NS
N. Smith
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
2 records found
1
The identification of time-varying human operator (HO) dynamics is critical for advancing adaptive support systems in manual control tasks. This study evaluates the performance of Adaptive Model Selection (AMS), a framework extending recursive ARX identification methods, for estimating time-varying HO parameters, particularly effective time delay (τ(t)). Two configurations of AMS were tested: AMSq, employing the z-domain ARX representation, and AMSδ, utilizing the delta-domain ARX representation.
A Monte Carlo simulation framework was used to simulate a compensatory manual control task under varying conditions, including remnant noise (Pn) and dynamic transitions in system parameters. Stability and convergence rates of delay estimates were analyzed for different window sizes (Ws). Results show that the correlation between Ws and convergence time was linear and remained unaffected by remnant noise, demonstrating that window size is the primary determinant of responsiveness. Larger Ws improved stability but introduced tracking delays, whereas smaller Ws allowed for faster adaptation to dynamic changes at the cost of increased sensitivity to noise.
The comparative analysis between the configurations revealed a strong dependence of delay estimation accuracy on the precision of the natural frequency estimate of the neuromuscular system (NMS). The natural frequency estimation directly influences HO dynamic response modeling, and inaccuracies in this parameter propagate through the recursive identification process, affecting the reliability of delay estimates.
These findings underscore the critical role of window size and natural frequency estimation in determining the accuracy and stability of effective time delay estimation through AMS. This study provides a foundation for refining AMS to better balance stability and responsiveness in estimating time-varying HO dynamics. Such advancements can facilitate more accurate modeling of time-varying HO behavior, deepen understanding of HO adaptation, and contribute to the advancement of adaptive support systems. ...
A Monte Carlo simulation framework was used to simulate a compensatory manual control task under varying conditions, including remnant noise (Pn) and dynamic transitions in system parameters. Stability and convergence rates of delay estimates were analyzed for different window sizes (Ws). Results show that the correlation between Ws and convergence time was linear and remained unaffected by remnant noise, demonstrating that window size is the primary determinant of responsiveness. Larger Ws improved stability but introduced tracking delays, whereas smaller Ws allowed for faster adaptation to dynamic changes at the cost of increased sensitivity to noise.
The comparative analysis between the configurations revealed a strong dependence of delay estimation accuracy on the precision of the natural frequency estimate of the neuromuscular system (NMS). The natural frequency estimation directly influences HO dynamic response modeling, and inaccuracies in this parameter propagate through the recursive identification process, affecting the reliability of delay estimates.
These findings underscore the critical role of window size and natural frequency estimation in determining the accuracy and stability of effective time delay estimation through AMS. This study provides a foundation for refining AMS to better balance stability and responsiveness in estimating time-varying HO dynamics. Such advancements can facilitate more accurate modeling of time-varying HO behavior, deepen understanding of HO adaptation, and contribute to the advancement of adaptive support systems. ...
The identification of time-varying human operator (HO) dynamics is critical for advancing adaptive support systems in manual control tasks. This study evaluates the performance of Adaptive Model Selection (AMS), a framework extending recursive ARX identification methods, for estimating time-varying HO parameters, particularly effective time delay (τ(t)). Two configurations of AMS were tested: AMSq, employing the z-domain ARX representation, and AMSδ, utilizing the delta-domain ARX representation.
A Monte Carlo simulation framework was used to simulate a compensatory manual control task under varying conditions, including remnant noise (Pn) and dynamic transitions in system parameters. Stability and convergence rates of delay estimates were analyzed for different window sizes (Ws). Results show that the correlation between Ws and convergence time was linear and remained unaffected by remnant noise, demonstrating that window size is the primary determinant of responsiveness. Larger Ws improved stability but introduced tracking delays, whereas smaller Ws allowed for faster adaptation to dynamic changes at the cost of increased sensitivity to noise.
The comparative analysis between the configurations revealed a strong dependence of delay estimation accuracy on the precision of the natural frequency estimate of the neuromuscular system (NMS). The natural frequency estimation directly influences HO dynamic response modeling, and inaccuracies in this parameter propagate through the recursive identification process, affecting the reliability of delay estimates.
These findings underscore the critical role of window size and natural frequency estimation in determining the accuracy and stability of effective time delay estimation through AMS. This study provides a foundation for refining AMS to better balance stability and responsiveness in estimating time-varying HO dynamics. Such advancements can facilitate more accurate modeling of time-varying HO behavior, deepen understanding of HO adaptation, and contribute to the advancement of adaptive support systems.
