Alkali-activated concrete

Abstract

Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) consumption has grown nearly exponentially in the last twenty years. OPC has become the highest-volume manufactured product on the planet. Production of OPC is energy-intensive, consumes unrenewable natural resources and is one of the primary contributors to global warming (accounting for at least 5-8% of worldwide anthropogenic CO2 emissions). An alternative for OPC concrete is Alkali-Activated Concrete (AAC), for which Portland cement is completely substituted by an alternative binder. Instead of using OPC and water, precursors (raw materials) like Blast Furnace Slag (BFS) or Fly Ash (FA) are activated with an alkaline activator solution.
Although AAC seems to have promising qualities for structural application in terms of sustainability, worldwide use is not yet established. One of the reasons for this is the fact that there are no available regulations or codes to apply it, the material is relatively new and limited research has been conducted. For OPC concrete, the design codes are based on compressive strength at 28 days (strength at later ages stays either constant or is higher) and most other mechanical properties used in calculations are estimated based on this compressive strength. For AAC it is not yet sure if the same relations and assumptions as for OPC are also valid. First, because mechanical properties that have been reported for AAC in literature vary a lot, depending on mixture composition and curing conditions. Second, the long-term strength development of AAC is scarcely investigated and it is not clear if the compressive strength at 28 days can be used as a safe reference for design. Namely, a few researchers reported a decrease of strength or stiffness over time, for AAC mixtures that contain blast furnace slag. The observed decrease might not be a very desirable phenomenon and should be well-understood prior to wider structural application of AAC. Therefore, the main research question of this thesis is: Can a decrease of stiffness and strength over time, as sometimes reported in literature for AAC, also be found for AAC used at TU Delft and if so, what could be an explanation for this behaviour? Does the amount of BFS in the binder play a role, as a decrease over time has only been reported for AAC containing BFS? And if not, what other cause could lead to a decrease of properties over time? The intention is to make some first steps towards a better understanding of this phenomenon.
The research question is investigated in an experimental manner. Compressive strength, elastic modulus, splitting tensile strength and flexural strength are tested at different ages (28, 56 and 91 days) after being wet-cured (20°C and 95% RH) for 28 days. Two different AAC mixtures are investigated, S100 and S50, characterized by a BFS/FA binder ratio of 100:0 and 50:50 respectively. Furthermore, the flexural behaviour of reinforced beams is investigated by conducting four-point bending tests on both S100 and S50 concrete of two different ages (33/34 days and 69/70 days) and compared to an OPC concrete control beam.