Digital platforms are increasingly promoted as key enablers of circular construction, yet empirical insight remains limited into incumbent supply chain actors’ needs and experiences with these platforms as emerging intermediaries. Addressing this gap, this study examines the perceptions of supply chain actors operating within the Dutch construction sector, drawing on 18 semi-structured interviews, a focus group workshop, and observations from two national circular digital transition programs. Building on existing research, digital platforms are conceptualized not merely as technical infrastructures, but as intermediaries embedded within existing supply chain practices and coordination arrangements, forming triadic relationships between supply and demand actors. Accordingly, the analysis is structured according to different intermediation needs across material flows, support flows, and systemic coordination. The findings indicate that digital platforms are widely expected to enhance supply-demand visibility and matchmaking, support compliance with evolving circularity-related KPIs, and facilitate cross-sector coordination. However, their adoption and perceived value vary substantially across actors, product types, and supply chain configurations, with persistent challenges in coordinating material logistics, accounting for environmental and social externalities and managing evolving platform power dynamics. The study contributes to construction management and circular supply chain research by advancing the concept of intermediaries for examining how digital platforms shape circular transitions. It further highlights the importance of more context-sensitive platform design and governance arrangements that respond to diverse intermediation needs and underlying platform dynamics in the transition to circular construction.

Wicked challenges such as energy and material shortage have prompted educators in AECO disciplines to adopt CBL methods. This paper explores the potential and limitations of using BIM as an education platform to address these challenges within an inter-disciplinary setting. Through two cases at TU Delft, one re-design of a routine building information management course and a new demo-course with joint-interdisciplinary groups, the research evaluates BIM's role in preparing students for real-world energy and circular transitions. Findings highlight BIM's capacity to bridge academic learning and professional practice, while also identifying areas for improvement in its pedagogies.

The construction sector is increasingly recognized as a critical domain in the pursuit of a circular economy (CE) (Adams et al. 2017). In the Netherlands, the landfilling of construction and demolition waste (CDW) is already minimized, underlining the transition outcome to CE, but most of the CDW is currently only processed low level recycling or backfilling (Azcárate- Aguerre 2023). Among the various strategies to circularity, reuse of construction products has shown particular promise, where materials and components are recovered, refurbished if necessary, and reintroduced into new or ongoing building projects(Tsui 2023; Van Uden et al. 2025). Yet, despite its potential, this approach faces a series of practical challenges that impede mainstream adoption: fragmented stakeholder networks, inconsistent or incomplete data about available used materials, and a general lack of robust, integrative logistics mechanisms (Tjahjono 2010). […]

The transition to a circular economy in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry requires coordinated supply chain transitions. Digital tools, such as data-sharing platforms and BIM-based circular design tools, offer potential but remain underutilized, particularly among material suppliers. To bridge this adoption gap, we developed a serious game that connects digital solution developers with AEC professionals, fostering collaboration in circular construction. Tested in a national Growth Fund project, the game simulates real-world challenges, emphasizing needs for data sharing and intermediation. Future integration into lifelong learning programs will equip professionals with the skills to drive circular innovations.

The recent research focus on circular construction supply chains challenges the integration of supply chain processes. There is a need to build simulation tools for construction, facility management, deconstruction and reuse of building components. This paper introduces a model-based tool to enhance supply chain process integration developed with Business Process Mapping and Notation (BPMN). The model captures the remanufacturing supply chain for façade products that are demounted and reapplied in a different construction project. The paper highlights the tool’s potential for predictive analysis and decision support based on supply chain performances. The demonstration shows an innovative approach to CE-driven supply chains.

To close the loop for the circular economy (CE) transition in the construction industry, forward logistics (FL) and reverse logistics (RL), as enabling operations for CE, are important topics to be addressed. However, current research mainly focuses on either FL or RL, with a lack of synthesis that presents an overview of the bi-directional logistics system integrating FL and RL and related mechanisms to close the loop. This review, therefore, explores the current cases of FL and RL in the construction arena through a systematic literature review (SLR) process. A review framework to synthesize and compare both FL and RL operations in various phases of the construction project life cycle (CPLC) has been established for this purpose. The phases include - in FL: design, manufacturing, construction, and operations; and in RL: deconstruction, product reuse, waste distribution, and material reprocessing. The review concludes that while similar methods and CE strategies are used in FL and RL, RL operations require more integration between supply chain actors to close the loop for CE in construction. The findings also indicate that more lateral integration between FL and RL phases beyond the life cycle and industrial boundaries is necessary for CE-driven construction projects, instead of only direct vertical integration with up- and down-stream partners. This review proposes a new conceptual framework of circular logistics integration (CLI) that consists of channel creation, network integration, and inventory management to guide and inspire future research in tackling the systematic barriers that hinder materials and resource flow from RL to FL in construction life cycles.