Modelling of deformation and fracture for a model quasi-brittle material with controlled porosity: Synthetic versus real microstructure

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

Branko Savija (TU Delft - Materials and Environment)

G.E. Smith (University of Bristol)

Dong Liu (University of Bristol, University of Oxford)

E. Schlangen (TU Delft - Materials and Environment)

P.E.J. Flewitt (University of Bristol)

Research Group
Materials and Environment
Copyright
© 2018 B. Šavija, G.E. Smith, D Liu, E. Schlangen, P.E.J. Flewitt
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.11.008
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 B. Šavija, G.E. Smith, D Liu, E. Schlangen, P.E.J. Flewitt
Research Group
Materials and Environment
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Volume number
205
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Deformation and fracture of materials are usually considered in terms of brittle and ductile modes. However, there is an intermediate class between these limits that is termed quasi-brittle where there is measurable inelastic deformation prior to final graceful ‘brittle’ failure. In previous work, we presented deformation and fracture data obtained tests conducted using a model material containing different known amounts of up to about 30% surrogate porosity. The model material is a hemi-hydrate gypsum plaster with additions of expanded polystyrene beads in the size range 1.5–2.0 mm dia. Use of gypsum plaster and artificial “pores” enabled creating a simple brittle model material with isolated pores randomly distributed and their size and geometry controlled. Herein, a comparison between two ways of generating microstructures for computer modelling of deformation and fracture of the model material is presented. The predictions for the computer model have been based upon two microstructure inputs (i) a synthetic 3-D pore model and (ii) measurements of porosity obtained from computed X-ray tomography images of the test material. Predictions of the elastic modulus and tensile strength for the different amount of porosity are compared between the two computer models and the experimental flexural data. The predicted deformation and fracture characteristics that describe the observed quasi- brittle response measured for the model material are discussed.

Files

1_s2.0_S0013794418304776_main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 9.39 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 06-05-2019
License info not available