This study experimentally investigates the performance of vortex generators (VGs) designed for steady stall control in preventing unsteady trailing-edge flow separation and dynamic stall during pitch oscillations occurring on inboard and midboard wind turbine blade sections. Surface pressure measurements are conducted in the TU Delft low-speed wind tunnel on a DU-97-W-300 airfoil undergoing pitch oscillations while equipped with VGs of various vane sizes and shapes. In steady conditions, vanes with heights smaller than the local boundary layer thickness optimally balance delaying stall following trailing-edge separation with achieving maximum lift-to-drag ratio among the tested triangular vane VGs. However, these same VGs with vane heights smaller than or equal to the steady local boundary layer thickness are insufficient to suppress the onset and upstream progression of a trailing-edge separation front in all pitching cycles. VGs whose vane height exceeds the local boundary layer thickness for a larger part of the pitch cycle prevent the onset and upstream progression of the trailing-edge separation front for a larger percentage of cycles. Contrary to past literature, rectangular vanes yield a higher steady aerodynamic efficiency than triangular vanes. Rectangular vanes also suppress trailing-edge flow separation in all pitching cycles at all tested reduced frequencies, indicating more effective boundary layer energization than triangular vanes, thus proving to be a better VG shape for steady and unsteady stall suppression on thick airfoils.

Modern slender wind turbine blades use thick inboard airfoils and thicker trailing edges prone to flow separation. The increasing size of these flexible blades amplifies the importance of considering unsteady aerodynamics during the design phase. Environmental conditions result in Leading Edge Erosion (LER), further complicating the sectional unsteady aerodynamic behaviour. Although vortex generators are a well-studied method for passive separation control under steady conditions, their influence on unsteady aerodynamics for clean and rough blade sections is an area that requires further exploration. While some numerical studies exist, reliable experimental data is lacking in the literature. This work presents experimental results on the dynamic stall behaviour of a DU97W300 airfoil, a typical thick root section. The investigation covers both clean and rough conditions, both with and without VGs, to create an understanding of how VGs impact dynamic stall. Moreover, various VG array configurations are used to study the parametric dependence of dynamic stall phenomena on the VG array parameters.

As the demand for renewable energy increases, wind turbine rotors will become larger with slender blades. Vortex Generators (VGs) are used for passive flow control to avoid flow separation and reduce unsteady loading on the thick root section of slender blades due to their simplicity, inexpensiveness, and the ability to retrofit them to blades. Aerodynamic load calculations for VGs involve long experimental campaigns or resource intensive CFD calculations. Due to their inherent time-intensive nature aeroelastic optimisation and design tools prefer to use simplified but accurate analysis tools for aerodynamic load calculations of clean airfoils. One such class of tools are viscous-inviscid interaction solvers that use Integral Boundary Layer (IBL) methods for viscous calculations in the boundary layer coupled with an inviscid solver for the rest of the domain. The most popular example of this tool is XFOIL. An engineering model for VGs in IBL methods has previously been developed and implemented in XFOIL. In this research, the model parameters are tuned for implementation in another tool RFOIL based on XFOIL. RFOIL has been developed for accurate and robust analysis of wind turbine airfoils with improvements for thick airfoils and rotational corrections. The aerodynamic performance predicted the VG model in both XFOIL and RFOIL is then validated with an extensive database of airfoil data consisting of airfoils between 21% to 60% thickness, as well as Reynolds numbers between 1 million to 14 million, equipped with and without VGs. Finally, the computation time for the VG model is compared with that for a clean airfoil analysis in the same viscous-inviscid interaction solvers RFOIL and XFOIL. The investigation provides an overview of the usability of the engineering model in airfoil design methodologies in the wind turbine industry.