The Influence of Open Circuit Potential on Electrode Dynamics

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Pierfrancesco Ombrini (TU Delft - RST/Storage of Electrochemical Energy)

Alexandros Vasileiadis (TU Delft - RST/Storage of Electrochemical Energy)

Marnix Wagemaker (TU Delft - RST/Storage of Electrochemical Energy)

Research Group
RST/Storage of Electrochemical Energy
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ae01df
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
RST/Storage of Electrochemical Energy
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository as part of the Taverne amendment. More information about this copyright law amendment can be found at https://www.openaccess.nl.Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.
Issue number
9
Volume number
172
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Phase separation, inducing a miscibility gap and non-monotonic open-circuit potential (OCP), is typical for widespread Li-ion battery electrodes such as LiFePO4, Li4Ti5OPhase separation, inducing a miscibility gap and non-monotonic open-circuit potential (OCP), is typical for widespread Li-ion battery electrodes such as LiFePO4, Li4Ti5O12 and Graphite. Although particle-scale effects of phase separation are well documented, its influence on transport-limited, porous electrodes remains largely overlooked. Here we embed physically consistent non-monotonic OCP profiles in a simplified Doyle–Fuller–Newman framework to compare their behavior against that of solid- solution materials with monotonic OCPs. Our findings provide deeper and general understanding of the different electrode ensemble behavior of solid solution (monotonic OCP) and phase separating (non-monotonic OCP) electrode materials, demonstrating why larger miscibility gaps are associated with decreasing rate capabilities and electrode utilization, amplifying local current heterogeneity and electrolyte depletion. By contrast, simulations employing conventional flat, fitted OCPs mask these effects and overpredict performance—particularly under dynamic cycling protocols such as galvanostatic intermittent titration (GITT). Our results reveal why accounting for realistic OCPs is essential for reliable modelling of high-loading electrodes, providing fundamental understanding and guidance for model-driven design and control of next-generation batteries and Graphite. Although particle-scale effects of phase separation are well documented, its influence on transport-limited, porous electrodes remains largely overlooked. Here we embed physically consistent non-monotonic OCP profiles in a simplified Doyle–Fuller–Newman framework to compare their behavior against that of solid- solution materials with monotonic OCPs. Our findings provide deeper and general understanding of the different electrode ensemble behavior of solid solution (monotonic OCP) and phase separating (non-monotonic OCP) electrode materials, demonstrating why larger miscibility gaps are associated with decreasing rate capabilities and electrode utilization, amplifying local current heterogeneity and electrolyte depletion. By contrast, simulations employing conventional flat, fitted OCPs mask these effects and overpredict performance—particularly under dynamic cycling protocols such as galvanostatic intermittent titration (GITT). Our results reveal why accounting for realistic OCPs is essential for reliable modelling of high-loading electrodes, providing fundamental understanding and guidance for model-driven design and control of next-generation batteries..

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 17-03-2026