Additively manufactured (AM) degradable porous metallic biomaterials offer unique opportunities for satisfying the design requirements of an ideal bone substitute. Among the currently available biodegradable metals, iron has the highest elastic modulus, meaning that it would benefit the most from porous design. Given the successful preclinical applications of such biomaterials for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, the moderate compatibility of AM porous iron with osteoblast-like cells, reported in earlier studies, has been surprising. This may be because, as opposed to static in vitro conditions, the biodegradation products of iron in vivo are transported away and excreted. To better mimic the in situ situations of biodegradable biomaterials after implantation, we compared the biodegradation behavior and cytocompatibility of AM porous iron under static conditions to the conditions with dynamic in situ-like fluid flow perfusion in a bioreactor. Furthermore, the compatibility of these scaffolds with four different cell types was evaluated to better understand the implications of these implants for the complex process of natural wound healing. These included endothelial cells, L929 fibroblasts, RAW264.7 macrophage-like cells, and osteoblastic MG-63 cells. The biodegradation rate of the scaffolds was significantly increased in the perfusion bioreactor as compared to static immersion. Under either condition, the compatibility with L929 cells was the best. Moreover, the compatibility with all the cell types was much enhanced under physiomimetic dynamic flow conditions as compared to static biodegradation. Our study highlights the importance of physiomimetic culture conditions and cell type selection when evaluating the cytocompatibility of degradable biomaterials in vitro. Statement of Significance: Additively manufactured (AM) degradable porous metals offer unique opportunities for the treatment of large bony defects. Despite the successful preclinical applications of biodegradable iron in the cardiovascular field, the moderate compatibility of AM porous iron with osteoblast-like cells was reported. To better mimic the in vivo condition, we compared the biodegradation behavior and cytocompatibility of AM porous iron under static condition to dynamic perfusion. Furthermore, the compatibility of these scaffolds with various cell types was evaluated to better simulate the process of natural wound healing. Our study suggests that AM porous iron holds great promise for orthopedic applications, while also highlighting the importance of physio-mimetic culture conditions and cell type selection when evaluating the cytocompatibility of degradable biomaterials in vitro.

@en

Biodegradable metals as orthopaedic implant materials receive substantial scientific and clinical interest. Marketed cardiovascular products confirm good biocompatibility of iron. Solid iron biodegrades slowly in vivo and has got supra-physiological mechanical properties as compared to bone and porous implants can be optimized for specific orthopaedic applications. We used Direct Metal Printing (DMP)3 to additively manufacture (AM) scaffolds of pure iron with fine-tuned bone-mimetic mechanical properties and improved degradation behavior to characterize their biocompatibility under static and dynamic 3D culture conditions using a spectrum of different cell types. Atomized iron powder was used to manufacture scaffolds with a repetitive diamond unit cell design on a ProX DMP 320 (Layerwise/3D Systems, Belgium). Mechanical characterization (Instron machine with a 10kN load cell, ISO 13314: 2011), degradation behavior under static and dynamic conditions (37ºC, 5% CO2 and 20% O2) for up of 28 days, with μCT as well as SEM/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (SEM, JSM-IT100, JEOL) monitoring under in vivo-like conditions. Biocompatibility was comprehensively evaluated using a broader spectrum of human cells according to ISO 10993 guidelines, with topographically identical titanium (Ti-6Al-4V, Ti64) specimen as reference. Cytotoxicity was analyzed by two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons test (α = 0.05). By μCT, as-built strut size (420 ± 4 μm) and porosity of 64% ± 0.2% were compared to design values (400 μm and 67%, respectively). After 28 days of biodegradation scaffolds showed a 3.1% weight reduction after cleaning, while pH-values of simulated body fluids (r-SBF) increased from 7.4 to 7.8. Mechanical properties of scaffolds (E = 1600–1800 MPa) were still within the range for trabecular bone, then. At all tested time points, close to 100% biocompatibility was shown with identically designed titanium (Ti64) controls (level 0 cytotoxicity). Iron scaffolds revealed a similar cytotoxicity with L929 cells throughout the study, but MG-63 or HUVEC cells revealed a reduced viability of 75% and 60%, respectively, already after 24h and a further decreased survival rate of 50% and 35% after 72h. Static and dynamic cultures revealed different and cell type-specific cytotoxicity profiles. Quantitative assays were confirmed by semi-quantitative cell staining in direct contact to iron and morphological differences were evident in comparison to Ti64 controls. This first report confirms that DMP allows accurate control of interconnectivity and topology of iron scaffold structures. While microstructure and chemical composition influence degradation behavior - so does topology and environmental in vitro conditions during degradation. While porous magnesium corrodes too fast to keep pace with bone remodeling rates, our porous and micro-structured design just holds tremendous potential to optimize the degradation speed of iron for application-specific orthopaedic implants. Surprisingly, the biological evaluation of pure iron scaffolds appears to largely depend on the culture model and cell type. Pure iron may not yet be an ideal surface for osteoblast- or endothelial-like cells in static cultures. We are currently studying appropriate coatings and in vivo-like dynamic culture systems to better predict in vivo biocompatibility.@en

