J.F. Azcarate Aguerre
Please Note
17 records found
1
Research significance: Research in the field of circular and PSS-based construction frequently centres on the design and engineering of products, mainly through technical strategies such as design for disassembly and adaptability, and the use of the different “R’s” (Reuse, Repair, Remanufacturing, etc.) to extend and/or reset the service lives of building materials and components. Such an approach often ignores the fact that these strategies require changes in the management, financing, and governance aspects of products and therefore buildings, throughout their entire service-lives. This paper will focus on the systemic administrative (i.e. management, financing, and governance) challenges of the circular and servitisation transitions in the building and construction sector, to enable products which are “Circular by Design”, to effectively support regenerative processes.
Research question: The paper asks how traditional building products’ management, financing, and governance processes prevent or delay the implementation of CE and PSS models. It explores the demand side’s perspective (commissioners, building owners and facility managers), taking a systemic view to the search for new practical, strategic, and scalable administrative models.
Methodology: The research method applies the DAS model (De Jonge et al., 2009; Van der Zwart et al., 2009; den Heijer, 2011; den Heijer et al., 2016) to data gathered from focus group discussion and co-design sessions involving multidisciplinary teams of experts from both academy and industry, as well as literature. The research was conducted within the context of the TU Delft Facades-as-a-Service full-scale pilot project.
Results: The research has shown that, while PSS models to enable material circularity can be partially implemented within the current managerial, financial, and governance framework, this implementation is not efficient, effective, or scalable. This is because standard modes of operation in these disciplines are misaligned with that goal. The practical barriers resulting from this misalignment increase the complexity, risk perception, and therefore cost of PSS alternatives, and thus prevent their organic adoption despite increasing market interest. Recommendations are made for policymakers, financiers, suppliers, and building owners to overcome these barriers. ...
Research significance: Research in the field of circular and PSS-based construction frequently centres on the design and engineering of products, mainly through technical strategies such as design for disassembly and adaptability, and the use of the different “R’s” (Reuse, Repair, Remanufacturing, etc.) to extend and/or reset the service lives of building materials and components. Such an approach often ignores the fact that these strategies require changes in the management, financing, and governance aspects of products and therefore buildings, throughout their entire service-lives. This paper will focus on the systemic administrative (i.e. management, financing, and governance) challenges of the circular and servitisation transitions in the building and construction sector, to enable products which are “Circular by Design”, to effectively support regenerative processes.
Research question: The paper asks how traditional building products’ management, financing, and governance processes prevent or delay the implementation of CE and PSS models. It explores the demand side’s perspective (commissioners, building owners and facility managers), taking a systemic view to the search for new practical, strategic, and scalable administrative models.
Methodology: The research method applies the DAS model (De Jonge et al., 2009; Van der Zwart et al., 2009; den Heijer, 2011; den Heijer et al., 2016) to data gathered from focus group discussion and co-design sessions involving multidisciplinary teams of experts from both academy and industry, as well as literature. The research was conducted within the context of the TU Delft Facades-as-a-Service full-scale pilot project.
Results: The research has shown that, while PSS models to enable material circularity can be partially implemented within the current managerial, financial, and governance framework, this implementation is not efficient, effective, or scalable. This is because standard modes of operation in these disciplines are misaligned with that goal. The practical barriers resulting from this misalignment increase the complexity, risk perception, and therefore cost of PSS alternatives, and thus prevent their organic adoption despite increasing market interest. Recommendations are made for policymakers, financiers, suppliers, and building owners to overcome these barriers.
Facades-as-a-Service
A cross-disciplinary model for the (re)development of circular building envelopes
Façades-as-a-Service
The Role of Technology in the Circular Servitisation of the Building Envelope
Facades-as-a-Service
A business and supply-chain model for the implementation of a circular facade economy
Facade Leasing Demonstrator Project
2.7.3.FLD D4. Final Dissemination Activities Report
Facade Leasing Demonstrator Project
2.7.3.FLD D2. Final Technical Delivery Report
Facade Leasing Demonstrator Project
4.2.6.FLD D3. Business Delivery Report
Facade Leasing Demonstrator Project. Technical Delivery Report
Annex 4.2.6. FLD D2
This technical delivery report focuses on the design, engineering, construction, and monitoring process towards the energy retrofit of the East facade of the building of the Civil Engineering and Geo-sciences faculty at TU Delft (CiTG in Dutch). After building an initial prototype in November 2018, on one of the building’s typical office spaces, plans are to continue with the full retrofit of the
East facade of the building throughout 2019.
