Urbanization is putting more pressure on waste management infrastructures in cities, which could lead to “inadequate and overburdened infrastructure” according to the United Nations (United Nations Statistics Division, 2019). Because people play an important role in the performance of waste management systems, the systems should be inclusive to all people (Vasconcelos et al., 2021). As currently no method suffices in studying both inclusivity and circularity in waste management processes this study proposes the waste journey method. The waste journey method combines the customer journey theory and the theory of planned behavior and can be graphically presented as in Figure 1. In the waste journey method, the waste is followed from a waste perspective from actor to actor. In this journey the waste interacts with people, called touch points, who take certain actions that influence the circular performance of the waste management process. By mapping the waste management process and analyzing the arguments actors have for their actions, with the theory of planned behavior, the barriers, and opportunities for realizing inclusivity and circularity in a waste management process can be identified. The barriers and gaps that are identified with the waste journey method can contribute to the improvement of the waste management process. Besides, this method is one of the first to recognize the preparation phase as an important phase for the circular performance of the waste management process. A downside of the waste journey method is that it is a time-consuming method to use, and it requires the transparency and willingness of all actors in the waste management process. This was also experienced in the case study where one of the actors was not willing to cooperate and commercial actors were not transparent about their waste trading contracts. Furthermore, the interview protocol of this research could have been better specified for each actor. Future studies should focus on implementing this method on other waste streams and developing the definition of inclusivity and specifying it for each actor in the waste management process

The increasing generation of municipal solid waste (MSW) due to urbanization and population growth has highlighted the importance of effective Municipal solid waste management. Waste sorting plays a critical role in enhancing waste quality and boosting recycling rates, aligning with the circular economy goals of the European Union. However, despite significant waste production in cities, limited separation and recycling occur, primarily due to insufficient citizen involvement. When it comes to involving citizens in sorting household waste, there has been limited research and exploration of the waste sorting behavior of college students. Given that the majority of college students reside in student housing, the research aims to understand college students’ waste sorting behavior in student housing and recommend interventions that motivate students to engage in waste sorting. To attain the objective, the research utilized a mixed research approach, initially employing semi-structured interviews as the qualitative method and subsequently conducting an online survey as the quantitative method. Qualitative results were derived through the application of thematic analysis and subsequently served as a basis for constructing the questionnaire survey in the subsequent quantitative phase. The factors that impact waste sorting behavior in student housing were identified and quantified in the quantitative phase by employing the partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method. The results revealed that the subjective norm and perceived behavioral control directly impact students’ intentions to engage in waste sorting, which in turn, indirectly affects their waste sorting behavior. In addition, the waste sorting facilities and information publicity holds a significant influence on the students’ household waste sorting behavior. Based on the findings, it is suggested that the intervention aimed at encouraging waste sorting among students could involve enhancing the publicity of waste sorting information by providing information prompts in the communal space within student housing and distributing information through social media. Furthermore, interventions like improving the waste sorting facilities could engage students in waste sorting. Additionally, promoting communication within the student housing community and incorporating waste sorting education into the college curriculum were also suggested as interventions to incentivize students to sort their household waste.