A. Wandl
Please Note
66 records found
1
Deliverable 1.3: Synthesis research report
Democratising jUst Sustainability Transitions. DUST : Work Package 1, Task 1.3
The Delft scales to aspects circular built environment model
The result of two years of interdisciplinary discussions
From Contours to Constituencies
Reimagining Political Boundaries Through Land Use Clusters
Deliverable 6.3 : Academic dissemination plan
Democratising jUst Sustainability Transitions. DUST : Work Package 6, Task 6.3
Since the project started in February 2023 researchers at the DUST partner organisations have been working towards realizing these KPI’s. This deliverable therefore firstly presents achievements in terms of scientific publications so far, including already published journal articles, submitted journal articles, conference papers and presentations, as well as publication ideas that were launched by groups of researchers during related DUST project meetings. Drawing on these ongoing publication work as well as an intended comprehensive coverage of results from the different research activities in work packages (WPs) and tasks (Ts), the deliverable secondly identifies upcoming work to be done. This is presented in the form of agreed-upon lists of future publications. In conjunction these lists form the core of this final version of the DUST Academic dissemination plan.
Lastly, the deliverable presents guidelines for publication activities to guarantee reliability, honesty, respect, accountability, and inclusivity in the making use of the empirical data and knowledge that has been gathered during the project. A credit taxonomy is introduced as a specific instrument for determining co-authorship. Open science and acknowledgement practices as well as steps in bringing academic writing to publication are outlined. The realization of KPIs for academic dissemination largely falls outside of the duration of the DUST project. The plan therefore also introduces agreements that govern this post-project process. ...
Since the project started in February 2023 researchers at the DUST partner organisations have been working towards realizing these KPI’s. This deliverable therefore firstly presents achievements in terms of scientific publications so far, including already published journal articles, submitted journal articles, conference papers and presentations, as well as publication ideas that were launched by groups of researchers during related DUST project meetings. Drawing on these ongoing publication work as well as an intended comprehensive coverage of results from the different research activities in work packages (WPs) and tasks (Ts), the deliverable secondly identifies upcoming work to be done. This is presented in the form of agreed-upon lists of future publications. In conjunction these lists form the core of this final version of the DUST Academic dissemination plan.
Lastly, the deliverable presents guidelines for publication activities to guarantee reliability, honesty, respect, accountability, and inclusivity in the making use of the empirical data and knowledge that has been gathered during the project. A credit taxonomy is introduced as a specific instrument for determining co-authorship. Open science and acknowledgement practices as well as steps in bringing academic writing to publication are outlined. The realization of KPIs for academic dissemination largely falls outside of the duration of the DUST project. The plan therefore also introduces agreements that govern this post-project process.
Deliverable 4.4 : Evaluation and handbook of the Regional Futures Literacy Labs (RFLLs)
Democratising jUst Sustainability Transitions. DUST : Work Package 4, Task 4.6
In theoretical terms, the conception of RFLL format recognizes the importance of and challenges to citizen participation in place-based policymaking in the continuous, complex, and uncertain setting of sustainability transitions. Building on knowledge from the fields of public policy, spatial planning, spatial design, future studies, and democracy studies, the format emphasizes the role of anticipation and imagination, and reflexivity in the consideration of territorial, temporal, and organisation aspects of transitional development for policy learning, argumentation, and negotiation. The format also acknowledges that engaging a distinct LEC in public policymaking resembles the involvement of an ‘advocacy community’ or ‘advocacy coalition’, which requires particular attention to how community and policy fields of interest are thematically bounded, structured by narratives, and intersect. ...
In theoretical terms, the conception of RFLL format recognizes the importance of and challenges to citizen participation in place-based policymaking in the continuous, complex, and uncertain setting of sustainability transitions. Building on knowledge from the fields of public policy, spatial planning, spatial design, future studies, and democracy studies, the format emphasizes the role of anticipation and imagination, and reflexivity in the consideration of territorial, temporal, and organisation aspects of transitional development for policy learning, argumentation, and negotiation. The format also acknowledges that engaging a distinct LEC in public policymaking resembles the involvement of an ‘advocacy community’ or ‘advocacy coalition’, which requires particular attention to how community and policy fields of interest are thematically bounded, structured by narratives, and intersect.
