Print Email Facebook Twitter Gas bubble removal from a zero-gap alkaline electrolyser with a pressure swing and why foam electrodes might not be suitable at high current densities Title Gas bubble removal from a zero-gap alkaline electrolyser with a pressure swing and why foam electrodes might not be suitable at high current densities Author Bleeker, J.J. (TU Delft ChemE/Transport Phenomena) van Kasteren, Celine (Student TU Delft) van Ommen, J.R. (TU Delft ChemE/Product and Process Engineering) Vermaas, D.A. (TU Delft ChemE/Transport Phenomena) Date 2024 Abstract To make green hydrogen more economically attractive, the energy losses in alkaline electrolysis need to be minimized while operating at high current densities (1 A cm−2). At these current densities the ohmic resistance and gas bubbles effects contribute largely to the energy losses. To mitigate the gas bubbles losses, we demonstrate, for the first time, a pressure swing to remove gas bubbles in a zero-gap alkaline water electrolyzer. The pressure swing leverages the ideal gas law to increase the volume of gas in the system periodically, for a short duration (<2 s). This temporal volume increase effectively removes bubbles from the electrolyzer. We show that pressure swing can be used to measure the effect of bubbles on the ohmic resistance (RBubbles). Our results reveal that foam electrodes have a significantly larger RBubbles than perforated plate electrodes (1.8 Ω cm2 vs 0.3 Ω cm2). The time-averaged cell voltage reduces by 170 mV when applying pressure swings to an electrolyzer operating at 200 mA cm−2 in 1 M KOH with foam electrodes. The bubble resistance further depends on the electrolyte conductivity (inversely proportional) and is only moderately affected by operating pressure (25 % lower when increasing pressure amplitude from 1–2 to 1–5 bar). By implementing these findings in a model, we estimate that the pressure swing could reduce the cell voltage by ∼0.1 V for an electrolyzer operating at industrial conditions (6 M KOH, 80 °C, 1 A cm−2) for foam electrodes. For perforated plate electrodes, however, the reduced cell voltage is lower and does not outweigh the additional compression energy. Subject Alkaline water electrolysisGas bubblesHydrogenPressurizedZero-gap To reference this document use: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:6d851c18-203b-4c97-a56c-99ba178cbcbd DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.147 ISSN 0360-3199 Source International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 57, 1398-1407 Part of collection Institutional Repository Document type journal article Rights © 2024 J.J. Bleeker, Celine van Kasteren, J.R. van Ommen, D.A. Vermaas Files PDF 1-s2.0-S0360319924001551-main.pdf 6.97 MB Close viewer /islandora/object/uuid:6d851c18-203b-4c97-a56c-99ba178cbcbd/datastream/OBJ/view