E. Kementzetzidis
Please Note
15 records found
1
Centrifuge testing and numerical modelling of cyclically loaded monopiles in clay
Setup and early findings of the MIDASclay project
Site liquefaction analysis via the contour diagram method
Implications for offshore monopile design
Seismic soil-monopile-structure interaction for offshore wind turbines
From 3D to 1D modelling
To accommodate the foreseen expansion of the offshore wind sector, monopile-supported Offshore Wind Turbines (OWTs) are currently being designed for harvesting offshore wind energy in seismically active regions. Three-dimensional (3D) Finite Element (FE) analyses have proven a reliable, though computationally expensive, tool for modelling laterally loaded monopiles. A more efficient modelling approach is the one-dimensional (1D) Beam-on-Winkler-Foundation (BWF) method, where the monopile is modelled via a series of beam elements, laterally supported by uncoupled, lateral soil springs. Under the simplifying assumption of linear elastic soil behaviour, this study explores the suitability of the BWF method for the simulation of the seismic soil-structure interaction by comparing the response obtained through 1D modelling to the outcome of 3D FE calculations. To this end, different monopile geometries are examined, for which the contributions of multiple soil resisting mechanisms (determined by normal and tangential stresses along the pile shaft and base) to the global monopile response are also assessed.
The vibratory installation of monopiles as foundation for offshore wind turbines is considered a plausible solution next to the conventional installation method (impact-hammering). One of the main advantages is the lower noise emissions, reducing harm to the marine life. However, knowledge on the effects of the vibratory installation parameters on the lateral response of monopiles – and how these effects differ from those caused by impact-driving – is limited. This paper presents the results from an ongoing Joint Industry Project (SIMOX) with focus on 1g laboratory tests carried out in a 9.0m x 5.5m x 2.5m tank with saturated sand at Deltares, the Netherlands. The tests involve the installation (impact and vibratory) of scaled piles with 32 cm diameter, embedment length of 1.5 m and two wall thicknesses. The lateral loading regime consisted of monotonic and cyclic lateral loading. The results show the effect of soil density and different installation parameters of vibratory installation on the lateral response of the piles compared to a conventional impact installation.
The post-installation performance of piles installed with a novel driving method
Field tests and numerical modelling
Cyclic behaviour of laterally loaded (mono)piles in sand
With emphasis on pile driving effects
In an attempt to accelerate the growth of offshore wind, the Netherlands, country of origin of this study, has supported several research initiatives to reduce the engineering and manufacturing costs for the prevalent offshore wind foundation in the country (the monopile). This study elaborates upon the experimental findings of two major research projects, namely the DISSTINCT (2014-2018) and the Gentle Driving of Piles (2018-2022) projects, each designed to address specific technical uncertainties associated with the foundation concept. The DISSTINCT project (launched in 2014) aimed to improve the understanding of the natural frequency of installed monopiles as well as the engineering procedures used in the identification thereof. By conducting experiments at full scale on a monopile installed in the IJsselmeer lake in the Netherlands, the experimental campaign produced invaluable data on the dynamic response of monopiles during small amplitude lateral vibrations. Later, the GDP project (launched in 2018) was designed to propose, engineer, and demonstrate a novel monopile installation procedure, foreseen to alleviate most of the aforementioned installation-related challenges; the Gentle Driving of Piles (GDP) method. Moreover, the project would provide answers to questions concerning the long-term response of (mono)piles in sandy soils, relative to the installation method. For these reasons, an extensive experimental campaign was conducted in the port of Rotterdam (Maasvlakte II), where a total of 9 piles were driven into the sandy Maasvlakte soil via different driving procedures, namely with the established impact hammering, the traditional axial vibro-driving, and the new GDP method. Subsequently, the cyclic lateral performance for four of these piles (which were heavily instrumented), was evaluated via an elaborate 82.000 load cycle (≈42 hours) loading programme of slow (0.1 Hz) high amplitude, and fast (0.1 - 4 Hz) low amplitude cyclic force applied to the (mono)piles' head.
This study elaborates and builds upon experimental findings from the above-mentioned test campaigns. These measurements were first carefully examined, and later interpreted using a variety of modelling tools (both 1D and 3D FE modelling) formulated and adapted to meet the particular geotechnical and loading challenges of the examined fieldwork. Enabled by the diversity of the field and numerical work performed, this study addresses a number of engineering challenges and knowledge gaps related to the design of monopiles, namely i) their post-installation resonance frequency, ii) the long-term response to environmental loading, and iii) the impact of the installation method on the long-term operations. In particular, 3D FE modelling was adopted to successfully simulate the dynamic response of the examined monopile in the DISSTINCT project. The modelling efforts enabled the interpretation of the field test measurements, and in turn, inspired confidence in the suitability of available simulation tools to identify the resonance frequencies of monopile foundations, and accurately calculate dynamic soil-monopile interactions. For the interpretation of the GDP field test data, 1D FE modelling was employed. In the field, the elaborate lateral loading programme returned a fairly complex cyclic pile response, with pronounced differences in the performance of piles installed by different installation methods. The particular geotechnical conditions at the GDP site, i.e., site inhomogeneity and the 4 m deep unsaturated topsoil, prevented the direct comparison of the installation methods. This was later achieved through the formulation of a cyclic soil reaction p-y model able to simulate soil ratcheting and gapping effects. The results provided rich insights into the impact of relevant installation effects on the cyclic pile response on many loading cycles and indicated that the GDP-installed piles performed excellent overall in lateral cyclic loading. ...
