Integrating Rational and Emotional Risk Management: A Stepwise Approach and Practical Implications

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Y. Xu (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

G.L.L.M.E. Reniers (Universiteit Antwerpen, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

M. Yang (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Safety and Security Science
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2025.02.004 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Safety and Security Science
Journal title
Journal of Safety Science and Resilience
Article number
100203
Downloads counter
65
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Decisions in complex systems need support from formal risk management. Traditional risk management, based on a "rational" idea of risk (the actual damage linked with probabilities), often diverges from public perceptions, leading to conflicts between expert-led evaluations and societal acceptance. Two research directions have emerged to bridge this gap: enhancing stakeholder participation in risk management, and incorporating emotional factors into risk assessment. Building on these efforts, we propose a systematic methodology integrating stakeholders' emotional considerations into formal risk management. Our approach combines a refined risk conceptualization with a structured stakeholder engagement process. An illustrative example involving an ammonia plant site-selection risk problem is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach. The proposed approach offers a potential way to resolve conflicts and enhance public trust in risk management.