FB
F.M. Bulsing
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
2 records found
1
SAR-based Flood Monitoring
Comparison of Synthetic Aperture Radar sources on the Water-Land Boundary estimation for flood events in the Netherlands
Master thesis
(2025)
-
F.M. Bulsing, F.J. Lopez Dekker, R.C. Lindenbergh, N.C. van de Giesen, Reinier Oost
Floods are natural hazards with severe impacts, and their frequency and intensity are increasing due to climate change. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellites are widely used for flood mapping, as they operate independently of weather and time of day. This thesis examines the potential of SAR-based flood monitoring through a case study of the July 2021 flood in Limburg, the Netherlands. Comparing Capella Space on-demand X-Band imagery (sub-meter resolution) with Sentinel-1 open-source C-Band imagery (5 m x 20 m resolution). The Water-Land Boundary was determined by estimating flood extent and water levels, with multiple methods evaluated for the distinct products from both data sources. Capella Space provided a single image acquisition at the flood’s peak, with a thresholding method used to classify flooded pixels. For Sentinel-1, an Amplitude Time Series Analysis (ATSA) was applied to data from 2017 to 2024 to identify flood-related outliers. The water levels are estimated from flood extent edges with the national LiDAR DEM (AHN4).
Evaluation of the modeled results using an error matrix at the acquisition time showed that 67% and 68% of the pixels were correctly classified from the flood extents derived from Capella Space and Sentinel-1, respectively. The maximum flood extent from Sentinel-1 data decreased to 45% correct classification when compared to the modeled results at the peak of the flood. This is consistent with the acquisition times, which were taken before and two days after the flood peak, missing the peak flood moment. SAR-based water levels showed an overall precision of 0.141 m for Capella Space and 0.156 m for Sentinel-1. Agreement with water level gauge measurements was better in flatter, less vegetated areas and lower in steep, vegetated areas. Achieving consistent 20 cm water level accuracy (as required by the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management), across the study area remains complex. Both methods are prone to false positives and negatives, especially in areas with steep slopes, narrow canals, high vegetation, or roads. False classifications result in inaccurate flood extents, thus decreasing water level accuracy. Higher resolution of Capella Space images provided better alignment with the maximum flood extent, while Sentinel-1 images have wider coverage but missed the timing of the flood peak. In the end, the choice of SAR-system depends on timing, surface characteristics, and mapping extent needs. ...
Evaluation of the modeled results using an error matrix at the acquisition time showed that 67% and 68% of the pixels were correctly classified from the flood extents derived from Capella Space and Sentinel-1, respectively. The maximum flood extent from Sentinel-1 data decreased to 45% correct classification when compared to the modeled results at the peak of the flood. This is consistent with the acquisition times, which were taken before and two days after the flood peak, missing the peak flood moment. SAR-based water levels showed an overall precision of 0.141 m for Capella Space and 0.156 m for Sentinel-1. Agreement with water level gauge measurements was better in flatter, less vegetated areas and lower in steep, vegetated areas. Achieving consistent 20 cm water level accuracy (as required by the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management), across the study area remains complex. Both methods are prone to false positives and negatives, especially in areas with steep slopes, narrow canals, high vegetation, or roads. False classifications result in inaccurate flood extents, thus decreasing water level accuracy. Higher resolution of Capella Space images provided better alignment with the maximum flood extent, while Sentinel-1 images have wider coverage but missed the timing of the flood peak. In the end, the choice of SAR-system depends on timing, surface characteristics, and mapping extent needs. ...
Floods are natural hazards with severe impacts, and their frequency and intensity are increasing due to climate change. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellites are widely used for flood mapping, as they operate independently of weather and time of day. This thesis examines the potential of SAR-based flood monitoring through a case study of the July 2021 flood in Limburg, the Netherlands. Comparing Capella Space on-demand X-Band imagery (sub-meter resolution) with Sentinel-1 open-source C-Band imagery (5 m x 20 m resolution). The Water-Land Boundary was determined by estimating flood extent and water levels, with multiple methods evaluated for the distinct products from both data sources. Capella Space provided a single image acquisition at the flood’s peak, with a thresholding method used to classify flooded pixels. For Sentinel-1, an Amplitude Time Series Analysis (ATSA) was applied to data from 2017 to 2024 to identify flood-related outliers. The water levels are estimated from flood extent edges with the national LiDAR DEM (AHN4).
Evaluation of the modeled results using an error matrix at the acquisition time showed that 67% and 68% of the pixels were correctly classified from the flood extents derived from Capella Space and Sentinel-1, respectively. The maximum flood extent from Sentinel-1 data decreased to 45% correct classification when compared to the modeled results at the peak of the flood. This is consistent with the acquisition times, which were taken before and two days after the flood peak, missing the peak flood moment. SAR-based water levels showed an overall precision of 0.141 m for Capella Space and 0.156 m for Sentinel-1. Agreement with water level gauge measurements was better in flatter, less vegetated areas and lower in steep, vegetated areas. Achieving consistent 20 cm water level accuracy (as required by the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management), across the study area remains complex. Both methods are prone to false positives and negatives, especially in areas with steep slopes, narrow canals, high vegetation, or roads. False classifications result in inaccurate flood extents, thus decreasing water level accuracy. Higher resolution of Capella Space images provided better alignment with the maximum flood extent, while Sentinel-1 images have wider coverage but missed the timing of the flood peak. In the end, the choice of SAR-system depends on timing, surface characteristics, and mapping extent needs.
