Techno-economic analysis of catalytic methane pyrolysis in a fluidized bed reactor with reactor-scale catalyst deactivation modeling

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

P.B. Tamarona (TU Delft - Engineering Thermodynamics)

Tim M.J. Nijssen (TU Delft - Engineering Thermodynamics)

T.J.H. J. H. Vlugt (TU Delft - Engineering Thermodynamics)

Mahinder Ramdin (TU Delft - Engineering Thermodynamics)

Research Group
Engineering Thermodynamics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.167134
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Engineering Thermodynamics
Volume number
522
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Methane pyrolysis is a promising route for low-emission hydrogen (H2) production, with solid carbon as a potentially valuable byproduct. Despite this potential, the economic feasibility of Catalytic Methane Pyrolysis (CMP) with fluidized bed reactors (FBR) has been insufficiently studied. This study develops a conceptual CMP plant using two novel isothermal reactor models—based on continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) and plug-flow reactor (PFR) assumptions—to represent the operational extremes of FBRs. Our reactor models incorporate reaction and catalyst deactivation kinetics from experiments with nickel-supported catalysts, and the framework enables process simulations that account for the catalyst rate required to sustain reactor activity. These models address the lack of proper reduced-order FBR models and the reliance on oversimplified assumptions in the literature. In the baseline scenario, the conceptual plant yields an LCOH ranging from $3.89 to $4.79 per kilogram, defining the expected cost bounds for an FBR-based CMP plant. At a H2 selling price of $5.00 per kilogram, the process achieves favorable payback time and net present value. Monte Carlo and sensitivity analyses indicate that CMP remains cost-competitive under economic uncertainties. Increased carbon sales could make CMP more economical than steam methane reforming, while unsold byproducts may incur costly sequestration. Reactor heating assessment shows methane combustion with carbon capture minimizes both cost and emissions. Overall, this work demonstrates the economic potential of CMP for H2 production and provides a practical modeling framework for process evaluation.