Z. Peng
Please Note
6 records found
1
Mood-Focused Design
An Integrative Exploration
The dissertation begins with a scoping review of mood-related design literature. The findings reveal three conceptual categories of mood-focused design—mood-monitoring, mood-expressing, and mood-regulating design—and identify specific design issues associated with each category, together with strategies proposed to address them. Together, these findings provide a useful lens for clarifying what may be considered mood-focused design initiatives and offer actionable guidance for such efforts.
The second strand draws on interviews with design practitioners, adding nuance to the picture that emerged from the literature. The findings show that mood is addressed in practice in multiple ways: as an end in itself, and as a means to enhance engagement, enrich experience, create differentiation or strategic advantage, and facilitate user research. These findings further demonstrate that mood-regulating design, as one category of mood-focused design, may be oriented either toward intrinsic well-being goals or toward more instrumental, outcome-driven goals in real-world projects.
The third strand consists of our own practice-based exploration as researcher-designers, grounded in a specific everyday mood phenomenon: the “Sunday Blues,” a dip in mood often experienced during the transition from Sunday to Monday. Through a qualitative inquiry into its manifestations, contributing factors, and coping strategies, this strand illustrates how a subtle everyday mood phenomenon can be studied in depth. Through the design and evaluation of speculative interventions for the “Sunday Blues,” it also generates user-centered insights into how mood-regulating design may be meaningfully embedded in everyday life.
By integrating insights from design researchers, design practitioners, and our own exploration as researcher-designers, this dissertation offers a more explicit and comprehensive understanding of mood-focused design. It articulates key conceptual categories, reveals pragmatic orientations in the ways mood is incorporated into real-world design practice, and provides situated examples and considerations for engaging with mood in everyday contexts. In doing so, it supports the development of cumulative knowledge on mood-focused design and offers a foundation for addressing mood in a more systematic and impactful way in both research and practice. ...
The dissertation begins with a scoping review of mood-related design literature. The findings reveal three conceptual categories of mood-focused design—mood-monitoring, mood-expressing, and mood-regulating design—and identify specific design issues associated with each category, together with strategies proposed to address them. Together, these findings provide a useful lens for clarifying what may be considered mood-focused design initiatives and offer actionable guidance for such efforts.
The second strand draws on interviews with design practitioners, adding nuance to the picture that emerged from the literature. The findings show that mood is addressed in practice in multiple ways: as an end in itself, and as a means to enhance engagement, enrich experience, create differentiation or strategic advantage, and facilitate user research. These findings further demonstrate that mood-regulating design, as one category of mood-focused design, may be oriented either toward intrinsic well-being goals or toward more instrumental, outcome-driven goals in real-world projects.
The third strand consists of our own practice-based exploration as researcher-designers, grounded in a specific everyday mood phenomenon: the “Sunday Blues,” a dip in mood often experienced during the transition from Sunday to Monday. Through a qualitative inquiry into its manifestations, contributing factors, and coping strategies, this strand illustrates how a subtle everyday mood phenomenon can be studied in depth. Through the design and evaluation of speculative interventions for the “Sunday Blues,” it also generates user-centered insights into how mood-regulating design may be meaningfully embedded in everyday life.
By integrating insights from design researchers, design practitioners, and our own exploration as researcher-designers, this dissertation offers a more explicit and comprehensive understanding of mood-focused design. It articulates key conceptual categories, reveals pragmatic orientations in the ways mood is incorporated into real-world design practice, and provides situated examples and considerations for engaging with mood in everyday contexts. In doing so, it supports the development of cumulative knowledge on mood-focused design and offers a foundation for addressing mood in a more systematic and impactful way in both research and practice.
User Concerns Regarding Social Robots for Mood Regulation
A Case Study on the “Sunday Blues”
Mie
An interactive and personalized intervention to prevent the Sunday blues
Mood as a Means Versus an End
Unraveling How Experienced Practitioners Address Mood in Experience Design
This article presents a study exploring how designers consider and approach user or customer mood in real-world projects. Because explicit mood-focused practice is difficult to identify and often masked by overlapping terminology, we conducted retrospective interviews with twenty experienced practitioners across the field of experience design. While participants tended to conflate mood with other affective constructs, many had nevertheless incorporated it—directly or indirectly—into their work. From their accounts, we identified five approaches to addressing mood in design: treating it as (1) an end in itself, (2) a means to enhance engagement, (3) a means to enrich experience, (4) a means to create differentiation or advantage, and (5) a means to facilitate user research. These findings advance understanding of mood-focused design by highlighting practitioners’ implicit engagement with mood and their pragmatic considerations, which extend beyond intrinsic well-being goals to instrumental, outcome-oriented goals. At the same time, we identified four categories of challenges practitioners face, three types of knowledge they regard as essential, and four obstacles that discourage them from bringing mood into practice or organizational contexts. Building on these insights, we outline research and educational opportunities to better support future mood-focused design practice.
Mood in Experience Design
A Scoping Review