Evaluation of the modeled results using an error matrix at the acquisition time showed that 67% and 68% of the pixels were correctly classified from the flood extents derived from Capella Space and Sentinel-1, respectively. The maximum flood extent from Sentinel-1 data decreased to 45% correct classification when compared to the modeled results at the peak of the flood. This is consistent with the acquisition times, which were taken before and two days after the flood peak, missing the peak flood moment. SAR-based water levels showed an overall precision of 0.141 m for Capella Space and 0.156 m for Sentinel-1. Agreement with water level gauge measurements was better in flatter, less vegetated areas and lower in steep, vegetated areas. Achieving consistent 20 cm water level accuracy (as required by the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management), across the study area remains complex. Both methods are prone to false positives and negatives, especially in areas with steep slopes, narrow canals, high vegetation, or roads. False classifications result in inaccurate flood extents, thus decreasing water level accuracy. Higher resolution of Capella Space images provided better alignment with the maximum flood extent, while Sentinel-1 images have wider coverage but missed the timing of the flood peak. In the end, the choice of SAR-system depends on timing, surface characteristics, and mapping extent needs.
Cloud Forest Hydrology in a Changing Context
An Approach to understanding the impact of CLimate Change and Deforestation on the Water Balance of the Sierra Yalijux, Alta Verapaz, Guatemala
Student report
(2023)
-
D.Y. Arias Agudelo, F.M. Bulsing, J.M. Schrijver, M.M.P. Luger, R.L. Cahill, S. Pande, M.A. Schleiss, B.J.H. van de Wiel
This project is a consulting project for Community Cloud Forest Conservation (CCFC) on how to obtain and communicate to relevant stakeholders an understanding of the impact of land use change and climate change on the hydrological balance of the cloud forest ecosystem in the Sierra Yalijux. The outcomes of the project will be used by CCFC and partners in four areas: Rural water committee capacity building with municipal and village leadership groups, environmental education with the ministry of education, reforestation, and conservation carbon/water credit prioritization with the national forestry institute, and to create thesis topics for bachelors level students with Universidad Rafael Landívar and Universidad de San Carlos. In order to achieve this goal, we divided our efforts in four areas: First, a description of the situation and a review of literature to identify gaps in scientific and practical understanding of local cloud forest hydrology (Chapter 2). Second, an analysis of the situation at a regional scale using publicly available historical data such as remote sensing data and data from the national meteorological authority (Chapter 3). Third, identifying important hydrological processes in the Cloud Forest micro-climate (Chapter 4) and prototyping and testing measurement setups (Chapter 5). Fourth, making suggestions on how to apply the results to the intended impact areas that CCFC has (Chapter 6). Our recommendations to CCFC for capacity building with water committees are based on a literature re view, we found that the presence of Cloud Forest is expected to increase base flow in springs due to its ability to capture additional hydrological inputs in the dry season, increase moisture recycling after heavy rain events, and store water in the soil. We recommend working with water committees to outline the recharge zones of their springs, run some simple calculations on water availability based on precipitation, and develop manage ment plans for the area. Our recommendations for further research are based on the research approaches we describe at the regional scale and the prototyping of field methodologies that we tested. A more permanent setup for data collection is being developed jointly with the Universidad de San Carlos at CCFC’s nature preserve.
...
This project is a consulting project for Community Cloud Forest Conservation (CCFC) on how to obtain and communicate to relevant stakeholders an understanding of the impact of land use change and climate change on the hydrological balance of the cloud forest ecosystem in the Sierra Yalijux. The outcomes of the project will be used by CCFC and partners in four areas: Rural water committee capacity building with municipal and village leadership groups, environmental education with the ministry of education, reforestation, and conservation carbon/water credit prioritization with the national forestry institute, and to create thesis topics for bachelors level students with Universidad Rafael Landívar and Universidad de San Carlos. In order to achieve this goal, we divided our efforts in four areas: First, a description of the situation and a review of literature to identify gaps in scientific and practical understanding of local cloud forest hydrology (Chapter 2). Second, an analysis of the situation at a regional scale using publicly available historical data such as remote sensing data and data from the national meteorological authority (Chapter 3). Third, identifying important hydrological processes in the Cloud Forest micro-climate (Chapter 4) and prototyping and testing measurement setups (Chapter 5). Fourth, making suggestions on how to apply the results to the intended impact areas that CCFC has (Chapter 6). Our recommendations to CCFC for capacity building with water committees are based on a literature re view, we found that the presence of Cloud Forest is expected to increase base flow in springs due to its ability to capture additional hydrological inputs in the dry season, increase moisture recycling after heavy rain events, and store water in the soil. We recommend working with water committees to outline the recharge zones of their springs, run some simple calculations on water availability based on precipitation, and develop manage ment plans for the area. Our recommendations for further research are based on the research approaches we describe at the regional scale and the prototyping of field methodologies that we tested. A more permanent setup for data collection is being developed jointly with the Universidad de San Carlos at CCFC’s nature preserve.