Adaptive User Feedback for IR-Based Traceability Recovery

Conference Paper (2015)
Author(s)

Annibale Panichella (TU Delft - Software Engineering)

Andrea De Lucia (University of Salerno)

Andy Zaidman (TU Delft - Software Engineering)

Department
Software Technology
Copyright
© 2015 A. Panichella, Andrea De Lucia, A.E. Zaidman
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/SST.2015.10
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2015
Language
English
Copyright
© 2015 A. Panichella, Andrea De Lucia, A.E. Zaidman
Department
Software Technology
Pages (from-to)
15-21
ISBN (electronic)
9780769555935
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Trace ability recovery allows software engineers to understand the interconnections among software artefacts and, thus, it provides an important support to software maintenance activities. In the last decade, Information Retrieval (IR) has been widely adopted as core technology of semi-automatic tools to extract trace ability links between artefacts according to their textual information. However, a widely known problem of IR-based methods is that some artefacts may share more words with non-related artefacts than with related ones. To overcome this problem, enhancing strategies have been proposed in literature. One of these strategies is relevance feedback, which allows to modify the textual similarity according to information about links classified by the users. Even though this technique is widely used for natural language documents, previous work has demonstrated that relevance feedback is not always useful for software artefacts. In this paper, we propose an adaptive version of relevance feedback that, unlike the standard version, considers the characteristics of both (i) the software artefacts and (ii) the previously classified links for deciding whether and how to apply the feedback. An empirical evaluation conducted on three systems suggests that the adaptive relevance feedback outperforms both a pure IR-based method and the standard feedback.

Files

PanichellaSST2015.pdf
(pdf | 1.26 Mb)
License info not available