MORL4Water

A Modular Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning Toolkit for Water Resource Management

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

Zuzanna Osika (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Roxana Rădulescu (Universiteit Utrecht)

Jazmin Zatarain-Salazar (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Frans A. Oliehoek (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Pradeep K. Murukannaiah (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Research Group
Policy Analysis
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.65109/VSUW5215 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Policy Analysis
Pages (from-to)
1211-1220
Publisher
ACM
ISBN (electronic)
9798400723179
Event
25th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2026 (2026-05-25 - 2026-05-29), Paphos, Cyprus
Downloads counter
22
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Many real-world decision problems involve conflicting objectives. Multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) extends standard RL to optimize multiple objectives simultaneously, producing policy sets that capture different trade-offs. However, MORL research often relies on simplified benchmarks with limited real-world relevance. We present MORL4Water, a modular toolkit for creating realistic MORL environments in water resource management. Built on MO-Gymnasium, MORL4Water enables scenario construction from real data and systematic evaluation of MORL methods. We illustrate its use on the Nile and Susquehanna rivers, benchmarking several MORL algorithms against EMODPS, a domain-specific baseline. Beyond standard performance metrics, we analyze solution sets to reveal differences in exploration, scalability, and trade-off diversity. Our results show that most state-of-the-art MORL algorithms underperform relative to EMODPS, especially in higher-dimensional settings, and highlight the value of solution-set analysis for robust, real-world applications.