The CiTG case is representative of a massive volume of buildings across Europe - over 50% according to some estimates - which have been built during the post-second world war period, and which are currently reaching the end of their original service life. Such buildings need urgent technical intervention in order to improve their energy, safety, and indoor comfort performance. Such interventions, however, must be realized in line with Circular Economy principles, as they demand the strategic investment of immense amount of resources: material, financial, and human. Resources which we cannot afford to keep using under a linear mentality of take - make - dispose. ...
This technical delivery report focuses on the design, engineering, construction, and monitoring process towards the energy retrofit of the East facade of the building of the Civil Engineering and Geo-sciences faculty at TU Delft (CiTG in Dutch). After building an initial prototype in November 2018, on one of the building’s typical office spaces, plans are to continue with the full retrofit of the
East facade of the building throughout 2019.
The CiTG case is representative of a massive volume of buildings across Europe - over 50% according to some estimates - which have been built during the post-second world war period, and which are currently reaching the end of their original service life. Such buildings need urgent technical intervention in order to improve their energy, safety, and indoor comfort performance. Such interventions, however, must be realized in line with Circular Economy principles, as they demand the strategic investment of immense amount of resources: material, financial, and human. Resources which we cannot afford to keep using under a linear mentality of take - make - dispose.
Circular Business Models
Building a Database of Case Studie
Façade Leasing
Drivers and barriers to the delivery of integrated Façades-as-a-Service
Façade Leasing explores an integral, cross-disciplinary model promoting accelerated strategic investment in energy-efficient building envelopes. A focus on performance delivery, rather than product sales, would in turn impulse ongoing innovation in products and management processes. It would also provide the foundations for Circular Economy strategies for the reuse and remanufacturing of building components, leading to a potential reduction in primary raw material consumption across the façade industry.
This study starts by describing the “Façade Leasing pilot project” developed and built at the TU Delft campus by a consortium of açademic and industry partners. It then outlines the main drivers and barriers to the commercial application of the Façade-as-a-Service concept in the Dutch public, nonresidential real estate sector, from the perspective of four key stakeholder groups: Demand drive, or the decision-making process of real estate developers, owners, and managers; Supplier readiness, or the necessary reorganization of products and processes along the supply-chain; Finance, or the distribution of financial resources bridging the gap between initial investment cost and longterm service fees; and governance, or the necessary regulatory innovation required to separate ownership of building and façade.
The research shows that, while further research and validation work is needed to test these principles in a controlled, case-study setting, the potential for façade-as-a-service delivery is within reach under the current legal and economic environment. ...
Façade Leasing explores an integral, cross-disciplinary model promoting accelerated strategic investment in energy-efficient building envelopes. A focus on performance delivery, rather than product sales, would in turn impulse ongoing innovation in products and management processes. It would also provide the foundations for Circular Economy strategies for the reuse and remanufacturing of building components, leading to a potential reduction in primary raw material consumption across the façade industry.
This study starts by describing the “Façade Leasing pilot project” developed and built at the TU Delft campus by a consortium of açademic and industry partners. It then outlines the main drivers and barriers to the commercial application of the Façade-as-a-Service concept in the Dutch public, nonresidential real estate sector, from the perspective of four key stakeholder groups: Demand drive, or the decision-making process of real estate developers, owners, and managers; Supplier readiness, or the necessary reorganization of products and processes along the supply-chain; Finance, or the distribution of financial resources bridging the gap between initial investment cost and longterm service fees; and governance, or the necessary regulatory innovation required to separate ownership of building and façade.
The research shows that, while further research and validation work is needed to test these principles in a controlled, case-study setting, the potential for façade-as-a-service delivery is within reach under the current legal and economic environment.
Integrated Facades as a Product-Service System
Business process innovation to accelerate integral product implementation
Within the current process for designing, manufacturing, and operating facades there is a gap between supply-side discoveries and demand-side needs, which hinders the implementation of resource-efficient facades. Facade leasing as a form of product-service system keeps suppliers committed, throughout the building’s service-life, to safeguard optimum performance in operation, while actively stimulating clients to adopt innovative technical solutions.
The paper elaborates on both supply-side facade innovations and the demand-side conditions necessary to implement such business models. This while exploring the costs and benefits of product-service systems as new collaboration models to align supply and demand incentives. It builds upon the research project “Facade leasing” (MSc thesis by Azcarate-Aguerre, J.F., 2014) and combines knowledge about facade design and engineering (supply-side approach) with the knowledge about client needs, performance criteria, and willingness to pay (demand-side approach). The research methodology includes literature review and expert interviews, integrating both theory and practice.
This paper argues that a Product-Service System approach to facade design, construction, operation, and renovation could accelerate the rate and depth of building energy renovations. It could also provide incentives to supply- and demand-side stakeholders, to implement Circular Economy principles through new models of product ownership, service contracting, and performance delivery. It aims at establishing the general conceptual frame of a Product-Service System for leasable facades, setting the basic parameters to be taken into account when designing a PSS-based business model, and formulating its value proposition.
