A decades-long steady rise in air movements has disproportionally impacted airport-neighbouring communities. These communities bear the brunt of the aviation industry's air, and noise pollution, detrimental to their livelihood. Airports near densely populated areas face increasing societal and governmental scrutiny to reduce their noise pollution and improve the quality of life for airport-neighbouring communities. Airframe noise has become a prominent noise source during approach due to the increased usage of quieter high-bypass ratio turbofan engines. Flyover measurements suggest that the leading edge junction between the fuselage, wing, and slat is a high-intensity localised noise source. This airframe region has been sparsely researched. Therefore, this study aims to describe the relation between the aero-structural design of the fuselage-wing-slat junction and its aeroacoustic footprint for an aircraft in approach configuration.

The research set-up was designed for open-jet numerical simulations using the commercial Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) based CFD solver PowerFLOW, with future compatibility for experimental open-jet wind tunnel validation studies at the TU Delft's Anechoic wind tunnel. Three variations of a two-sideplate research set-up were created based on a slat-and-main-wing modified 30P30N airfoil cross-section. A `No Gap' (NG) geometry that connects the slat to both sideplates; a `No Horn & Step Stump' (NH) geometry that has a simplified slat side-edge and slat stump, a feature that blends the main wing with the fuselage; and a `Horn & Smooth Stump' (H) geometry, which incorporates a slat horn on the slat side-edge and a slat stump modelled after the Airbus A320. For all three variations, the relative positions of the slat track, slat side-edge and other junction surfaces were modelled after the Airbus A320 as well. All model variants were analysed based on their far-field noise radiation and the near-field behaviour of aerodynamic turbulent structures.

The results of the simulated scaled models were compared to literature. The noise radiation of the `H' model was scaled in power and frequency (Strouhal-based), and compared to beamforming integration flyover data of a junction of an Airbus A320. The model shows good spectral resemblance for higher frequencies, with larger discrepancies at lower frequencies. The low-frequency discrepancies were attributed to beamforming limitations stemming from Rayleigh's criterion, as well as a likely over-prediction of lower frequency noise by the scaled `H' set-up. Comparison to full-scale Reynolds number tests on a model Airbus A320 revealed the slope of the scaled noise spectrum resembled the slope of the slat noise of the Airbus A320 at full Reynolds number both at low and high frequencies.

Contrary to earlier research, the set-up without a sideplate-slat gap, `NG', produced excess noise compared to the `Gap'-models, `NH' and `H'. The excess noise is attributed to a larger spanwise extent of the slat narrow-band peak noise mechanism. The narrow-band peaks stem from a slat-cusp-to-slat-trailing-edge flow-acoustic resonance. The introduction of a side-edge (for the `NH' and `H' models) increases the spanwise velocity in the slat cove and creates a slat cove wake that gets accelerated over the slat track. This study showed that the altered slat cove wake shape prevents the canonical slat-cusp-to-slat-trailing-edge flow impingement from occurring on part of the slat, thus limiting the extent of the resonance mechanism. This phenomenon was portrayed by visualising the slat cove wake through total pressure isosurfaces and visualising the narrow-band peak noise source regions through a Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings (FWH)-based source visualisation technique. A lack of loading on the slat (which is a property of the non-modified 30P30N cross-section as well) is hypothesised as the reason why the introduction of a slat side-edge does not increase the noise radiation for the models with a slat side-edge (`NH', and `H').