Deliverable 4.3: Pol.is output: Rated statements on alternative community-led just sustainability transition policies
Democratising jUst Sustainability Transitions. DUST: Work Package 4, Task 4.5
The DUST experiments, which were run under the header Regional Futures Literacy Labs (RFLLs), tested the e-democracy tool Pol.is as part of a hybrid format combining digital and analogous design-led territorial participation instruments. The aim of testing was to increase our understanding of the complementarities between digital and analogue forms of participation, and of how these complementarities can be enhanced to increase the strategic positioning of communities’ interests in multi-level policymaking and democratic life at scale.
Between January and May 2025, DUST partners in the four RFLL case studies of Norrbotten (Sweden), Katowice (Poland), Lusatia (Germany), and Stara Zagora (Bulgaria) engaged with the Pol.is application during three stages. During the first preparation phase, the TUD Pol.is team educated RFLL case study partners on the use of the software, supported them in the preparation of input – the SSs, as well as opening statements and pages - for the application, and guided them in the preparation and first steps of a case-study-region-wide campaign to attract Pol.is users. In addition, the TUD Pol.is team prepared the application for use in technical terms (the application was hosted at TU Delft for data privacy and security reasons). During the second implementation phase, the collaboratively prepared seed statements (output of the third RFLL workshop) were set out in case study regions for digital deliberation. Case study partners monitored reactions to these statements, moderated deliberations if necessary, and further implemented the Pol.is information campaign. During the final assessment phase, the case study partners carried out a first quantitative assessment of Pol.is results in each case study region. Results of this assessment fed into a policy co-creation process in the RFLL WS 4. The data collection, which is presented in this deliverable, will finally feed into a comparative assessment of results per case study region, and an evaluation of Pol.is on its complementarity with other participatory RFLL tools and activities. ...
The DUST experiments, which were run under the header Regional Futures Literacy Labs (RFLLs), tested the e-democracy tool Pol.is as part of a hybrid format combining digital and analogous design-led territorial participation instruments. The aim of testing was to increase our understanding of the complementarities between digital and analogue forms of participation, and of how these complementarities can be enhanced to increase the strategic positioning of communities’ interests in multi-level policymaking and democratic life at scale.
Between January and May 2025, DUST partners in the four RFLL case studies of Norrbotten (Sweden), Katowice (Poland), Lusatia (Germany), and Stara Zagora (Bulgaria) engaged with the Pol.is application during three stages. During the first preparation phase, the TUD Pol.is team educated RFLL case study partners on the use of the software, supported them in the preparation of input – the SSs, as well as opening statements and pages - for the application, and guided them in the preparation and first steps of a case-study-region-wide campaign to attract Pol.is users. In addition, the TUD Pol.is team prepared the application for use in technical terms (the application was hosted at TU Delft for data privacy and security reasons). During the second implementation phase, the collaboratively prepared seed statements (output of the third RFLL workshop) were set out in case study regions for digital deliberation. Case study partners monitored reactions to these statements, moderated deliberations if necessary, and further implemented the Pol.is information campaign. During the final assessment phase, the case study partners carried out a first quantitative assessment of Pol.is results in each case study region. Results of this assessment fed into a policy co-creation process in the RFLL WS 4. The data collection, which is presented in this deliverable, will finally feed into a comparative assessment of results per case study region, and an evaluation of Pol.is on its complementarity with other participatory RFLL tools and activities.
Deliverable D4.2: Regional designs: Imagining community-led just sustainability transition policies
Democratising jUst Sustainability Transitions. DUST: Work Package 4, Task 4.3
The design of the visualisations drew on input from several RFLL activities and DUST tasks. In the RFLL workshop (WS) 2, communities discussed their expectations, hopes, and dreams in the context of their region’s sustainability transition. Inspired by the UNESCO Futures Literacy Lab format, the future perspectives were framed as probable and preferred futures. To emphasize the community lens, probable futures were later represented as a ‘head vs. the outside world’. To underline a territorial approach, preferred futures scenes were anchored in a geographic regional map. These two community perspectives were juxtaposed with a policy perspective. The policy perspective foresees the impact of a selection of current and upcoming place-based sustainability transition policies. To enhance comparison with LECs’ preferred futures, also this perspective was depicted in a regional geographic setting. The methods used for analysing the policy and the community perspectives, and the approach to creating the regional designs are described under the methodology chapter.
