To ensure safety in structural design, a method to quantify the damage in thermoplastic ultrasonic single-spot-welded Single-Lap Shear (SLS) joints is needed. This paper investigates whether detailed knowledge regarding the shape of the weld is required when using the global compliance to quantify damage. A finite element model using cohesive zone elements is developed in Abaqus to simulate single-spot SLS specimens with varying weld areas, aspect ratios, and damage growth directions, covering damage levels from 0 to 90% of the initial weld area. For each configuration, the relationship between intact weld area and global compliance is evaluated, and the numerical trends are compared to previously published experimental data from similar joints. The results show that weld size and damage growth direction have negligible influence on the relationship between global compliance and weld area, and that weld shape is also insignificant as long as the aspect ratio remains within a practical range; only very elongated welds with an aspect ratio over 4.4, which are unlikely in production, deviate significantly. Global compliance can be used as a reliable indicator of damage in single-spot ultrasonic welds that is insensitive to weld shape. This enables simplified in situ damage monitoring and reduces the need for detailed geometric characterisation during mechanical testing.

In thermoplastic composite joints with a circular ultrasonic spot weld, the damage growth is located at the interface between the joined components. This means that any damage in these joints is invisible from the outside. This experimental study compares three different in-situ methods to measure the damage growth indirectly. The motivation lies in the potential benefits of using multi-spot welded joints for increased damage tolerance and the need to prove the damage arresting and damage progression behaviour for certification. The current study focused on measuring the damage in single-spot welded Single Lap Shear (SLS) joints during fatigue test with the global specimen compliance, the local out-of-plane displacement and the local strain on the surface. Digital Image Correlation (DIC) measurements were used to obtain the local quantities. The results showed that the local quantities are better suited to obtain detailed information on the damage state. The local surface strain showed more distinct features that facilitate the recognition of damage locations. The benefits and challenges of all methods are discussed as well as the difference in the level of detail, generalization and the prior knowledge necessary to obtain the damage state.