Proof load testing on bridges requires high magnitude loads. Stop criteria are used to avoid irreversible damage or failure during proof load testing. These stop criteria are thresholds to measurable parameters during the test. After reaching a stop criterion, the proof load test needs to be terminated. While in the past, stop criteria have been identified as a single level, this research proposes to use a traffic light system for stop criteria: green light (related to the serviceability limit state), yellow light (as an intermediate level) and red light (further testing is not permitted). The green light relates to the development of cracking, whereas the yellow and red light relate to the failure modes of flexure and shear. To develop stop criteria for the brittle failure mode of shear, thresholds are derived from mechanical models, based on strain measurements and crack widths, as well as using acoustic emission measurements. To validate the stop criteria, three series of experiments are analyzed: reinforced concrete slab strips, straight slabs, and skewed slabs. While field validation of the traffic light system is pending, the developed tool is a step forward to safely test concrete bridges without shear reinforcement.

As the existing bridge stock is aging, assessment of existing bridges becomes increasingly important. In the Netherlands, the shear capacity of reinforced concrete slab bridges is found to be insufficient. In particular, the shear and punching shear capacity of reinforced concrete slab bridges subjected to concentrated loads from the design tandem or truck is subject to discussion, as the shear behavior is situated in between oneway and two-way shear. Currently, an experimental program is being conducted at Delft University of Technology to determine the shear capacity of straight and skewed reinforced concrete slabs under point loads near to the support. This paper presents the results of the 25 tests conducted on six straight slabs of 5m × 2.5 m × 0.3 m subjected to a proof load testing loading protocol. The failure load and modes of the slabs are described in detail. Reinforced concrete slabs under concentrated loads can fail in shear, punching, and flexure, as well as a combination of these failure modes. The results of the experiments are compared to strength predictions obtained by using current design models and current methods for assessment. These experiments demonstrated that the Dutch guidelines, which are based on previous slab experiments, are an improvement as compared to the Eurocode for the assessment of existing reinforced concrete slab bridges. Ultimately, this work provides recommendations for bridge engineers tasked to assess reinforced concrete skewed slab bridges.

Proof load testing for assessment can involve a large risk due to the high loads. Stop criteria can reduce this risk. Stop criteria are necessary for shear, which is a brittle failure mode. This paper describes the development of shear stop criteria for slab strips. The shear stop criteria are developed by combining theoretical concepts related to cracking, as well the relationship between bending- and shear-critical regions, along with insights from the Critical Shear Crack Theory and the Critical Shear Displacement Theory. The shear stop criteria are validated with fourteen beam tests. The result is a set of shear stop criteria in a “traffic light system” with a green light level related to serviceability, and yellow and red light related to the ultimate limit state for shear. These stop criteria serve as the basis for a global approach for proof load testing of reinforced concrete bridges.

Nowadays, with the aging of the bridges and the advancements in technology, load testing has emerged as an effective method to assess existing concrete bridges with missing information, or where analytical methods do not provide an accurate assessment. Two types of load tests are identified: diagnostic load tests and proof load tests. Both rely on field measurements of parameters or structural responses of the bridge during the test. A diagnostic load test measures the response of the bridge so that analytical models can be calibrated and evaluated. In a proof load test, the bridge directly demonstrates that it can carry a certain load. Since large loads are applied, the bridge needs to be carefully monitored. In this case, monitoring the measurements provide a warning to avoid damage. This paper reviews the literature on reported load tests and the measurement techniques used during these tests. It also includes a review of traditional and recently developed sensing technologies. Finally, the measurement requirements for diagnostic and proof load tests are given as well as a flow chart to guide engineers in the selection process of appropriate monitoring and measurement techniques during load tests. This paper can serve engineers during the preparation of a load test.

Advanced monitoring methods are required to identify stop criteria in proof-load tests. In this study, the combined methodology of two-dimensional digital image correlation and acoustic emission is investigated for its applicability for future implementation in field tests. The two monitoring systems are deemed to provide valuable insight with external measurements from digital image correlation and internal measurements from acoustic emission. Two overturned T-section reinforced concrete slabs (0.37 × 1.7 × 8.4 m) tested under laboratory conditions are used for the assessment. The first slab test served as a preliminary test to enable sensor placement and creation of a relevant loading protocol. The main scientific results lead to a proposal for a test procedure using the combined methodology based on results, observations, and experiences from an individual stop criteria assessment for the two methods. The results include full-field plots, an investigation of the time of crack detection and monitoring of crack widths with digital image correlation, and a qualitative assessment of activity vs. load followed by a quantitative evaluation of calm ratios using acoustic emission. The individual results show that both digital image correlation and acoustic emission can identify damage occurrence earlier than other secondary methods. At crack detection (415 kN), crack widths were measured at widths between 0.078 mm to 0.125 mm and can be monitored until reaching the stop criterion at 463 kN (Eurocode SLS threshold of wmax = 0.2 mm). The acoustic emission results were limited by the pre-defined loading protocol and thus, only indicated that damage occurred sometime between 300 kN and 500 kN (pre-defined load levels). Therefore, the proposal for test procedure involves a methodology, where the loading protocol may be updated during testing based on monitoring results and thus provide even more valuable data.