The output of T4.3 is a series of four triptychs representing and comparing the community and policy futures in the four case study regions where the RFLLs take place. Output was and will be used in several consecutive DUST activities. During the RFLL WS 3 communities co-created policy statements, which were further on opened for large-scale digital deliberation on the DUST Pol.is platform (T4.5). The regional designs were used to inspire the formulation of the statements, and for Pol.is information campaigns in digital and physical environments. Additionally, regional designs were also used for community storytelling in WS3: LECs were invited to take these as a starting point for telling stories about their regions. Beyond the RFLLs, the regional designs will be included in the DUST citizen position papers (D5.3), and displayed in several DUST exhibitions (WP6, T6.7). Exhibitions will be curated in all four CS regions, displaying the regional designs alongside explanatory text and audio-visual material. The exhibition material will also be promoted be used in other policy, academic and civic contexts concerned with discussing the role of communities in just sustainability transition policies. T4.6 will assess the different uses of the regional designs in and beyond the RFLLs. D4.4 will present the results from this analysis. ...
The design of the visualisations drew on input from several RFLL activities and DUST tasks. In the RFLL workshop (WS) 2, communities discussed their expectations, hopes, and dreams in the context of their region’s sustainability transition. Inspired by the UNESCO Futures Literacy Lab format, the future perspectives were framed as probable and preferred futures. To emphasize the community lens, probable futures were later represented as a ‘head vs. the outside world’. To underline a territorial approach, preferred futures scenes were anchored in a geographic regional map. These two community perspectives were juxtaposed with a policy perspective. The policy perspective foresees the impact of a selection of current and upcoming place-based sustainability transition policies. To enhance comparison with LECs’ preferred futures, also this perspective was depicted in a regional geographic setting. The methods used for analysing the policy and the community perspectives, and the approach to creating the regional designs are described under the methodology chapter.
The output of T4.3 is a series of four triptychs representing and comparing the community and policy futures in the four case study regions where the RFLLs take place. Output was and will be used in several consecutive DUST activities. During the RFLL WS 3 communities co-created policy statements, which were further on opened for large-scale digital deliberation on the DUST Pol.is platform (T4.5). The regional designs were used to inspire the formulation of the statements, and for Pol.is information campaigns in digital and physical environments. Additionally, regional designs were also used for community storytelling in WS3: LECs were invited to take these as a starting point for telling stories about their regions. Beyond the RFLLs, the regional designs will be included in the DUST citizen position papers (D5.3), and displayed in several DUST exhibitions (WP6, T6.7). Exhibitions will be curated in all four CS regions, displaying the regional designs alongside explanatory text and audio-visual material. The exhibition material will also be promoted be used in other policy, academic and civic contexts concerned with discussing the role of communities in just sustainability transition policies. T4.6 will assess the different uses of the regional designs in and beyond the RFLLs. D4.4 will present the results from this analysis.
Exploring a geodesign approach for circular economy transition of cities and regions
Three European cases
Despite the necessity for interdisciplinary and subsurface data, organizational, technological, and institutional barriers hinder the use of information models and standards in climate adaptation design. Currently, even though there are many subsurface models and standards available, the Netherlands lacks an integrated approach linking subsurface information models with local climate adaptation design. It also lacks an example of the use of standards to exchange planning information containing climate adaptation design interventions.
This research explores how subsurface data models can enhance urban climate adaptation design. By assessing existing models, it identifies data requirements for effective interventions based on Dutch policy documents. The paper introduces CLIMACAT, an online tool integrating subsurface information models and other crucial data in one online catalogue following FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) data principles, tested in four Utrecht neighborhoods.
The findings emphasize the importance of integrating subsurface information models into urban planning to achieve more effective and context-sensitive climate adaptation interventions. Significant barriers include data accessibility and standardization. New spatial plans were standardized using Land Administration Domain Model (LADM) Part 5 (ISO 19152-5), tailoring some attributes for climate adaptation design, facilitating cross-border information exchange. This approach addresses specific challenges in the Netherlands and provides a framework for international adoption, contributing to global urban climate adaptation efforts. The research highlights the need for accessible subsurface data and interdisciplinary collaboration, supported by continuous technological and policy advancements. ...
Despite the necessity for interdisciplinary and subsurface data, organizational, technological, and institutional barriers hinder the use of information models and standards in climate adaptation design. Currently, even though there are many subsurface models and standards available, the Netherlands lacks an integrated approach linking subsurface information models with local climate adaptation design. It also lacks an example of the use of standards to exchange planning information containing climate adaptation design interventions.
