Selecting a suitable battery technology for the photovoltaic battery integrated module

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Victor Vega Garita (University of Costa Rica, TU Delft - DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage)

Ali Hanif (Student TU Delft)

Nishant Narayan (TU Delft - DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage)

Laura Ramirez Elizondo (TU Delft - DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage)

Pavol Bauer (TU Delft - DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage)

Research Group
DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227011
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Research Group
DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage
Journal title
Journal of Power Sources
Volume number
438
Article number
227011
Pages (from-to)
1-11
Downloads counter
275
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The use of batteries is indispensable in stand-alone photovoltaic (PV) systems, and the physical integration of a battery pack and a PV panel in one device enables this concept while easing the installation and system scaling. However, the influence of high temperatures is one of the main challenges of placing a solar panel close to a battery pack. Therefore, this paper aims to select a suitable battery technology considering the temperature of operation and the expected current profiles. The methodology for battery selection is composed of a literature review, an integrated model, the design of an application-based testing, and the execution of the aging test. The integrated model was employed to choose among the battery technologies, and to design a testing procedure that simulated the operational conditions of the PV-battery Integrated Module (PBIM). Two Li-ion pouch cells were tested at two representative temperatures while applying various charging/discharging profiles. After the testing, the LiFePO4 (LFP) cells showed better performance when compared to LiCoO2 batteries (LCO), where for instance, the LCO cells capacity tested at 45∘C, faded 2,45% more than the LFP cells at the same testing conditions. Therefore, LFP cells are selected as a suitable option to be part of the PBIM.