Bioabsorbable metals hold a lot of potential as orthopaedic implant materials. Three metal families are currently being investigated: iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg) and zinc (Zn). Currently, however, biodegradation of such implants is poorly predictable. We thus used Direct Metal Printing to additively manufacture porous implants of a standardized bone-mimetic design and evaluated their mechanical properties and degradation behaviour, respectively, under in vivo-like conditions. Atomized powder was manufactured to porous implants of repetitive diamond unit cells, using a ProX DMP 320 (Layerwise, Belgium) or a custom-modified ReaLizer SLM50 metal printer. Degradation behaviour was characterized under static and dynamic conditions in a custom-built bioreactor system (37ºC, 5% CO2 and 20% O2) for up of 28 days. Implants were characterized by micro-CT before and after in vivo-like degradation. Mechanical characterization (according to ISO 13314: 2011) was performed on an Instron machine (10kN load cell) at different immersion times in simulated body fluid (r-SBF). Morphology and composition of degradation products were analysed (SEM, JSM-IT100, JEOL). Topographically identical titanium (Ti-6Al-4V, Ti64) specimen served as reference. Micro-CT analyses confirmed average strut sizes (420 ± 4 μm), and porosity (64%), to be close to design values. After 28 days of in vivo-like degradation, scaffolds were macroscopically covered by degradation products in an alloy-specific manner. Weight loss after cleaning also varied alloy-specifically, as did the change in pH value of the r-SBF. Corrosion time-dependent changes in Young's moduli from 1200 to 800 MPa for Mg, 1000 to 700 MPa for Zn and 48-8 MPa for iron were statistically significant. In summary, DMP allows to accurately control interconnectivity and topology of implants from all three families and micro-structured design holds potential to optimize their degradation speed. This first systematic report sheds light into how design influences degradation behaviour under in vivo-like conditions to help developing new standards for future medical device evaluation.@en

The ideal bone substituting biomaterials should possess bone-mimicking mechanical properties; have of porous interconnected structure, and adequate biodegradation behaviour to enable full recovery of bony defects. Direct metal printed porous scaffolds hold potential to satisfy all these requirements and were additively manufactured (AM) from atomized WE43 magnesium alloy powder with grain sizes between 20 and 60 μm. Their micro-structure, mechanical properties, degradation behavior and biocompatibility was then evaluated in vitro. Firstly, post-processing values nicely followed design parameters. Next, Young's moduli were similar to that of trabecular bone (i.e., E = 700–800 MPa) even after 28 days of simulated in vivo-like corrosion by in vitro immersion. Also, a relatively moderate hydrogen evolution, corresponding to a calculated 19.2% of scaffold mass loss, was in good agreement with 20.7% volume reduction as derived from reconstructed μCT images. Finally, only moderate cytotoxicity (i.e., level 0, <25%), even after extensive ISO 10993-conform testing for 72 h using MG-63 cells, was determined using WE43 extracts (2 way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons test; α = 0.05). Cytotoxicity was further evaluated by direct live-dead staining assays, revealing a higher cell death in static culture. However, intimate cell-metal contact was observed by SEM. In summary, while pure WE43 may not yet be an ideal surface for cell adhesion, this novel AM process allows for adjusting biodegradation through topological design. Our approach holds tremendous potential to develop functional and biodegradable implants for orthopaedic applications.@en