A Monte Carlo simulation framework was used to simulate a compensatory manual control task under varying conditions, including remnant noise (Pn) and dynamic transitions in system parameters. Stability and convergence rates of delay estimates were analyzed for different window sizes (Ws). Results show that the correlation between Ws and convergence time was linear and remained unaffected by remnant noise, demonstrating that window size is the primary determinant of responsiveness. Larger Ws improved stability but introduced tracking delays, whereas smaller Ws allowed for faster adaptation to dynamic changes at the cost of increased sensitivity to noise.
The comparative analysis between the configurations revealed a strong dependence of delay estimation accuracy on the precision of the natural frequency estimate of the neuromuscular system (NMS). The natural frequency estimation directly influences HO dynamic response modeling, and inaccuracies in this parameter propagate through the recursive identification process, affecting the reliability of delay estimates.
These findings underscore the critical role of window size and natural frequency estimation in determining the accuracy and stability of effective time delay estimation through AMS. This study provides a foundation for refining AMS to better balance stability and responsiveness in estimating time-varying HO dynamics. Such advancements can facilitate more accurate modeling of time-varying HO behavior, deepen understanding of HO adaptation, and contribute to the advancement of adaptive support systems.
AerGo
A recreational ultralight water-aircraft that is transportable by bike
Bachelor thesis
(2018)
-
A.J. van den Berg, K.P. Beukers, L.W. Callens, M. Garber, J. Jördens, S. de Kok, R. Palings, M.J.D. Reekers, N. Smith, M. Taams, V.P. Brügemann, M. Karasek, J.A. Kupski, W. Terra
The AerGo is a recreational ultralight water-aircraft, designed to be transportable by bike and operated without a license. This report outlines its concept, characteristics, and feasibility.
The AerGo features a biwing design with swept wings, closed by vertical plates at the tips. It has a constant wing chord of 0.79 m and a wingspan of 12 m. The aircraft is powered by two six-bladed propellers mounted on the top wing and driven by electric engines. The lower wing is attached to a buoyant hull, stabilized by side floats. A paddle is used for taxiing and docking on water, as the aircraft is designed exclusively for water take-off and landing. The pilot sits inside the hull and controls pitch by shifting weight on a swing. Roll control is achieved through wing warping, and yaw by rudders. The total empty mass is 44.7 kg. A multipurpose trailer system facilitates storage, transport, and deployment. The AerGo is designed for single-person assembly and operation and is safe to fly for over 270 days per year.
A market analysis of ultralight aircraft reveals a European fleet of over 25,000, with 500 in the Netherlands. While most ultralights are custom-built, successful models like the Woopyfly and Lazair have seen large-scale production. The AerGo’s mobility, ease of use, and hydrodynamic capabilities position it competitively. A conservative estimate projects annual sales of 20 units, with 25% for the Dutch market and 75% for Europe. Expansion to North America is a future opportunity.
The design is driven by weight and energy efficiency, with batteries forming a significant part of the empty weight. The primary energy requirement comes from cruise flight, optimized through airfoil selection. The NACA 6415 airfoil, chosen for its high lift coefficient at zero angle of attack, minimizes drag and maximizes cruise efficiency. The hydrodynamic model, based on DSDS data, estimates a take-off speed of 9.9 kg and a 170 m take-off distance. The computed climb rate is 1.43 m/s, reaching a cruise altitude of 150 m in 105 seconds.
The engine and battery design prioritize take-off power while ensuring a minimum flight time of 60 minutes. With a cruise speed of 15 m/s, the AerGo has a range of 40 km. The pilot’s longitudinal position, optimized at 1.6 m, ensures stability. The upper wing has a positive stagger of 0.45 m forward, creating a seesaw effect that smooths weight-shift control. Roll is controlled by wing warping, and yaw by rudders placed at the wing tips. A 15° wing sweep enhances rudder effectiveness, allowing safe operation on a single engine.
The aircraft’s lightweight structure consists of a skin-on-frame design, with a nylon-covered carbon fiber wing weighing 11.3 kg and a dacron-covered carbon fiber hull at 4 kg. Noise reduction is achieved with six-blade propellers, keeping levels below 40 dB at 100 m distance. Approximately 74% of the aircraft is recyclable, with a carbon footprint of 800 kg CO2 per unit.