This research explores how subsurface data models can enhance urban climate adaptation design. By assessing existing models, it identifies data requirements for effective interventions based on Dutch policy documents. The paper introduces CLIMACAT, an online tool integrating subsurface information models and other crucial data in one online catalogue following FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) data principles, tested in four Utrecht neighborhoods.
The findings emphasize the importance of integrating subsurface information models into urban planning to achieve more effective and context-sensitive climate adaptation interventions. Significant barriers include data accessibility and standardization. New spatial plans were standardized using Land Administration Domain Model (LADM) Part 5 (ISO 19152-5), tailoring some attributes for climate adaptation design, facilitating cross-border information exchange. This approach addresses specific challenges in the Netherlands and provides a framework for international adoption, contributing to global urban climate adaptation efforts. The research highlights the need for accessible subsurface data and interdisciplinary collaboration, supported by continuous technological and policy advancements.
Deliverable D4.1: Spatial representation of the just sustainability transition policy context in case study regions
Democratising jUst Sustainability Transitions. DUST: Work Package 4, Task 4.2
The context mapping performed in Task 4.2 has been carried out to foresee the impact of ongoing and upcoming just sustainability transition measures in case study regions. A consistent and comprehensible spatial representation of impact is constituted via the use of an adapted version of the Territorial capital (TC) framework developed by Orsi et al. (2022). To achieve output, a Geographic information systems (GIS) application was used to create a geographic database that collects and combines data on the thematic key issues that are identified in relevant policy documents. This database constitutes the deliverable (D) 4.1.
Task 4.2 drew on the results of Tasks 3.1, 3.2, and 5.2.1. Results of the task in the form of maps and other visualisations will feed into Tasks 5.2 and 5.3 to support participants' interaction in the RFLLs. This deliverable D4.1 is a living database, including a supportive table titled Territorial Capital Catalogue (TCC), which introduces the identified capitals across policies and categorizes them based on our adapted framework. The database will be complemented and transformed as interaction in the RFLLs proceeds. ...
The context mapping performed in Task 4.2 has been carried out to foresee the impact of ongoing and upcoming just sustainability transition measures in case study regions. A consistent and comprehensible spatial representation of impact is constituted via the use of an adapted version of the Territorial capital (TC) framework developed by Orsi et al. (2022). To achieve output, a Geographic information systems (GIS) application was used to create a geographic database that collects and combines data on the thematic key issues that are identified in relevant policy documents. This database constitutes the deliverable (D) 4.1.
Task 4.2 drew on the results of Tasks 3.1, 3.2, and 5.2.1. Results of the task in the form of maps and other visualisations will feed into Tasks 5.2 and 5.3 to support participants' interaction in the RFLLs. This deliverable D4.1 is a living database, including a supportive table titled Territorial Capital Catalogue (TCC), which introduces the identified capitals across policies and categorizes them based on our adapted framework. The database will be complemented and transformed as interaction in the RFLLs proceeds.
A bottom-up ontology-based approach to monitor circular economy
Aligning user expectations, tools, data and theory
With circular economy being high on governmental agendas, there is an increasing request from governing bodies for circularity measurements. Yet, currently existing macro-level monitoring frameworks are widely criticized for not being able to inform the decision-making. The criticism includes, among others, a lack of consensus on terminologies and definitions among scholars, politicians, and practitioners, a lack of supporting data and tools and, consequently, a lack of transparency and trustworthiness. To address those needs, a bottom-up approach to build a shared terminology is suggested as a starting point for monitoring development. The government, data providers, and tool developers are involved in the process of formal ontology development and alignment. The experiment builds upon a use case of the Amsterdam Circular Economy Monitor (2020). First, four ontology development approaches are used to create a theory-centered, a user-centered, a tool-centered, and a data-centered ontology. The ontologies are later compared, merged, and aligned to arrive at one single ontology which forms the basis of the circular economy monitor. The notes taken during the process have revealed that next to a material flow model, typical of socioeconomic metabolism analysis, policy makers are concerned with actors (i.e., institutions, companies, or groups of people) who participate in the analyzed processes and services. Furthermore, a number of terms used by the decision-makers lack clear definitions and references to be directly associated with the available data. Finally, a structured terminology alignment process between monitor users, developers, and data providers helps in exposing terminology conflicts and ambiguities.
Planning for Change
A Methodological Framework for Integrating Circularity at TU Delft's Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment Curricula.