, fuel cell-electric and battery-electric counterparts, and a comparative assessment of life cycle emissions during a ten-year time horizon. Results indicated significant impact of the production pathway for alternative energy carriers to diesel, namely hydrogen and electricity. The largest reduction in total emissions (96.80%) is obtained for a fuel cell-electric vehicle running on hydrogen produced from electrolysis, with slightly lower performance shown by the battery-electric configuration using green electricity produced from wind power (95.92%). Maintaining the diesel engine in the hybrid-electric alternative leads to a potential overall emission reduction of about 27%, as a result of improved fuel economy offered by the implemented energy storage system, and could be considered as a cost-effective transition solution towards carbon-neutral trains operation.