The usage of drones in urban environments is expected to grow rapidly in the coming decades. To ensure the safe operations of drones, conflict detection and resolution are vital. Currently, a lot of research has gone into state-based CD&R, which has proven effective in unconstrained airspace but suffers from a large number of false positive conflicts in constrained airspace. The use of intent in constrained CD&R has the potential to reduce the number of false positive conflicts and improve the safety of drone operations significantly. In this paper, an intent-based detection and resolution method for orthogonal constrained very low-level urban airspace is presented and evaluated against a state-based method. The intent-based method calculates the future position along the trajectory at a time interval of 3 seconds for each aircraft, and conflicts are then detected by comparing these positions. The conflicts are solved utilizing a rule-based algorithm. The results show that the intent-based method has a much lower false positive rate for all traffic densities, as well as a higher average detection time before conflict for larger look-ahead times compared to the state-based method. The resolution of the state-based method, however, shows better performance with fewer losses of separation occurrences. With improvements, the intent-based method's low false positive rate, combined with the use of a larger look-ahead time, allows conflicts to be detected more reliably and earlier than the state-based method, thereby facilitating earlier conflict resolution and enhancing safety.