MORL4Water

A Modular Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning Toolkit for Water Resource Management

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

Zuzanna Osika (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Roxana Rădulescu (Universiteit Utrecht)

Jazmin Zatarain-Salazar (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Frans A. Oliehoek (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Pradeep K. Murukannaiah (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Research Group
Policy Analysis
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.65109/VSUW5215 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Policy Analysis
Pages (from-to)
1211-1220
Publisher
ACM
ISBN (electronic)
9798400723179
Event
25th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2026 (2026-05-25 - 2026-05-29), Paphos, Cyprus
Downloads counter
9
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Many real-world decision problems involve conflicting objectives. Multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) extends standard RL to optimize multiple objectives simultaneously, producing policy sets that capture different trade-offs. However, MORL research often relies on simplified benchmarks with limited real-world relevance. We present MORL4Water, a modular toolkit for creating realistic MORL environments in water resource management. Built on MO-Gymnasium, MORL4Water enables scenario construction from real data and systematic evaluation of MORL methods. We illustrate its use on the Nile and Susquehanna rivers, benchmarking several MORL algorithms against EMODPS, a domain-specific baseline. Beyond standard performance metrics, we analyze solution sets to reveal differences in exploration, scalability, and trade-off diversity. Our results show that most state-of-the-art MORL algorithms underperform relative to EMODPS, especially in higher-dimensional settings, and highlight the value of solution-set analysis for robust, real-world applications.