Fully implicit, stabilised, three-field material point method for dynamic coupled problems

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Xiangcou Zheng (TU Delft - Geo-engineering)

F Pisano (TU Delft - Geo-engineering)

PJ Vardon (TU Delft - Geo-engineering)

MA Hicks (TU Delft - Geo-engineering)

Geo-engineering
Copyright
© 2022 X. Zheng, F. Pisano, P.J. Vardon, M.A. Hicks
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01678-7
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 X. Zheng, F. Pisano, P.J. Vardon, M.A. Hicks
Geo-engineering
Issue number
6
Volume number
38
Pages (from-to)
5583-5602
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This study presents the formulation and implementation of a fully implicit stabilised Material Point Method (MPM) for dynamic problems in two-phase porous media. In particular, the proposed method is built on a three-field formulation of the governing conservation laws, which uses solid displacement, pore pressure and fluid displacement as primary variables (u–p–U formulation). Stress oscillations associated with grid-crossing and pore pressure instabilities near the undrained/incompressible limit are mitigated by implementing enhanced shape functions according to the Generalised Interpolation Material Point (GIMP) method, as well as a patch recovery of pore pressures – from background nodes to material points – based on the same Moving Least Square Approximation (MLSA) approach investigated by Zheng et al. [1]. The accuracy and computational convenience of the proposed method are discussed with reference to several poroelastic verification examples, spanning different regimes of material deformation (small versus large) and dynamic motion (slow versus fast). The computational performance of the proposed method in combination with the PARDISO solver for the discrete linear system is also compared to explicit MPM modelling [1] in terms of accuracy, convergence rate, and computation time.