The Effectiveness of a Mnemonic-Type Startle and Surprise Management Procedure for Pilots

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Annemarie Landman (TU Delft - Control & Simulation, TNO)

Sophie H. van Middelaar (Student TU Delft)

Eric Groen (TNO)

MM van Paassen (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Adelbert W. Bronkhorst (TNO)

M Mulder (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Research Group
Control & Simulation
Copyright
© 2020 H.M. Landman, Sophie H. van Middelaar, Eric L. Groen, M.M. van Paassen, Adelbert W. Bronkhorst, Max Mulder
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/24721840.2020.1763798
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 H.M. Landman, Sophie H. van Middelaar, Eric L. Groen, M.M. van Paassen, Adelbert W. Bronkhorst, Max Mulder
Research Group
Control & Simulation
Issue number
3-4
Volume number
30
Pages (from-to)
104-118
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: Mnemonic-type startle and surprise procedures were previously proposed to help pilots cope with startle and surprise in-flight, but effects on performance after procedure execution have not yet been investigated. Objective: Thus, we tested the effectiveness a new mnemonic-type procedure in a moving-base simulator with a non-linear model of a small twin-propeller aircraft flown single-pilot. Method: An experimental group of twelve line pilots was trained to use a four-item procedure: 1. Calm down: take a deep breath, sit up straight and relax shoulders and hands. 2. Observe: call out the basic flight parameters. 3. Outline: formulate a hypothesis about the problem. 4. Lead: formulate and execute a plan of action. A control group of twelve line pilots received a control training. Next, all pilots performed four scenarios with startling and surprising events. Data were obtained on pilot performance, stress, procedure application and evaluation. Results: Application of the procedure in the test scenarios was high (90.0% full, 100.0% partly), and pilots evaluated the procedure positively (median: 4 on a 1–5 point scale). There was significantly superior decision-making in the experimental group, but immediate responses were significantly less optimal. Pilots sometimes applied the procedure at inappropriate moments. Conclusion: The results of the tested mnemonic-type procedure were promising. The procedure may benefit, however, from modifications to reduce complexity and to stimulate application at the appropriate moment.

Files

License info not available