In an attempt to accelerate the growth of offshore wind, the Netherlands, country of origin of this study, has supported several research initiatives to reduce the engineering and manufacturing costs for the prevalent offshore wind foundation in the country (the monopile). This study elaborates upon the experimental findings of two major research projects, namely the DISSTINCT (2014-2018) and the Gentle Driving of Piles (2018-2022) projects, each designed to address specific technical uncertainties associated with the foundation concept. The DISSTINCT project (launched in 2014) aimed to improve the understanding of the natural frequency of installed monopiles as well as the engineering procedures used in the identification thereof. By conducting experiments at full scale on a monopile installed in the IJsselmeer lake in the Netherlands, the experimental campaign produced invaluable data on the dynamic response of monopiles during small amplitude lateral vibrations. Later, the GDP project (launched in 2018) was designed to propose, engineer, and demonstrate a novel monopile installation procedure, foreseen to alleviate most of the aforementioned installation-related challenges; the Gentle Driving of Piles (GDP) method. Moreover, the project would provide answers to questions concerning the long-term response of (mono)piles in sandy soils, relative to the installation method. For these reasons, an extensive experimental campaign was conducted in the port of Rotterdam (Maasvlakte II), where a total of 9 piles were driven into the sandy Maasvlakte soil via different driving procedures, namely with the established impact hammering, the traditional axial vibro-driving, and the new GDP method. Subsequently, the cyclic lateral performance for four of these piles (which were heavily instrumented), was evaluated via an elaborate 82.000 load cycle (≈42 hours) loading programme of slow (0.1 Hz) high amplitude, and fast (0.1 - 4 Hz) low amplitude cyclic force applied to the (mono)piles' head.
This study elaborates and builds upon experimental findings from the above-mentioned test campaigns. These measurements were first carefully examined, and later interpreted using a variety of modelling tools (both 1D and 3D FE modelling) formulated and adapted to meet the particular geotechnical and loading challenges of the examined fieldwork. Enabled by the diversity of the field and numerical work performed, this study addresses a number of engineering challenges and knowledge gaps related to the design of monopiles, namely i) their post-installation resonance frequency, ii) the long-term response to environmental loading, and iii) the impact of the installation method on the long-term operations. In particular, 3D FE modelling was adopted to successfully simulate the dynamic response of the examined monopile in the DISSTINCT project. The modelling efforts enabled the interpretation of the field test measurements, and in turn, inspired confidence in the suitability of available simulation tools to identify the resonance frequencies of monopile foundations, and accurately calculate dynamic soil-monopile interactions. For the interpretation of the GDP field test data, 1D FE modelling was employed. In the field, the elaborate lateral loading programme returned a fairly complex cyclic pile response, with pronounced differences in the performance of piles installed by different installation methods. The particular geotechnical conditions at the GDP site, i.e., site inhomogeneity and the 4 m deep unsaturated topsoil, prevented the direct comparison of the installation methods. This was later achieved through the formulation of a cyclic soil reaction p-y model able to simulate soil ratcheting and gapping effects. The results provided rich insights into the impact of relevant installation effects on the cyclic pile response on many loading cycles and indicated that the GDP-installed piles performed excellent overall in lateral cyclic loading.
Monopile-sand interaction under lateral cyclic loading
Simulation of centrifuge test data using a cyclic 1D p-y model
The response of monopiles to lateral loading has attracted considerable research interest in recent years. As monopile foundations are exposed to ever-harsher environmental conditions, the engineering tools used for their simulation should continually update and improve. Recently, the challenge of simulating the behaviour of monopiles under lateral loads has been addressed to a significant extent through a combination of numerical modelling and experimental data. Although monotonic response calculations are still relevant to monopile design, it should be acknowledged that offshore environmental loads are inherently cyclic. To improve the engineering tools for the simulation of cyclic monopile behaviour and our understanding of the relevant geotechnical mechanisms, this study presents and discusses the outcome of advanced 1D cyclic soil reaction modelling of monopile-soil interactions employed to simulate centrifuge data conducted as part of the MIDAS research project. The memory-enhanced p-y model proves capable of simulating cyclic ratcheting behaviour in complex loading histories, which promotes the discussion for the evolution of relevant soil reaction mechanisms during cyclic loads. Finally, preliminary calibration strategies for the employed cyclic soil reaction models are presented.
