Selecting a suitable battery technology for the photovoltaic battery integrated module

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Victor Vega Garita (University of Costa Rica, TU Delft - DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage)

Ali Hanif (Student TU Delft)

Nishant Narayan (TU Delft - DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage)

Laura Ramirez-Elizondo (TU Delft - DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage)

P Bauera (TU Delft - DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage)

Research Group
DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage
Copyright
© 2019 V.E. Vega Garita, Ali Hanif, N.S. Narayan, L.M. Ramirez Elizondo, P. Bauer
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227011
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 V.E. Vega Garita, Ali Hanif, N.S. Narayan, L.M. Ramirez Elizondo, P. Bauer
Research Group
DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage
Volume number
438
Pages (from-to)
1-11
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The use of batteries is indispensable in stand-alone photovoltaic (PV) systems, and the physical integration of a battery pack and a PV panel in one device enables this concept while easing the installation and system scaling. However, the influence of high temperatures is one of the main challenges of placing a solar panel close to a battery pack. Therefore, this paper aims to select a suitable battery technology considering the temperature of operation and the expected current profiles. The methodology for battery selection is composed of a literature review, an integrated model, the design of an application-based testing, and the execution of the aging test. The integrated model was employed to choose among the battery technologies, and to design a testing procedure that simulated the operational conditions of the PV-battery Integrated Module (PBIM). Two Li-ion pouch cells were tested at two representative temperatures while applying various charging/discharging profiles. After the testing, the LiFePO4 (LFP) cells showed better performance when compared to LiCoO2 batteries (LCO), where for instance, the LCO cells capacity tested at 45∘C, faded 2,45% more than the LFP cells at the same testing conditions. Therefore, LFP cells are selected as a suitable option to be part of the PBIM.