At an estimated price of €20,000 per unit and annual sales of 20, the break-even point is 9.5 years, with a projected return on investment of €700,000 after 12 years. Further analysis is required on cost budgeting, structural impact resistance, and user assembly instructions to ensure feasibility.
...
The AerGo features a biwing design with swept wings, closed by vertical plates at the tips. It has a constant wing chord of 0.79 m and a wingspan of 12 m. The aircraft is powered by two six-bladed propellers mounted on the top wing and driven by electric engines. The lower wing is attached to a buoyant hull, stabilized by side floats. A paddle is used for taxiing and docking on water, as the aircraft is designed exclusively for water take-off and landing. The pilot sits inside the hull and controls pitch by shifting weight on a swing. Roll control is achieved through wing warping, and yaw by rudders. The total empty mass is 44.7 kg. A multipurpose trailer system facilitates storage, transport, and deployment. The AerGo is designed for single-person assembly and operation and is safe to fly for over 270 days per year.
A market analysis of ultralight aircraft reveals a European fleet of over 25,000, with 500 in the Netherlands. While most ultralights are custom-built, successful models like the Woopyfly and Lazair have seen large-scale production. The AerGo’s mobility, ease of use, and hydrodynamic capabilities position it competitively. A conservative estimate projects annual sales of 20 units, with 25% for the Dutch market and 75% for Europe. Expansion to North America is a future opportunity.
The design is driven by weight and energy efficiency, with batteries forming a significant part of the empty weight. The primary energy requirement comes from cruise flight, optimized through airfoil selection. The NACA 6415 airfoil, chosen for its high lift coefficient at zero angle of attack, minimizes drag and maximizes cruise efficiency. The hydrodynamic model, based on DSDS data, estimates a take-off speed of 9.9 kg and a 170 m take-off distance. The computed climb rate is 1.43 m/s, reaching a cruise altitude of 150 m in 105 seconds.
The engine and battery design prioritize take-off power while ensuring a minimum flight time of 60 minutes. With a cruise speed of 15 m/s, the AerGo has a range of 40 km. The pilot’s longitudinal position, optimized at 1.6 m, ensures stability. The upper wing has a positive stagger of 0.45 m forward, creating a seesaw effect that smooths weight-shift control. Roll is controlled by wing warping, and yaw by rudders placed at the wing tips. A 15° wing sweep enhances rudder effectiveness, allowing safe operation on a single engine.
The aircraft’s lightweight structure consists of a skin-on-frame design, with a nylon-covered carbon fiber wing weighing 11.3 kg and a dacron-covered carbon fiber hull at 4 kg. Noise reduction is achieved with six-blade propellers, keeping levels below 40 dB at 100 m distance. Approximately 74% of the aircraft is recyclable, with a carbon footprint of 800 kg CO2 per unit.
At an estimated price of €20,000 per unit and annual sales of 20, the break-even point is 9.5 years, with a projected return on investment of €700,000 after 12 years. Further analysis is required on cost budgeting, structural impact resistance, and user assembly instructions to ensure feasibility.
...
The AerGo is a recreational ultralight water-aircraft, designed to be transportable by bike and operated without a license. This report outlines its concept, characteristics, and feasibility.
The AerGo features a biwing design with swept wings, closed by vertical plates at the tips. It has a constant wing chord of 0.79 m and a wingspan of 12 m. The aircraft is powered by two six-bladed propellers mounted on the top wing and driven by electric engines. The lower wing is attached to a buoyant hull, stabilized by side floats. A paddle is used for taxiing and docking on water, as the aircraft is designed exclusively for water take-off and landing. The pilot sits inside the hull and controls pitch by shifting weight on a swing. Roll control is achieved through wing warping, and yaw by rudders. The total empty mass is 44.7 kg. A multipurpose trailer system facilitates storage, transport, and deployment. The AerGo is designed for single-person assembly and operation and is safe to fly for over 270 days per year.
A market analysis of ultralight aircraft reveals a European fleet of over 25,000, with 500 in the Netherlands. While most ultralights are custom-built, successful models like the Woopyfly and Lazair have seen large-scale production. The AerGo’s mobility, ease of use, and hydrodynamic capabilities position it competitively. A conservative estimate projects annual sales of 20 units, with 25% for the Dutch market and 75% for Europe. Expansion to North America is a future opportunity.