Gentle Driving of Piles at a Sandy Site Combining Axial and Torsional Vibrations
Quantifying the Influence of Pile Installation Method on Lateral Behavior
Gentle driving of piles (GDP) is a new technology for the vibratory installation of tubular (mono) piles that aims to achieve both efficient installation and low noise emission by combining axial and torsional vibrations. To provide a preliminary demonstration of the GDP concept, onshore medium-scale tests in sand were performed in late 2019 at the Maasvlakte II site in Rotterdam (Netherlands). Several piles were installed using both impact and vibratory driving methods (including GDP), with the twofold aim of comparatively assessing (1) the effectiveness of GDP; and (2) the presence of installation effects in the pile response to lateral loading. This work focuses on the latter aspect and presents a quantitative analysis of the installation effects observed in the pile loading test data recorded in the field. Due to soil inhomogeneity across the field, a purely data-based analysis would have not supported objective conclusions, which led to adoption of an alternative approach based on one-dimensional (1D) numerical modeling. To this end, an advanced cyclic p-y model was calibrated for the simulation of the reference pile loading tests, and the values of key parameters were compared to infer quantitative information about relevant installation effects. The results presented herein inform about the promising performance of the GDP method, particularly in comparison to traditional impact hammering. Although the cyclic lateral pile behavior proves affected by the installation process, certain important aspects of installation effects gradually diminish as more loading cycles are applied.
From cyclic sand ratcheting to tilt accumulation of offshore monopiles
3D FE modelling using SANISAND-MS
Serviceability criteria for offshore monopiles include the estimation of long-term, permanent tilt under repeated operational loads. In the lack of well-established analysis methods, experimental and numerical research has been carried out in the last decade to support the fundamental understanding of monopile-soil interaction mechanisms, and the conception of engineering methods for monopile tilt predictions. With a focus on the case of monopiles in sand, this work shows how step-by-step/implicit, three-dimensional (3D) finite-element (FE) modelling can be fruitfully applied to the analysis of cyclic monopile-soil interaction and related soil deformation mechanisms. To achieve adequate simulation of cyclic sand ratcheting and densification around the pile, the recently proposed SANISAND-MS model is adopted. The link between local soil behaviour and global monopile response to cyclic loading is discussed through detailed analysis of model prediction. Overall, the results of numerical parametric studies confirm that the proposed 3D FE modelling framework can reproduce relevant experimental evidence about monopile-soil interaction, and support future improvement of engineering design methods.
With the offshore wind industry rapidly expanding worldwide, geotechnical research is being devoted to foundation optimisation - most intensively for large-diameter monopiles. The analysis and design of monopiles still suffers from significant uncertainties in relation to cyclic/dynamic loading conditions. The aim of this work is to shed new light on dynamic soil-monopile interaction, based on the results of unique full-scale experiments performed at the Westermeerwind wind park (Netherlands). The response of a 24 m long, 5 m diameter monopile to harmonic lateral loading of varying amplitude and frequency is inspected. The analysis of original field measurements (soil accelerations and pore pressures) enables the lateral stiffness observed at the monopile head to be linked to dynamic effects occurring in the surrounding soil. The interpretation of measured data is supported by three-dimensional finite-element studies, also looking at the influence of drainage conditions and monopile size. The set of results presented supports the need for dynamics-based monopile design, as higher frequencies gain relevance in the most recent offshore wind developments.
A novel pile-driving technique, named Gentle Driving of Piles (GDP), that combines axial low-frequency and torsional high-frequency vibrations has been developed and tested recently. During the experimental campaign, several piles were installed onshore, making use of the GDP shaker. Besides those, a number of additional piles were installed using conventional pile-driving techniques, i.e. impact piling and axial vibratory driving. After the completion of the installation phase, the installed piles have been subjected to impact hammer tests with the following goals. First, the in-situ dynamic properties of the pile-soil system have been identified. Second, the post-installation soil state has been investigated, along with its evolution in time for each pile driving scenario. Preliminary analyses, of the data collected during the impact tests show dissimilar trends in the overall dynamic response between the piles installed with impact hammer and those installed with the axial and the GDP shakers.This observation suggests a difference in the post-installation dynamic behaviour of the pile-soil systems related to different pile-driving techniques. In this paper, a first attempt is made to identify the differences in the overall pile-soil dynamic behaviour of the piles installed by means of the three different pile-driving techniques.
The influence of different intensity earthquake records on the response of the OTW-monopile-soil system is examined both for horizontal and vertical seismic components. Even in a non-liquefiable site, pore pressure effects and their impact on the structural response are clearly visible in the simulation results. The likely coexistence of seismic and SLS wind/wave loading is also considered for completeness. ...
The influence of different intensity earthquake records on the response of the OTW-monopile-soil system is examined both for horizontal and vertical seismic components. Even in a non-liquefiable site, pore pressure effects and their impact on the structural response are clearly visible in the simulation results. The likely coexistence of seismic and SLS wind/wave loading is also considered for completeness.