REPAiR: REsource Management in Peri-urban AReas: Going Beyond Urban Metabolism
D3.3 Process model for the two pilot cases: Amsterdam, the Netherlands & Naples, Italy
Bob Geldermans (TU Delft - Climate Design and Sustainability)
Alexander Wandl (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)
Michelle Steenmeijer (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)
Cecilia Furlan (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)
Tamara Streefland
Enrico Formato (Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II)
Maria Cerreta (Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II)
Libera Amenta (Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)
Viktor Varju (Hungarian Academy of Sciences)
Pasquale Inglese (Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II)
Silvia Iodice (Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II)
Gilda Berruti (Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II)
Viktor Varju (Hungarian Academy of Sciences)
Zoltan Grünhut (Hungarian Academy of Sciences)
Akos Bodor (Hungarian Academy of Sciences)
Virág Lovász (Hungarian Academy of Sciences)
Zsombor Moticska (Hungarian Academy of Sciences)
Davide Tonini
Sue Ellen Taelman (Universiteit Gent)
More Info
expand_more
Abstract
Deliverable 3.3 of Work Package 3 concerns an integrated analysis of the two pilot case studies within the REPAiR project, Amsterdam and Naples, from the vantage point of waste production and processing, and the transition to circular societies. It comprises spatial, social and material flow analyses of the two pilot cases, whilst testing an innovative methodology that was introduced and explained in Deliverable 3.1 [D3.1, AKA the Handbook, Geldermans et al., 2017]. The report addresses additions and clarifications to the methodology presented in Deliverable 3.1. After an update on the basis of technical insights and the work developed in practice within the peri-urban living labs (PULL) workshops carried out so far, an improved classification of Wastescapes is presented. Furthermore, a complete process model to map Wastescapes is provided. A smaller scale of the 'sample' area has been introduced to allow a better interaction with the local stakeholders, deepening the context and cutting into the intermediate scale of the ‘focus-area’. Moreover, the notion of Enabling Contexts is applied to rationalise the links between spatial analysis and eco-innovation solutions (WP5). With regard to the Material Flow Analysis, new insights on data collection and processing are addressed, providing more grip on how to successfully conduct such an MFA. The lion’s share of the report is allocated to presenting the results. For both cases, a rudimentary spatial and socio-economic analysis on a national level precedes a detailed regional analysis: for the Netherlands, this concerns the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area, and for Italy the Campania Region and the Metropolitan region of Naples. Embedded in this spatial-social context, the material flow analysis follows six Activity-based Spatial MFA (as introduced in D3.1) steps to pinpoint and analyse waste related challenges and activities. The report finishes with a reflection on the methodology and results. This reflection focuses on four topics in particular: physico-geographical aspects and waste-sensitivity, Waste(scape) dynamics in space & time, modelling of material flows & data intensity, and the relevance of Enabling Contexts, whilst anticipating the follow up cases as well as a wider field of application.
No files available
Metadata only record. There are no files for this record.