The design is driven by weight and energy efficiency, with batteries forming a significant part of the empty weight. The primary energy requirement comes from cruise flight, optimized through airfoil selection. The NACA 6415 airfoil, chosen for its high lift coefficient at zero angle of attack, minimizes drag and maximizes cruise efficiency. The hydrodynamic model, based on DSDS data, estimates a take-off speed of 9.9 kg and a 170 m take-off distance. The computed climb rate is 1.43 m/s, reaching a cruise altitude of 150 m in 105 seconds.
The engine and battery design prioritize take-off power while ensuring a minimum flight time of 60 minutes. With a cruise speed of 15 m/s, the AerGo has a range of 40 km. The pilot’s longitudinal position, optimized at 1.6 m, ensures stability. The upper wing has a positive stagger of 0.45 m forward, creating a seesaw effect that smooths weight-shift control. Roll is controlled by wing warping, and yaw by rudders placed at the wing tips. A 15° wing sweep enhances rudder effectiveness, allowing safe operation on a single engine.
The aircraft’s lightweight structure consists of a skin-on-frame design, with a nylon-covered carbon fiber wing weighing 11.3 kg and a dacron-covered carbon fiber hull at 4 kg. Noise reduction is achieved with six-blade propellers, keeping levels below 40 dB at 100 m distance. Approximately 74% of the aircraft is recyclable, with a carbon footprint of 800 kg CO2 per unit.
At an estimated price of €20,000 per unit and annual sales of 20, the break-even point is 9.5 years, with a projected return on investment of €700,000 after 12 years. Further analysis is required on cost budgeting, structural impact resistance, and user assembly instructions to ensure feasibility.
The AerGo features a biwing design with swept wings, closed by vertical plates at the tips. It has a constant wing chord of 0.79 m and a wingspan of 12 m. The aircraft is powered by two six-bladed propellers mounted on the top wing and driven by electric engines. The lower wing is attached to a buoyant hull, stabilized by side floats. A paddle is used for taxiing and docking on water, as the aircraft is designed exclusively for water take-off and landing. The pilot sits inside the hull and controls pitch by shifting weight on a swing. Roll control is achieved through wing warping, and yaw by rudders. The total empty mass is 44.7 kg. A multipurpose trailer system facilitates storage, transport, and deployment. The AerGo is designed for single-person assembly and operation and is safe to fly for over 270 days per year.
A market analysis of ultralight aircraft reveals a European fleet of over 25,000, with 500 in the Netherlands. While most ultralights are custom-built, successful models like the Woopyfly and Lazair have seen large-scale production. The AerGo’s mobility, ease of use, and hydrodynamic capabilities position it competitively. A conservative estimate projects annual sales of 20 units, with 25% for the Dutch market and 75% for Europe. Expansion to North America is a future opportunity.
The design is driven by weight and energy efficiency, with batteries forming a significant part of the empty weight. The primary energy requirement comes from cruise flight, optimized through airfoil selection. The NACA 6415 airfoil, chosen for its high lift coefficient at zero angle of attack, minimizes drag and maximizes cruise efficiency. The hydrodynamic model, based on DSDS data, estimates a take-off speed of 9.9 kg and a 170 m take-off distance. The computed climb rate is 1.43 m/s, reaching a cruise altitude of 150 m in 105 seconds.
The engine and battery design prioritize take-off power while ensuring a minimum flight time of 60 minutes. With a cruise speed of 15 m/s, the AerGo has a range of 40 km. The pilot’s longitudinal position, optimized at 1.6 m, ensures stability. The upper wing has a positive stagger of 0.45 m forward, creating a seesaw effect that smooths weight-shift control. Roll is controlled by wing warping, and yaw by rudders placed at the wing tips. A 15° wing sweep enhances rudder effectiveness, allowing safe operation on a single engine.
The aircraft’s lightweight structure consists of a skin-on-frame design, with a nylon-covered carbon fiber wing weighing 11.3 kg and a dacron-covered carbon fiber hull at 4 kg. Noise reduction is achieved with six-blade propellers, keeping levels below 40 dB at 100 m distance. Approximately 74% of the aircraft is recyclable, with a carbon footprint of 800 kg CO2 per unit.
At an estimated price of €20,000 per unit and annual sales of 20, the break-even point is 9.5 years, with a projected return on investment of €700,000 after 12 years. Further analysis is required on cost budgeting, structural impact resistance, and user assembly instructions to ensure feasibility.