...
Within the current process for designing, manufacturing, and operating facades there is a gap between supply-side discoveries and demand-side needs, which hinders the implementation of resource-efficient facades. Facade leasing as a form of product-service system keeps suppliers committed, throughout the building’s service-life, to safeguard optimum performance in operation, while actively stimulating clients to adopt innovative technical solutions.
The paper elaborates on both supply-side facade innovations and the demand-side conditions necessary to implement such business models. This while exploring the costs and benefits of product-service systems as new collaboration models to align supply and demand incentives. It builds upon the research project “Facade leasing” (MSc thesis by Azcarate-Aguerre, J.F., 2014) and combines knowledge about facade design and engineering (supply-side approach) with the knowledge about client needs, performance criteria, and willingness to pay (demand-side approach). The research methodology includes literature review and expert interviews, integrating both theory and practice.
This paper argues that a Product-Service System approach to facade design, construction, operation, and renovation could accelerate the rate and depth of building energy renovations. It could also provide incentives to supply- and demand-side stakeholders, to implement Circular Economy principles through new models of product ownership, service contracting, and performance delivery. It aims at establishing the general conceptual frame of a Product-Service System for leasable facades, setting the basic parameters to be taken into account when designing a PSS-based business model, and formulating its value proposition.
Integrated Facades as a Product-Service System
An innovative business model for the implementation of Circular Economies in the construction industry
broad reorganization of processes and responsibilities throughout an industry’s
supply chain. Such reorganization can no longer be solely conceptualized by
academics in diverse manufacturing fields, but must be developed and grounded
with the involvement of business-oriented industry partners who represent
the interests and concerns of real supply and demand side stakeholders. The
shift towards circular development starts at a strategic level, by identifying
the business potential of models that extend collaboration, reinforce customer
loyalty for suppliers and optimize performance-oriented services for clients.
This strategic decision must then trickle down their respective organizations
to include all technical, administrative and executive teams and facilitate the
creation of product-service combinations.
Alternative ownership and financing models are emerging, in line with the
principles of circular economies. These models are based on lower initial capital
investments, material ownership retention by suppliers, and the delivery of
buildings as living, dynamic and adaptable platforms, as opposed to current
enclosed and static constructions. The business processes underlying such a shift
in industrial culture can accelerate the rate and effectiveness of energy- and
resource-efficient building renovations by applying the principles of constant
vitalization of systems and components, thus future-proofing buildings and
extending their potential service-life indefinitely.
This report will describe a foundation roadmap towards the implementation of
circular, integrated façade systems, based on our team’s experience developing a
pilot project with the involvement of leading industry partners in the Netherlands.
The process will be described in sequence: starting with the creation of a pilot
supply chain and consortium; working through the integration of independent
technologies into physical and digital product packages which allow (de)
centralized control and management of smart, interconnected, performance delivering
products; and finishing with the new business scheme and value
proposition created by long-term collaboration between suppliers and clients. ...
broad reorganization of processes and responsibilities throughout an industry’s
supply chain. Such reorganization can no longer be solely conceptualized by
academics in diverse manufacturing fields, but must be developed and grounded
with the involvement of business-oriented industry partners who represent
the interests and concerns of real supply and demand side stakeholders. The
shift towards circular development starts at a strategic level, by identifying
the business potential of models that extend collaboration, reinforce customer
loyalty for suppliers and optimize performance-oriented services for clients.
This strategic decision must then trickle down their respective organizations
to include all technical, administrative and executive teams and facilitate the
creation of product-service combinations.
Alternative ownership and financing models are emerging, in line with the
principles of circular economies. These models are based on lower initial capital
investments, material ownership retention by suppliers, and the delivery of
buildings as living, dynamic and adaptable platforms, as opposed to current
enclosed and static constructions. The business processes underlying such a shift
in industrial culture can accelerate the rate and effectiveness of energy- and
resource-efficient building renovations by applying the principles of constant
vitalization of systems and components, thus future-proofing buildings and
extending their potential service-life indefinitely.
This report will describe a foundation roadmap towards the implementation of
circular, integrated façade systems, based on our team’s experience developing a
pilot project with the involvement of leading industry partners in the Netherlands.
The process will be described in sequence: starting with the creation of a pilot
supply chain and consortium; working through the integration of independent
technologies into physical and digital product packages which allow (de)
centralized control and management of smart, interconnected, performance delivering
products; and finishing with the new business scheme and value
proposition created by long-term collaboration between suppliers and clients.