N. Nijholt
Please Note
7 records found
1
A Tsunami Generated by a Strike-Slip Event
Constraints From GPS and SAR Data on the 2018 Palu Earthquake
A devastating tsunami struck Palu Bay in the wake of the 28 September 2018 Mw = 7.5 Palu earthquake (Sulawesi, Indonesia). With a predominantly strike-slip mechanism, the question remains whether this unexpected tsunami was generated by the earthquake itself, or rather by earthquake-induced landslides. In this study we examine the tsunami potential of the co-seismic deformation. To this end, we present a novel geodetic data set of Global Positioning System and multiple Synthetic Aperture Radar-derived displacement fields to estimate a 3D co-seismic surface deformation field. The data reveal a number of fault bends, conforming to our interpretation of the tectonic setting as a transtensional basin. Using a Bayesian framework, we provide robust finite fault solutions of the co-seismic slip distribution, incorporating several scenarios of tectonically feasible fault orientations below the bay. These finite fault scenarios involve large co-seismic uplift (>2 m) below the bay due to thrusting on a restraining fault bend that connects the offshore continuation of two parallel onshore fault segments. With the co-seismic displacement estimates as input we simulate a number of tsunami cases. For most locations for which video-derived tsunami waveforms are available our models provide a qualitative fit to leading wave arrival times and polarity. The modeled tsunamis explain most of the observed runup. We conclude that co-seismic deformation was the main driver behind the tsunami that followed the Palu earthquake. Our unique geodetic data set constrains vertical motions of the sea floor, and sheds new light on the tsunamigenesis of strike-slip faults in transtensional basins.
Our models are spherical 2D finite element models representing vertical lithospheric averages. In addition to regional plate boundaries, the models include well-constrained fault zones like north and south branches of the North Anatolian Fault, Gulf of Corinth and faults bounding the Menderes Massif. Boundary conditions represent geodynamic processes: (1) far-field relative plate motions; (2) resistive fault tractions; (3) HGSs from lateral density variations; (4) slab pull and trench suction at subduction zones; and (5) active asthenospheric convection. The magnitude of each of these is a parameter in a Bayesian analysis of ~100,000 models and horizontal GNSS velocities. The search yields a probability distribution of all parameter values including model error, allowing us to determine mean/median parameter values, robustly estimate parameter uncertainties, and identify tradeoffs (i.e., parameter covariances).
The average viscosity of the overriding plate is well resolved 3-4 10^22 Pa.s, which is higher than from published models without faults. Significant trench suction forces from the Hellenic slab act on the overriding Aegean Sea, including along the Pliny-Strabo STEP Fault. Slab pull and convective tractions have a small imprint on the observed deformation of the overriding plate. HGSs are necessary to explain local features in the velocity field, particularly in the Aegean Sea, but are less important for fitting the regional pattern of velocities. Resistive tractions on most plate boundaries and faults are low.
The 2018 (Formula presented.) Palu earthquake is a remarkable strike-slip event due to its nature as a shallow supershear fault rupture across several segments and a destructive tsunami that followed coseismic deformation. GPS offsets in the wake of the 2018 earthquake display a transient in the surface motions of northwest Sulawesi. A Bayesian approach identifies (predominantly aseismic) deep afterslip on and below the coseismic rupture plane as the dominant physical mechanism causing the cumulative, postseismic, surface displacements whereas viscous relaxation of the lower crust and poro-elastic rebound contribute negligibly. We confirm a correlation between shallow supershear rupture and postseismic surface transients with afterslip activity in the zone below an interseismically locked fault plane where the slip rate tapers from zero to creeping.
We quantify the model parameter resolution and tradeoffs in light of the available kinematic surface observations with a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach, implementing the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. We compare the model results to the geodetic velocity observations, which have the smallest error margins of all the kinematic observations, and to the sense of shear along (potentially) active fault zones. Preliminary results based on a search of 60,000 models indicate that the observed GNSS velocity field and sense of slip on regional faults in the Gibraltar Arc appear to result mainly from Africa-Europe plate convergence and lateral GPE variations. Slab pull from the Gibraltar slab is very likely transmitted poorly into the overriding plate and probability distributions for the trench suction force do not display any favorable value to affect the kinematics in the Gibraltar Arc region. The best models have rms-misfits of 0.23 mm/yr, which is mostly due to a systematic SW motion of up to 4 mm/yr in the SW Rif. ...
We quantify the model parameter resolution and tradeoffs in light of the available kinematic surface observations with a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach, implementing the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. We compare the model results to the geodetic velocity observations, which have the smallest error margins of all the kinematic observations, and to the sense of shear along (potentially) active fault zones. Preliminary results based on a search of 60,000 models indicate that the observed GNSS velocity field and sense of slip on regional faults in the Gibraltar Arc appear to result mainly from Africa-Europe plate convergence and lateral GPE variations. Slab pull from the Gibraltar slab is very likely transmitted poorly into the overriding plate and probability distributions for the trench suction force do not display any favorable value to affect the kinematics in the Gibraltar Arc region. The best models have rms-misfits of 0.23 mm/yr, which is mostly due to a systematic SW motion of up to 4 mm/yr in the SW Rif.
The Gibraltar arc
Can various (near)surface observations be explained through lithospheric-scale forces?